Exodus 21:12 - “One who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Exodus 21:12" mean?
Exodus 21:12, "One who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death," establishes the principle that intentional killing is a capital offense, punishable by death. Here's a breakdown of what it means and the context surrounding it:
"One who strikes a man...": This refers to a person who physically assaults another person. The Hebrew word for "strikes" (נכה, nakah) implies a forceful blow.
"...so that he dies...": This is the crucial consequence: the assault leads directly to the victim's death.
"...shall surely be put to death.": This states the mandatory punishment for the perpetrator: capital punishment (execution).
Key Interpretations and Nuances:
Intent: While the verse itself doesn't explicitly state "intentional," Jewish legal interpretation (particularly in the Talmud) does emphasize intent. The Rabbis differentiated between:
Intentional Murder (with premeditation): This is the situation this verse primarily addresses. It requires a deliberate plan and a clear intention to kill. This would have carried the most severe penalty.
Unintentional Manslaughter: Later verses in the chapter (specifically Exodus 21:13) deal with cases where the death was accidental, without malice or intent. In such cases, the person could flee to a designated "city of refuge" for protection from blood vengeance.
Negligent Homicide: This might cover situations where someone's carelessness or recklessness led to a death, but without a direct intention to harm. Punishments for this could vary but would be less severe than intentional murder.
"Eye for an Eye" vs. Monetary Compensation: It's important to note that the "eye for an eye" principle (Lex Talionis) often associated with the Old Testament, is sometimes misunderstood as literal. While the principle is present in the Torah, Jewish legal tradition often interpreted it as monetary compensation or restitution. However, in the case of intentional murder, the law seems clear that the punishment was death.
Legal Due Process: The verse doesn't prescribe the legal processes. However, later legal traditions (both in the Old Testament and in Rabbinic Judaism) developed stringent requirements for convicting someone of murder. These included:
Multiple Eyewitnesses: Two or more reliable witnesses were generally required.
Warning: There were discussions about whether the murderer had to be warned immediately before the act of murder.
No Circumstantial Evidence Alone: A conviction couldn't rest solely on circumstantial evidence.
Blood Vengeance: In ancient societies, the victim's family often had the right or even the obligation to avenge the death (blood vengeance). The legal system outlined in the Old Testament aimed to regulate and limit blood vengeance by establishing courts and laws. The city of refuge provided a safe haven from such vengeance in cases of accidental death.
In Summary:
Exodus 21:12 establishes a fundamental legal principle that taking a human life through intentional violence is a capital crime. However, Jewish legal tradition elaborates significantly on this verse, introducing concepts of intent, distinguishing between types of homicide, and establishing rigorous legal procedures to prevent wrongful convictions. The verse should be understood within the broader context of the Old Testament law and its subsequent interpretations.
Exodus 21:12 - “One who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death,
What does "Exodus 21:12" mean?
Exodus 21:12, "One who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death," establishes the principle that intentional killing is a capital offense, punishable by death. Here's a breakdown of what it means and the context surrounding it:
"One who strikes a man...": This refers to a person who physically assaults another person. The Hebrew word for "strikes" (נכה, nakah) implies a forceful blow.
"...so that he dies...": This is the crucial consequence: the assault leads directly to the victim's death.
"...shall surely be put to death.": This states the mandatory punishment for the perpetrator: capital punishment (execution).
Key Interpretations and Nuances:
Intent: While the verse itself doesn't explicitly state "intentional," Jewish legal interpretation (particularly in the Talmud) does emphasize intent. The Rabbis differentiated between:
Intentional Murder (with premeditation): This is the situation this verse primarily addresses. It requires a deliberate plan and a clear intention to kill. This would have carried the most severe penalty.
Unintentional Manslaughter: Later verses in the chapter (specifically Exodus 21:13) deal with cases where the death was accidental, without malice or intent. In such cases, the person could flee to a designated "city of refuge" for protection from blood vengeance.
Negligent Homicide: This might cover situations where someone's carelessness or recklessness led to a death, but without a direct intention to harm. Punishments for this could vary but would be less severe than intentional murder.
"Eye for an Eye" vs. Monetary Compensation: It's important to note that the "eye for an eye" principle (Lex Talionis) often associated with the Old Testament, is sometimes misunderstood as literal. While the principle is present in the Torah, Jewish legal tradition often interpreted it as monetary compensation or restitution. However, in the case of intentional murder, the law seems clear that the punishment was death.
Legal Due Process: The verse doesn't prescribe the legal processes. However, later legal traditions (both in the Old Testament and in Rabbinic Judaism) developed stringent requirements for convicting someone of murder. These included:
Multiple Eyewitnesses: Two or more reliable witnesses were generally required.
Warning: There were discussions about whether the murderer had to be warned immediately before the act of murder.
No Circumstantial Evidence Alone: A conviction couldn't rest solely on circumstantial evidence.
Blood Vengeance: In ancient societies, the victim's family often had the right or even the obligation to avenge the death (blood vengeance). The legal system outlined in the Old Testament aimed to regulate and limit blood vengeance by establishing courts and laws. The city of refuge provided a safe haven from such vengeance in cases of accidental death.
In Summary:
Exodus 21:12 establishes a fundamental legal principle that taking a human life through intentional violence is a capital crime. However, Jewish legal tradition elaborates significantly on this verse, introducing concepts of intent, distinguishing between types of homicide, and establishing rigorous legal procedures to prevent wrongful convictions. The verse should be understood within the broader context of the Old Testament law and its subsequent interpretations.