Romans 3:5 - But if our unrighteousness commends the righteousness of God, what will we say? Is God unrighteous who inflicts wrath? I speak like men do.

Generated Verse: Romans 3:5

What does "Romans 3:5" mean?


Romans 3:5 is a complex verse that Paul uses to anticipate and address a potential objection to his argument about justification by faith. Let's break it down phrase by phrase:

"But if our unrighteousness commends the righteousness of God..." This is the crux of the objection. It poses a hypothetical scenario: If our sin (unrighteousness) actually highlights and makes God's righteousness even more apparent (because God's forgiveness shines brighter in contrast to our sin), then...

"...what will we say?" This signals that Paul is introducing a difficult question or a potential problem with the idea that our unrighteousness commends the righteousness of God.

"Is God unrighteous who inflicts wrath?" This is the core of the objection. If our sin ultimately showcases God's righteousness, wouldn't it be unfair or even unrighteous for God to punish that sin (inflict wrath)? The logic goes: If my sin is ultimately beneficial to God's glory, why should I be punished for it? Isn't God being unfair if He punishes something that ultimately brings Him glory?

"I speak like men do." This is an important qualification. Paul acknowledges that the reasoning he's presenting is based on a human, perhaps flawed, way of thinking. He's saying, "I'm expressing this objection in a way that people commonly argue," indicating that he doesn't necessarily agree with the logic. It's as if he's saying, "Let me translate this objection into terms you'd understand."

In essence, the verse presents a potential problem:

If God's righteousness is demonstrated by our unrighteousness, can God justly punish us for that unrighteousness?

Paul's Purpose:

Paul isn't endorsing this logic; he's setting up the argument that he'll dismantle in the following verses. His aim is to anticipate and address this potential misunderstanding to avoid the misinterpretation that God is somehow dependent on our sin or that we are justified in sinning.

Underlying Issues and Considerations:

God's Justice and Righteousness: Paul is profoundly concerned with preserving the integrity of God's justice and righteousness. He wants to make it clear that God's grace doesn't negate His justice.
Misunderstanding Grace: The objection anticipates the potential misuse of the concept of grace. Some might argue that since God's grace is so abundant, they can continue to sin without consequence.
God's Sovereignty: The verse touches on the complex relationship between God's sovereignty and human responsibility.

The implication of this verse is that Paul is arguing against the idea that God needs our sin to demonstrate his righteousness. The purpose of unrighteousness does not commend, or enhance, the righteousness of God. It opposes it. The righteousness of God must be upheld and sin cannot simply be ignored.

In the verses that follow, Paul will clarify that God's righteousness is demonstrated through the atonement offered by Jesus Christ, which satisfies both His justice and His mercy. He emphasizes that God's righteousness is not contingent on our sin but is a fundamental attribute of His character.

What categories does "Romans 3:5" have?