Matthew 17:24 - When they had come to Capernaum, those who collected the didrachma coins came to Peter, and said, “Doesn’t your teacher pay the didrachma?”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Matthew 17:24" mean?
This verse from Matthew 17:24 refers to a tax levied on Jewish men, specifically to support the upkeep of the Temple in Jerusalem. Let's break it down:
"When they had come to Capernaum": This sets the scene. Capernaum was a town on the Sea of Galilee, and a place where Jesus spent a significant amount of time, even being considered his "own city" (Matthew 9:1).
"those who collected the didrachma coins": The didrachma was a Greek coin equivalent to two drachmas. In this context, it refers to the annual Temple tax levied on all Jewish men aged 20 and older. It was a fixed amount, not based on income. The collectors were likely officials or agents authorized to collect this tax. Some scholars believe these collectors were not directly employed by the Temple, but rather were independent contractors collecting the tax for profit.
"came to Peter, and said, 'Doesn’t your teacher pay the didrachma?'": The collectors approached Peter, likely because he was a prominent disciple and often spoke for the group. Their question, "Doesn't your teacher pay the didrachma?", implies a potential challenge or insinuation. They were questioning whether Jesus, as a Jewish man, was fulfilling his religious obligation to contribute to the Temple.
Key Interpretations and Significance:
Religious Obligation: The didrachma was seen as a religious obligation for Jewish men. By questioning Peter, the collectors were essentially asking if Jesus considered himself bound by Jewish law and customs.
Jesus's Relationship to the Temple: The passage raises questions about Jesus's relationship to the Temple. He often challenged the religious establishment and their practices. This verse sets the stage for Jesus's response, which explores the nature of his authority and obligation to the Temple.
Jesus's Authority and Kingship: In the subsequent verses (Matthew 17:25-27), Jesus uses the analogy of earthly kings and their subjects to illustrate his point. He suggests that, as the "Son" (a reference to divine sonship), he is not obligated to pay the tax for his "Father's" house (the Temple). However, to avoid causing offense, he instructs Peter to catch a fish, in whose mouth they will find a coin sufficient to pay the tax for both of them. This highlights Jesus's willingness to submit to earthly authorities for the sake of peace and to avoid stumbling blocks, while also subtly asserting his unique authority.
In summary, Matthew 17:24 introduces the issue of the Temple tax, setting the stage for Jesus's teaching on obligation, authority, and his unique relationship to the Temple and God.
Matthew 17:24 - When they had come to Capernaum, those who collected the didrachma coins came to Peter, and said, “Doesn’t your teacher pay the didrachma?”
What does "Matthew 17:24" mean?
This verse from Matthew 17:24 refers to a tax levied on Jewish men, specifically to support the upkeep of the Temple in Jerusalem. Let's break it down:
"When they had come to Capernaum": This sets the scene. Capernaum was a town on the Sea of Galilee, and a place where Jesus spent a significant amount of time, even being considered his "own city" (Matthew 9:1).
"those who collected the didrachma coins": The didrachma was a Greek coin equivalent to two drachmas. In this context, it refers to the annual Temple tax levied on all Jewish men aged 20 and older. It was a fixed amount, not based on income. The collectors were likely officials or agents authorized to collect this tax. Some scholars believe these collectors were not directly employed by the Temple, but rather were independent contractors collecting the tax for profit.
"came to Peter, and said, 'Doesn’t your teacher pay the didrachma?'": The collectors approached Peter, likely because he was a prominent disciple and often spoke for the group. Their question, "Doesn't your teacher pay the didrachma?", implies a potential challenge or insinuation. They were questioning whether Jesus, as a Jewish man, was fulfilling his religious obligation to contribute to the Temple.
Key Interpretations and Significance:
Religious Obligation: The didrachma was seen as a religious obligation for Jewish men. By questioning Peter, the collectors were essentially asking if Jesus considered himself bound by Jewish law and customs.
Jesus's Relationship to the Temple: The passage raises questions about Jesus's relationship to the Temple. He often challenged the religious establishment and their practices. This verse sets the stage for Jesus's response, which explores the nature of his authority and obligation to the Temple.
Jesus's Authority and Kingship: In the subsequent verses (Matthew 17:25-27), Jesus uses the analogy of earthly kings and their subjects to illustrate his point. He suggests that, as the "Son" (a reference to divine sonship), he is not obligated to pay the tax for his "Father's" house (the Temple). However, to avoid causing offense, he instructs Peter to catch a fish, in whose mouth they will find a coin sufficient to pay the tax for both of them. This highlights Jesus's willingness to submit to earthly authorities for the sake of peace and to avoid stumbling blocks, while also subtly asserting his unique authority.
In summary, Matthew 17:24 introduces the issue of the Temple tax, setting the stage for Jesus's teaching on obligation, authority, and his unique relationship to the Temple and God.