2 samuel 19:28 - For all my father’s house were but dead men before my lord the king; yet you set your servant among those who ate at your own table. What right therefore have I yet that I should cry any more to the king?”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "2 samuel 19:28" mean?
This verse is part of Mephibosheth's defense to King David in 2 Samuel 19:28. To understand it, you need some context:
Mephibosheth: He was the grandson of King Saul (David's predecessor and enemy) and the son of Jonathan (David's close friend). He was also lame.
David's Kindness: David had shown kindness to Mephibosheth because of his friendship with Jonathan. He had restored Saul's lands to Mephibosheth and allowed him to eat at the king's table (a sign of high honor and favor).
Ziba's Deception: Ziba, Mephibosheth's servant, had falsely accused Mephibosheth of plotting against David during Absalom's rebellion. Ziba did this to gain Mephibosheth's property. David, believing Ziba, had initially taken Mephibosheth's land and given it to Ziba.
Now, let's break down the verse:
"For all my father’s house were but dead men before my lord the king..." This refers to the fact that after Saul's death, David had the right to eliminate all of Saul's descendants to secure his own kingdom. Mephibosheth is acknowledging that he and his entire family (Saul's house) were essentially at David's mercy and could have been killed. Saul's family were enemies that posed a threat to David's reign.
"...yet you set your servant among those who ate at your own table." This is the crux of Mephibosheth's argument. Despite the potential threat he posed, David showed him immense favor by treating him as a member of the royal household. Eating at the king's table was a huge honor and privilege.
"What right therefore have I yet that I should cry any more to the king?" This is the rhetorical question. Mephibosheth is saying, "Considering the great kindness you've already shown me, a kindness I don't deserve, what right do I have to complain or ask for anything more from you?" He's essentially saying that even if David believes Ziba's lies, he shouldn't complain. David's mercy in sparing his life and giving him a place at the table is already far more than he was entitled to.
In essence, Mephibosheth is:
Expressing gratitude: He acknowledges David's undeserved kindness.
Showing humility: He understands his precarious position and doesn't feel entitled to anything more.
Making a subtle plea: While not directly pleading for his land back, he hopes his loyalty and gratitude will influence David's decision.
Demonstrating loyalty: While he may have lost his land, he's showing that he supports David as King.
Mephibosheth's speech is a masterful display of diplomacy. He is not aggressively defending himself or accusing Ziba directly. Instead, he relies on David's sense of justice and kindness by reminding him of the great favor he had already bestowed upon him. This verse highlights themes of mercy, loyalty, and the complexities of political alliances in the biblical narrative.
2 samuel 19:28 - For all my father’s house were but dead men before my lord the king; yet you set your servant among those who ate at your own table. What right therefore have I yet that I should cry any more to the king?”
What does "2 samuel 19:28" mean?
This verse is part of Mephibosheth's defense to King David in 2 Samuel 19:28. To understand it, you need some context:
Mephibosheth: He was the grandson of King Saul (David's predecessor and enemy) and the son of Jonathan (David's close friend). He was also lame.
David's Kindness: David had shown kindness to Mephibosheth because of his friendship with Jonathan. He had restored Saul's lands to Mephibosheth and allowed him to eat at the king's table (a sign of high honor and favor).
Ziba's Deception: Ziba, Mephibosheth's servant, had falsely accused Mephibosheth of plotting against David during Absalom's rebellion. Ziba did this to gain Mephibosheth's property. David, believing Ziba, had initially taken Mephibosheth's land and given it to Ziba.
Now, let's break down the verse:
"For all my father’s house were but dead men before my lord the king..." This refers to the fact that after Saul's death, David had the right to eliminate all of Saul's descendants to secure his own kingdom. Mephibosheth is acknowledging that he and his entire family (Saul's house) were essentially at David's mercy and could have been killed. Saul's family were enemies that posed a threat to David's reign.
"...yet you set your servant among those who ate at your own table." This is the crux of Mephibosheth's argument. Despite the potential threat he posed, David showed him immense favor by treating him as a member of the royal household. Eating at the king's table was a huge honor and privilege.
"What right therefore have I yet that I should cry any more to the king?" This is the rhetorical question. Mephibosheth is saying, "Considering the great kindness you've already shown me, a kindness I don't deserve, what right do I have to complain or ask for anything more from you?" He's essentially saying that even if David believes Ziba's lies, he shouldn't complain. David's mercy in sparing his life and giving him a place at the table is already far more than he was entitled to.
In essence, Mephibosheth is:
Expressing gratitude: He acknowledges David's undeserved kindness.
Showing humility: He understands his precarious position and doesn't feel entitled to anything more.
Making a subtle plea: While not directly pleading for his land back, he hopes his loyalty and gratitude will influence David's decision.
Demonstrating loyalty: While he may have lost his land, he's showing that he supports David as King.
Mephibosheth's speech is a masterful display of diplomacy. He is not aggressively defending himself or accusing Ziba directly. Instead, he relies on David's sense of justice and kindness by reminding him of the great favor he had already bestowed upon him. This verse highlights themes of mercy, loyalty, and the complexities of political alliances in the biblical narrative.