Matthew 26:9 - For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Matthew 26:9" mean?
This verse, "For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor," comes from the story of a woman anointing Jesus with very expensive ointment in Matthew 26:6-13 (and similar accounts in Mark 14:3-9 and John 12:1-8).
The context is crucial for understanding its meaning:
The Setting: Jesus is in Bethany at the house of Simon the Leper. A woman (identified as Mary in John's Gospel) pours a very costly ointment (often described as spikenard) on Jesus' head or feet.
The Objection: Some of the disciples, particularly Judas Iscariot in John's Gospel, object to the woman's act. They argue that the ointment was incredibly valuable and could have been sold to raise money for the poor. This verse is the heart of that objection.
Interpretation:
Surface Level: At face value, the statement seems logical and charitable. The ointment had significant monetary value. Selling it would have provided funds that could have been used to help the impoverished.
Deeper Meaning & Critiques: However, Jesus defends the woman's actions and rebukes the objectors. Several interpretations arise:
Priorities & Timing: Jesus suggests that there will always be opportunities to care for the poor, but his own time on earth is limited. This anointing, therefore, is a special act of love, devotion, and possibly a prophetic foreshadowing of his upcoming death and burial. (Jesus often hinted or directly stated he was going to be killed)
Sincere vs. Insincere Motives: Some interpretations suggest the disciples' concern for the poor wasn't entirely genuine. In John's Gospel, it's explicitly stated that Judas cared little for the poor, and his objection stemmed from his desire to steal the money. Other disciples may have been influenced by Judas or genuinely believed it was wasteful.
Sacrifice and Love: The woman's act is seen as a profound sacrifice and expression of love and gratitude toward Jesus. It demonstrates a willingness to give something of great value to honor him, regardless of the perceived "practicality" of the action. She understands Jesus's worth and that he is worth more than the price of the ointment.
Foreshadowing: Many see the anointing as a symbolic preparation for Jesus' burial. By anointing him before his death, the woman is fulfilling a cultural custom and demonstrating her understanding of his impending fate. She is doing this out of love for him and is acting appropriately.
In summary:
The verse highlights a conflict between two perspectives: practical, charitable action versus sacrificial devotion and prophetic understanding. Jesus uses the situation to teach about priorities, the value of genuine love, and the significance of his impending death and resurrection. The objections to the woman's anointing are not about the value of helping the poor, but rather an unwillingness to accept Jesus's value.
Matthew 26:9 - For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.”
What does "Matthew 26:9" mean?
This verse, "For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor," comes from the story of a woman anointing Jesus with very expensive ointment in Matthew 26:6-13 (and similar accounts in Mark 14:3-9 and John 12:1-8).
The context is crucial for understanding its meaning:
The Setting: Jesus is in Bethany at the house of Simon the Leper. A woman (identified as Mary in John's Gospel) pours a very costly ointment (often described as spikenard) on Jesus' head or feet.
The Objection: Some of the disciples, particularly Judas Iscariot in John's Gospel, object to the woman's act. They argue that the ointment was incredibly valuable and could have been sold to raise money for the poor. This verse is the heart of that objection.
Interpretation:
Surface Level: At face value, the statement seems logical and charitable. The ointment had significant monetary value. Selling it would have provided funds that could have been used to help the impoverished.
Deeper Meaning & Critiques: However, Jesus defends the woman's actions and rebukes the objectors. Several interpretations arise:
Priorities & Timing: Jesus suggests that there will always be opportunities to care for the poor, but his own time on earth is limited. This anointing, therefore, is a special act of love, devotion, and possibly a prophetic foreshadowing of his upcoming death and burial. (Jesus often hinted or directly stated he was going to be killed)
Sincere vs. Insincere Motives: Some interpretations suggest the disciples' concern for the poor wasn't entirely genuine. In John's Gospel, it's explicitly stated that Judas cared little for the poor, and his objection stemmed from his desire to steal the money. Other disciples may have been influenced by Judas or genuinely believed it was wasteful.
Sacrifice and Love: The woman's act is seen as a profound sacrifice and expression of love and gratitude toward Jesus. It demonstrates a willingness to give something of great value to honor him, regardless of the perceived "practicality" of the action. She understands Jesus's worth and that he is worth more than the price of the ointment.
Foreshadowing: Many see the anointing as a symbolic preparation for Jesus' burial. By anointing him before his death, the woman is fulfilling a cultural custom and demonstrating her understanding of his impending fate. She is doing this out of love for him and is acting appropriately.
In summary:
The verse highlights a conflict between two perspectives: practical, charitable action versus sacrificial devotion and prophetic understanding. Jesus uses the situation to teach about priorities, the value of genuine love, and the significance of his impending death and resurrection. The objections to the woman's anointing are not about the value of helping the poor, but rather an unwillingness to accept Jesus's value.