Matthew 12:4 - how he entered into God’s house, and ate the show bread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for those who were with him, but only for the priests? 1 Samuel 21:3-6
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Matthew 12:4" mean?
This verse in Matthew 12:4 is Jesus referencing a story from 1 Samuel 21:1-6 to make a point about the interpretation of religious law. Let's break down what it means:
The Story of David and the Showbread (1 Samuel 21:1-6): David, fleeing from King Saul, arrives at the tabernacle in Nob, hungry and without provisions. He asks the priest Ahimelech for food. Ahimelech only has consecrated bread, called "showbread" or "bread of the Presence," which had been placed before God. Normally, this bread was reserved only for the priests to eat after it was replaced with fresh bread. However, Ahimelech, after confirming that David's men were ceremonially clean (i.e., had abstained from sexual activity), gives David and his men the showbread to eat.
Jesus' Use of the Story in Matthew 12:4: Jesus is in a conflict with the Pharisees, who are criticizing his disciples for picking grain on the Sabbath, which they consider unlawful. Jesus responds by citing several examples from the Hebrew scriptures to demonstrate that there are times when human need overrides strict adherence to religious law.
The Argument: Jesus is essentially arguing that human need and compassion are more important than rigidly following religious rules. He uses the David story to illustrate that even the law (in this case, the law about who could eat the showbread) could be set aside in exceptional circumstances, like when people are hungry. David and his men were in a life-threatening situation due to hunger, and the priest prioritized their need over strict adherence to the law.
Key Takeaways:
Balance of Law and Mercy: Jesus' use of this example highlights the importance of understanding the spirit of the law, not just the letter of the law. He emphasizes that the law should serve human beings, not the other way around.
Prioritization of Human Need: Jesus places a high value on meeting the needs of people, particularly those in distress.
Authority and Interpretation: Jesus is subtly asserting his own authority to interpret and apply the scriptures, challenging the Pharisees' rigid and often legalistic approach.
In summary, the verse in Matthew 12:4 uses the historical example of David eating the showbread to argue that human need can sometimes take precedence over religious rules, especially when those rules would cause unnecessary hardship or suffering. It's a commentary on the proper interpretation of religious law and the importance of compassion.
Matthew 12:4 - how he entered into God’s house, and ate the show bread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for those who were with him, but only for the priests? 1 Samuel 21:3-6
What does "Matthew 12:4" mean?
This verse in Matthew 12:4 is Jesus referencing a story from 1 Samuel 21:1-6 to make a point about the interpretation of religious law. Let's break down what it means:
The Story of David and the Showbread (1 Samuel 21:1-6): David, fleeing from King Saul, arrives at the tabernacle in Nob, hungry and without provisions. He asks the priest Ahimelech for food. Ahimelech only has consecrated bread, called "showbread" or "bread of the Presence," which had been placed before God. Normally, this bread was reserved only for the priests to eat after it was replaced with fresh bread. However, Ahimelech, after confirming that David's men were ceremonially clean (i.e., had abstained from sexual activity), gives David and his men the showbread to eat.
Jesus' Use of the Story in Matthew 12:4: Jesus is in a conflict with the Pharisees, who are criticizing his disciples for picking grain on the Sabbath, which they consider unlawful. Jesus responds by citing several examples from the Hebrew scriptures to demonstrate that there are times when human need overrides strict adherence to religious law.
The Argument: Jesus is essentially arguing that human need and compassion are more important than rigidly following religious rules. He uses the David story to illustrate that even the law (in this case, the law about who could eat the showbread) could be set aside in exceptional circumstances, like when people are hungry. David and his men were in a life-threatening situation due to hunger, and the priest prioritized their need over strict adherence to the law.
Key Takeaways:
Balance of Law and Mercy: Jesus' use of this example highlights the importance of understanding the spirit of the law, not just the letter of the law. He emphasizes that the law should serve human beings, not the other way around.
Prioritization of Human Need: Jesus places a high value on meeting the needs of people, particularly those in distress.
Authority and Interpretation: Jesus is subtly asserting his own authority to interpret and apply the scriptures, challenging the Pharisees' rigid and often legalistic approach.
In summary, the verse in Matthew 12:4 uses the historical example of David eating the showbread to argue that human need can sometimes take precedence over religious rules, especially when those rules would cause unnecessary hardship or suffering. It's a commentary on the proper interpretation of religious law and the importance of compassion.