Mark 13:20 - Unless the Lord had shortened the days, no flesh would have been saved; but for the sake of the chosen ones, whom he picked out, he shortened the days.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Mark 13:20" mean?
Mark 13:20 is a difficult verse that has been interpreted in various ways over the centuries. Here's a breakdown of the common interpretations, along with the key elements:
Key Elements:
"Unless the Lord had shortened the days...": This refers to a period of intense tribulation or suffering. The "days" are days of hardship, persecution, and destruction.
"...no flesh would have been saved...": "Flesh" is often interpreted as meaning all human beings, or all living creatures. The implication is that the tribulation would be so severe that it would lead to the complete extinction of humanity or a significant portion of it.
"...but for the sake of the chosen ones, whom he picked out...": This introduces the concept of a group of people who are specially favored or chosen by God. They are the reason for the intervention.
"...he shortened the days.": This is the crucial point: God intervened to limit the duration of the tribulation. He acted to alleviate the suffering and prevent total annihilation.
Common Interpretations:
1. The Destruction of Jerusalem (70 AD):
This is a very common and historically grounded interpretation. Many scholars believe that Mark 13 (including this verse) primarily refers to the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman army in 70 AD.
Explanation: The siege and destruction of Jerusalem were incredibly brutal. Without divine intervention (in this view, limiting the scope of the destruction), the Jewish people (or, more broadly, the inhabitants of the region) could have been completely wiped out. The "chosen ones" would be the early Christians who were able to escape Jerusalem before the siege, following Jesus's warnings in the preceding verses of Mark 13. God "shortened the days" of the siege, perhaps by allowing some to escape or by limiting the overall damage (though it was still devastating).
Strengths: Fits the historical context of the Gospel of Mark. Aligns with the other prophecies in Mark 13 that seem to describe events leading up to and including the destruction of the Temple.
Weaknesses: Some feel it limits the scope of Jesus's prophecy too much and doesn't account for the language that could be interpreted as pointing to a future, more universal tribulation.
2. A Future Great Tribulation (End Times):
This view interprets the verse as referring to a future period of intense suffering that will precede the Second Coming of Christ.
Explanation: The "days" represent the period of this future tribulation. "No flesh" means that humanity would be destroyed if this time of tribulation were allowed to continue indefinitely. The "chosen ones" are those believers who will be alive during this time. God, in his mercy, will shorten the tribulation to prevent total annihilation and to preserve a remnant of believers.
Strengths: Aligns with some interpretations of other prophetic passages in the Bible that speak of a final, great tribulation. The language of near-total destruction feels appropriate for a globally significant event.
Weaknesses: Can be difficult to reconcile with the historical context of Mark 13 and the destruction of Jerusalem. Requires a more symbolic or allegorical reading of "days" and "flesh."
3. Both (A Dual Fulfillment):
Some scholars argue that the prophecy in Mark 13 has both a near-term fulfillment (the destruction of Jerusalem) and a far-term fulfillment (a future tribulation). The destruction of Jerusalem is seen as a "type" or foreshadowing of a greater tribulation to come.
Explanation: The verse applies to both the events of 70 AD (where God intervened to prevent total annihilation of the Jewish people/early Christians) and to a future tribulation (where God will intervene to prevent the annihilation of humanity).
Strengths: Attempts to reconcile the historical and futuristic interpretations. Recognizes the progressive and multi-layered nature of biblical prophecy.
Weaknesses: Can be seen as a compromise that doesn't fully commit to either interpretation.
In Summary:
Mark 13:20 speaks of a period of intense suffering that threatens widespread destruction. God, in his mercy and for the sake of his chosen people, will intervene to shorten this period of tribulation. Whether this refers primarily to the destruction of Jerusalem, a future "end times" tribulation, or both, is a matter of ongoing debate. The core message is God's ultimate control over history and his protection of those who are faithful to him.
To Understand It Better:
Read the Entire Chapter (Mark 13): Pay attention to the context of the verses surrounding it.
Consider the Historical Context: Research the destruction of Jerusalem and its impact on the early church.
Consult Different Commentaries: Read what different scholars and theologians have said about this verse.
Pray for Understanding: Ask God to give you insight into the meaning of the passage.
