Numbers 30:7 - and her husband hears it, and hold his peace at her in the day that he hears it; then her vows shall stand, and her bonds with which she has bound her soul shall stand.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Numbers 30:7" mean?
This verse from Numbers 30:7, part of a larger section in Numbers 30 about vows, outlines a specific legal and social situation in ancient Israel concerning a married woman's vows. Let's break it down:
"and her husband hears it": This refers to a situation where a married woman makes a vow or commitment to God. Her husband is present or becomes aware of this vow.
"and hold his peace at her in the day that he hears it": This is the key action. If the husband, upon hearing the vow, remains silent or doesn't object on the same day he hears it, it is considered as tacit approval. The phrase "hold his peace" is crucial. It means he doesn't express disagreement, cancellation, or disapproval of the vow. "In the day that he hears it" emphasizes the immediacy of the situation; his response is time-sensitive.
"then her vows shall stand, and her bonds with which she has bound her soul shall stand": This is the consequence of the husband's silence. Because he didn't object, the vow becomes legally binding. The vow is considered valid and enforceable. The phrase "bonds with which she has bound her soul" is a figurative way of emphasizing the seriousness and commitment the woman made in her vow. It's binding to her and her relationship with God.
In essence, the verse establishes that a married woman's vow is valid if her husband hears it and does not object to it on the day he hears it. His silence constitutes consent.
Context and Interpretation:
Patriarchal Society: It's crucial to understand this verse within the context of the patriarchal society of ancient Israel. The husband had a significant degree of authority over his wife.
Vows as Serious Commitments: Vows were considered very serious promises to God, often involving specific actions, offerings, or abstinences.
Husband's Right to Annul: Numbers 30:6-8 details that a husband could annul his wife's vows, but the act of annulment must happen immediately upon hearing the vow. This verse emphasizes that, if he does not annul the vow at that time, it stands.
Protection or Control?: Interpretations of this passage vary. Some see it as a protection for women. It allows them to make vows, but safeguards against unintended consequences by giving the husband the power to cancel vows that might be impractical or harmful to the family. Others view it as a manifestation of patriarchal control, where a woman's commitments are subject to her husband's approval.
Relevance Today: In modern interpretations, the concept of a husband having the power to nullify a wife's commitments is generally rejected as incompatible with gender equality and individual autonomy. However, the underlying principle of communication and mutual agreement within a marriage, especially regarding significant decisions, can still be relevant. Some might interpret it as the husband having the responsibility to help the wife think through her vows.
In summary, Numbers 30:7 illustrates a legal and social structure in ancient Israel where a married woman's vows were subject to her husband's approval. His silence was interpreted as consent, making the vow binding.
Numbers 30:7 - and her husband hears it, and hold his peace at her in the day that he hears it; then her vows shall stand, and her bonds with which she has bound her soul shall stand.
What does "Numbers 30:7" mean?
This verse from Numbers 30:7, part of a larger section in Numbers 30 about vows, outlines a specific legal and social situation in ancient Israel concerning a married woman's vows. Let's break it down:
"and her husband hears it": This refers to a situation where a married woman makes a vow or commitment to God. Her husband is present or becomes aware of this vow.
"and hold his peace at her in the day that he hears it": This is the key action. If the husband, upon hearing the vow, remains silent or doesn't object on the same day he hears it, it is considered as tacit approval. The phrase "hold his peace" is crucial. It means he doesn't express disagreement, cancellation, or disapproval of the vow. "In the day that he hears it" emphasizes the immediacy of the situation; his response is time-sensitive.
"then her vows shall stand, and her bonds with which she has bound her soul shall stand": This is the consequence of the husband's silence. Because he didn't object, the vow becomes legally binding. The vow is considered valid and enforceable. The phrase "bonds with which she has bound her soul" is a figurative way of emphasizing the seriousness and commitment the woman made in her vow. It's binding to her and her relationship with God.
In essence, the verse establishes that a married woman's vow is valid if her husband hears it and does not object to it on the day he hears it. His silence constitutes consent.
Context and Interpretation:
Patriarchal Society: It's crucial to understand this verse within the context of the patriarchal society of ancient Israel. The husband had a significant degree of authority over his wife.
Vows as Serious Commitments: Vows were considered very serious promises to God, often involving specific actions, offerings, or abstinences.
Husband's Right to Annul: Numbers 30:6-8 details that a husband could annul his wife's vows, but the act of annulment must happen immediately upon hearing the vow. This verse emphasizes that, if he does not annul the vow at that time, it stands.
Protection or Control?: Interpretations of this passage vary. Some see it as a protection for women. It allows them to make vows, but safeguards against unintended consequences by giving the husband the power to cancel vows that might be impractical or harmful to the family. Others view it as a manifestation of patriarchal control, where a woman's commitments are subject to her husband's approval.
Relevance Today: In modern interpretations, the concept of a husband having the power to nullify a wife's commitments is generally rejected as incompatible with gender equality and individual autonomy. However, the underlying principle of communication and mutual agreement within a marriage, especially regarding significant decisions, can still be relevant. Some might interpret it as the husband having the responsibility to help the wife think through her vows.
In summary, Numbers 30:7 illustrates a legal and social structure in ancient Israel where a married woman's vows were subject to her husband's approval. His silence was interpreted as consent, making the vow binding.