Numbers 30:14 - But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day, then he establishes all her vows, or all her bonds, which are on her. He has established them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Numbers 30:14" mean?
This verse from Numbers 30:14 deals with the validity of vows made by a married woman in ancient Israel. It outlines the consequences if the husband, upon hearing his wife's vow, neither approves nor disapproves of it. Here's a breakdown of what it means:
"But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day...": This means if the husband hears his wife make a vow and doesn't say anything about it—doesn't explicitly approve or disapprove—over a period of time (implied to be at least one day). He is silent and passive.
"then he establishes all her vows, or all her bonds, which are on her.": Because the husband remained silent, the vows or obligations she has taken upon herself are considered valid and binding. He has effectively ratified her commitments by his silence.
"He has established them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them.": The reason why her vows are now binding is precisely because he didn't speak up or object when he first heard them. His silence is interpreted as implied consent.
In essence, the verse establishes this principle:
A husband has the power to nullify his wife's vows.
However, he must do so promptly, when he first learns of the vow.
If he remains silent, his silence is taken as tacit approval, and the vow becomes fully binding on the wife.
Underlying Principle and Context:
This passage reflects the societal structure of the time, where the husband had authority over his wife. However, it also introduces a level of responsibility for the husband. He cannot simply ignore his wife's commitments. He must be aware and actively participate in determining their validity. This ensures she's not making vows that could be detrimental to the family or to her own well-being, but it also means the wife can make legal commitments that are binding if the husband does not object.
Modern Interpretations and Considerations:
It's important to remember that this verse comes from a specific historical and cultural context. Modern interpretations often consider the following:
Equality: The idea that a husband has absolute authority over his wife's vows is generally incompatible with modern concepts of gender equality and individual autonomy.
Personal Responsibility: While the historical context emphasizes the husband's role, modern readers might focus on the importance of careful consideration and responsible decision-making by both individuals before making vows or commitments.
In conclusion, Numbers 30:14 outlines a legal principle where a husband's silence implies consent to his wife's vows, making them binding. While the verse reflects a patriarchal societal structure, it also highlights the importance of communication and responsibility in agreements and commitments. The passage is most relevant for understanding the historical legal and social norms of the time, rather than offering prescriptive advice for modern relationships.
Numbers 30:14 - But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day, then he establishes all her vows, or all her bonds, which are on her. He has established them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them.
What does "Numbers 30:14" mean?
This verse from Numbers 30:14 deals with the validity of vows made by a married woman in ancient Israel. It outlines the consequences if the husband, upon hearing his wife's vow, neither approves nor disapproves of it. Here's a breakdown of what it means:
"But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day...": This means if the husband hears his wife make a vow and doesn't say anything about it—doesn't explicitly approve or disapprove—over a period of time (implied to be at least one day). He is silent and passive.
"then he establishes all her vows, or all her bonds, which are on her.": Because the husband remained silent, the vows or obligations she has taken upon herself are considered valid and binding. He has effectively ratified her commitments by his silence.
"He has established them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them.": The reason why her vows are now binding is precisely because he didn't speak up or object when he first heard them. His silence is interpreted as implied consent.
In essence, the verse establishes this principle:
A husband has the power to nullify his wife's vows.
However, he must do so promptly, when he first learns of the vow.
If he remains silent, his silence is taken as tacit approval, and the vow becomes fully binding on the wife.
Underlying Principle and Context:
This passage reflects the societal structure of the time, where the husband had authority over his wife. However, it also introduces a level of responsibility for the husband. He cannot simply ignore his wife's commitments. He must be aware and actively participate in determining their validity. This ensures she's not making vows that could be detrimental to the family or to her own well-being, but it also means the wife can make legal commitments that are binding if the husband does not object.
Modern Interpretations and Considerations:
It's important to remember that this verse comes from a specific historical and cultural context. Modern interpretations often consider the following:
Equality: The idea that a husband has absolute authority over his wife's vows is generally incompatible with modern concepts of gender equality and individual autonomy.
Personal Responsibility: While the historical context emphasizes the husband's role, modern readers might focus on the importance of careful consideration and responsible decision-making by both individuals before making vows or commitments.
In conclusion, Numbers 30:14 outlines a legal principle where a husband's silence implies consent to his wife's vows, making them binding. While the verse reflects a patriarchal societal structure, it also highlights the importance of communication and responsibility in agreements and commitments. The passage is most relevant for understanding the historical legal and social norms of the time, rather than offering prescriptive advice for modern relationships.