Mark 13:20 - Unless the Lord had shortened the days, no flesh would have been saved; but for the sake of the chosen ones, whom he picked out, he shortened the days.
What does "Mark 13:20" mean?
Mark 13:20 is a difficult verse that has been interpreted in various ways over the centuries. Here's a breakdown of the common interpretations, along with the key elements:
Key Elements:
"Unless the Lord had shortened the days...": This refers to a period of intense tribulation or suffering. The "days" are days of hardship, persecution, and destruction.
"...no flesh would have been saved...": "Flesh" is often interpreted as meaning all human beings, or all living creatures. The implication is that the tribulation would be so severe that it would lead to the complete extinction of humanity or a significant portion of it.
"...but for the sake of the chosen ones, whom he picked out...": This introduces the concept of a group of people who are specially favored or chosen by God. They are the reason for the intervention.
"...he shortened the days.": This is the crucial point: God intervened to limit the duration of the tribulation. He acted to alleviate the suffering and prevent total annihilation.
Common Interpretations:
1. The Destruction of Jerusalem (70 AD):
This is a very common and historically grounded interpretation. Many scholars believe that Mark 13 (including this verse) primarily refers to the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman army in 70 AD.
Explanation: The siege and destruction of Jerusalem were incredibly brutal. Without divine intervention (in this view, limiting the scope of the destruction), the Jewish people (or, more broadly, the inhabitants of the region) could have been completely wiped out. The "chosen ones" would be the early Christians who were able to escape Jerusalem before the siege, following Jesus's warnings in the preceding verses of Mark 13. God "shortened the days" of the siege, perhaps by allowing some to escape or by limiting the overall damage (though it was still devastating).
Strengths: Fits the historical context of the Gospel of Mark. Aligns with the other prophecies in Mark 13 that seem to describe events leading up to and including the destruction of the Temple.
Weaknesses: Some feel it limits the scope of Jesus's prophecy too much and doesn't account for the language that could be interpreted as pointing to a future, more universal tribulation.
2. A Future Great Tribulation (End Times):
This view interprets the verse as referring to a future period of intense suffering that will precede the Second Coming of Christ.
Explanation: The "days" represent the period of this future tribulation. "No flesh" means that humanity would be destroyed if this time of tribulation were allowed to continue indefinitely. The "chosen ones" are those believers who will be alive during this time. God, in his mercy, will shorten the tribulation to prevent total annihilation and to preserve a remnant of believers.
Strengths: Aligns with some interpretations of other prophetic passages in the Bible that speak of a final, great tribulation. The language of near-total destruction feels appropriate for a globally significant event.
Weaknesses: Can be difficult to reconcile with the historical context of Mark 13 and the destruction of Jerusalem. Requires a more symbolic or allegorical reading of "days" and "flesh."
3. Both (A Dual Fulfillment):
Some scholars argue that the prophecy in Mark 13 has both a near-term fulfillment (the destruction of Jerusalem) and a far-term fulfillment (a future tribulation). The destruction of Jerusalem is seen as a "type" or foreshadowing of a greater tribulation to come.
Explanation: The verse applies to both the events of 70 AD (where God intervened to prevent total annihilation of the Jewish people/early Christians) and to a future tribulation (where God will intervene to prevent the annihilation of humanity).
Strengths: Attempts to reconcile the historical and futuristic interpretations. Recognizes the progressive and multi-layered nature of biblical prophecy.
Weaknesses: Can be seen as a compromise that doesn't fully commit to either interpretation.
In Summary:
Mark 13:20 speaks of a period of intense suffering that threatens widespread destruction. God, in his mercy and for the sake of his chosen people, will intervene to shorten this period of tribulation. Whether this refers primarily to the destruction of Jerusalem, a future "end times" tribulation, or both, is a matter of ongoing debate. The core message is God's ultimate control over history and his protection of those who are faithful to him.
To Understand It Better:
Read the Entire Chapter (Mark 13): Pay attention to the context of the verses surrounding it.
Consider the Historical Context: Research the destruction of Jerusalem and its impact on the early church.
Consult Different Commentaries: Read what different scholars and theologians have said about this verse.
Pray for Understanding: Ask God to give you insight into the meaning of the passage.