Mark 12:19 - “Teacher, Moses wrote to us, ‘If a man’s brother dies, and leaves a wife behind him, and leaves no children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up offspring for his brother.’
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Mark 12:19" mean?
This verse, Mark 12:19, describes the ancient Jewish law of levirate marriage. Let's break it down:
"Teacher, Moses wrote to us..." The Sadducees, who do not believe in the resurrection, are posing a hypothetical question to Jesus. They're framing it as a direct application of Mosaic Law, trying to trap him.
"...‘If a man’s brother dies, and leaves a wife behind him, and leaves no children..." This sets up the scenario. A man dies. He has a brother, and he had a wife, but he died without having any children with her.
"...that his brother should take his wife, and raise up offspring for his brother.’" This is the core of the levirate marriage law. The surviving brother is obligated to marry his deceased brother's widow. The purpose of this union is not just to provide for the widow, but primarily to continue the deceased brother's lineage.
Purpose of Levirate Marriage:
The main purpose behind levirate marriage was to ensure the deceased brother's name and inheritance would continue. In ancient Jewish culture, having male descendants was considered extremely important for several reasons:
Maintaining the Family Name: The family name was carried on through the male line. The death of a man without sons was seen as a loss of heritage.
Inheritance: Property and land were passed down through the male line. If a man died without sons, his inheritance might be lost to the family.
Spiritual Significance: In some interpretations, it was also seen as a way to ensure the deceased man's connection to the land and the covenant with God.
Important Considerations:
Obligation, Not Choice: The surviving brother was obligated to marry the widow. This wasn't just a suggestion or a romantic option.
Firstborn Son's Status: The firstborn son of the levirate marriage was considered the legal heir of the deceased brother, not the surviving brother. This ensured that the deceased brother's lineage was carried on.
Refusal Option: There was a legal mechanism to avoid levirate marriage if the surviving brother didn't want to go through with it. It involved a public ceremony where the widow would humiliate the brother by removing his sandal (Deuteronomy 25:5-10). This was a shameful act for the brother, suggesting he was unwilling to fulfill his duty.
In the context of Mark 12:19:
The Sadducees present this scenario to Jesus as part of a larger thought experiment. They create a hypothetical situation where seven brothers successively marry the same woman, each dying without children. Their question is, "In the resurrection, whose wife will she be, since all seven had married her?"
They use this to try and ridicule the idea of the resurrection, arguing that it leads to absurd and impossible scenarios. Jesus then counters their argument by explaining that marriage is not a part of the resurrected life.
In short, the verse itself illustrates an important aspect of ancient Jewish law regarding family, inheritance, and the continuation of lineage, but it's primarily being used by the Sadducees in an attempt to trip Jesus up.
Mark 12:19 - “Teacher, Moses wrote to us, ‘If a man’s brother dies, and leaves a wife behind him, and leaves no children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up offspring for his brother.’
What does "Mark 12:19" mean?
This verse, Mark 12:19, describes the ancient Jewish law of levirate marriage. Let's break it down:
"Teacher, Moses wrote to us..." The Sadducees, who do not believe in the resurrection, are posing a hypothetical question to Jesus. They're framing it as a direct application of Mosaic Law, trying to trap him.
"...‘If a man’s brother dies, and leaves a wife behind him, and leaves no children..." This sets up the scenario. A man dies. He has a brother, and he had a wife, but he died without having any children with her.
"...that his brother should take his wife, and raise up offspring for his brother.’" This is the core of the levirate marriage law. The surviving brother is obligated to marry his deceased brother's widow. The purpose of this union is not just to provide for the widow, but primarily to continue the deceased brother's lineage.
Purpose of Levirate Marriage:
The main purpose behind levirate marriage was to ensure the deceased brother's name and inheritance would continue. In ancient Jewish culture, having male descendants was considered extremely important for several reasons:
Maintaining the Family Name: The family name was carried on through the male line. The death of a man without sons was seen as a loss of heritage.
Inheritance: Property and land were passed down through the male line. If a man died without sons, his inheritance might be lost to the family.
Spiritual Significance: In some interpretations, it was also seen as a way to ensure the deceased man's connection to the land and the covenant with God.
Important Considerations:
Obligation, Not Choice: The surviving brother was obligated to marry the widow. This wasn't just a suggestion or a romantic option.
Firstborn Son's Status: The firstborn son of the levirate marriage was considered the legal heir of the deceased brother, not the surviving brother. This ensured that the deceased brother's lineage was carried on.
Refusal Option: There was a legal mechanism to avoid levirate marriage if the surviving brother didn't want to go through with it. It involved a public ceremony where the widow would humiliate the brother by removing his sandal (Deuteronomy 25:5-10). This was a shameful act for the brother, suggesting he was unwilling to fulfill his duty.
In the context of Mark 12:19:
The Sadducees present this scenario to Jesus as part of a larger thought experiment. They create a hypothetical situation where seven brothers successively marry the same woman, each dying without children. Their question is, "In the resurrection, whose wife will she be, since all seven had married her?"
They use this to try and ridicule the idea of the resurrection, arguing that it leads to absurd and impossible scenarios. Jesus then counters their argument by explaining that marriage is not a part of the resurrected life.
In short, the verse itself illustrates an important aspect of ancient Jewish law regarding family, inheritance, and the continuation of lineage, but it's primarily being used by the Sadducees in an attempt to trip Jesus up.