Matthew 27:24 - So when Pilate saw that nothing was being gained, but rather that a disturbance was starting, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this righteous person. You see to it.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Matthew 27:24" mean?
Matthew 27:24 describes Pontius Pilate's action after attempting to dissuade the crowd from demanding Jesus' crucifixion. Let's break down the meaning:
"So when Pilate saw that nothing was being gained, but rather that a disturbance was starting..." This sets the context. Pilate had tried various tactics (appealing to their sense of justice, offering to release a different prisoner) to save Jesus. He realized his efforts were futile. The crowd was becoming more agitated and a riot was threatening to break out. Roman governors feared unrest above all else.
"...he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude..." This is the key action. Handwashing was a symbolic act, common in Jewish tradition, representing a cleansing of guilt or responsibility. Pilate, by publicly washing his hands, was attempting to publicly declare that he wasn't responsible for Jesus' death. He was essentially saying, "I don't want this blood on my hands."
"...saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this righteous person. You see to it.”" This clarifies the symbolism. Pilate explicitly states his innocence. He believes Jesus is a righteous (innocent) man, yet he passes the responsibility for the decision to the crowd. "You see to it" is a way of saying, "I'm relinquishing control; the decision is yours, and so is the responsibility."
Therefore, the verse means:
Pilate, fearing a riot and believing Jesus to be innocent, tries to absolve himself of the moral responsibility for Jesus's impending execution by performing a symbolic handwashing and publicly declaring his innocence. He then places the burden of the decision and its consequences squarely on the crowd.
Interpretations and Significance:
Pilate's Weakness: The passage is often interpreted as highlighting Pilate's political weakness. He knew Jesus was innocent but lacked the courage to stand up to the crowd and protect him. He prioritized maintaining order and his own position over justice.
Shifting of Blame: While Pilate attempted to shift blame, Christian theology typically holds that all of humanity shares in the responsibility for Jesus's death due to sin. The crowd's response (in Matthew 27:25) of "His blood be on us and on our children!" is seen as tragically accepting this responsibility.
Symbolic Act vs. Actual Innocence: It's important to note that washing his hands didn't actually make Pilate innocent. He still had the power to intervene. The act was more of a political maneuver to protect himself.
In conclusion, Matthew 27:24 is a complex verse that reveals Pilate's moral cowardice, his attempt to escape responsibility, and sets the stage for the crucifixion narrative. It serves as a reminder of the power of public opinion and the consequences of prioritizing self-preservation over justice.
Matthew 27:24 - So when Pilate saw that nothing was being gained, but rather that a disturbance was starting, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this righteous person. You see to it.”
What does "Matthew 27:24" mean?
Matthew 27:24 describes Pontius Pilate's action after attempting to dissuade the crowd from demanding Jesus' crucifixion. Let's break down the meaning:
"So when Pilate saw that nothing was being gained, but rather that a disturbance was starting..." This sets the context. Pilate had tried various tactics (appealing to their sense of justice, offering to release a different prisoner) to save Jesus. He realized his efforts were futile. The crowd was becoming more agitated and a riot was threatening to break out. Roman governors feared unrest above all else.
"...he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude..." This is the key action. Handwashing was a symbolic act, common in Jewish tradition, representing a cleansing of guilt or responsibility. Pilate, by publicly washing his hands, was attempting to publicly declare that he wasn't responsible for Jesus' death. He was essentially saying, "I don't want this blood on my hands."
"...saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this righteous person. You see to it.”" This clarifies the symbolism. Pilate explicitly states his innocence. He believes Jesus is a righteous (innocent) man, yet he passes the responsibility for the decision to the crowd. "You see to it" is a way of saying, "I'm relinquishing control; the decision is yours, and so is the responsibility."
Therefore, the verse means:
Pilate, fearing a riot and believing Jesus to be innocent, tries to absolve himself of the moral responsibility for Jesus's impending execution by performing a symbolic handwashing and publicly declaring his innocence. He then places the burden of the decision and its consequences squarely on the crowd.
Interpretations and Significance:
Pilate's Weakness: The passage is often interpreted as highlighting Pilate's political weakness. He knew Jesus was innocent but lacked the courage to stand up to the crowd and protect him. He prioritized maintaining order and his own position over justice.
Shifting of Blame: While Pilate attempted to shift blame, Christian theology typically holds that all of humanity shares in the responsibility for Jesus's death due to sin. The crowd's response (in Matthew 27:25) of "His blood be on us and on our children!" is seen as tragically accepting this responsibility.
Symbolic Act vs. Actual Innocence: It's important to note that washing his hands didn't actually make Pilate innocent. He still had the power to intervene. The act was more of a political maneuver to protect himself.
In conclusion, Matthew 27:24 is a complex verse that reveals Pilate's moral cowardice, his attempt to escape responsibility, and sets the stage for the crucifixion narrative. It serves as a reminder of the power of public opinion and the consequences of prioritizing self-preservation over justice.