Luke 20:6 - But if we say, ‘From men,’ all the people will stone us, for they are persuaded that John was a prophet.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Luke 20:6" mean?
This verse from Luke 20:6 highlights a political and social dilemma faced by religious leaders questioning Jesus' authority. Let's break it down:
Context: The verse is part of a larger passage (Luke 20:1-8) where Jesus is teaching in the temple. Chief priests, scribes, and elders challenge his authority, asking "Tell us by what authority you are doing these things, or who it is that gave you this authority?"
The Dilemma: Jesus cleverly responds with a question of his own: "Was the baptism of John from heaven or from man?" This puts the religious leaders in a difficult position.
"But if we say, ‘From men’…": If they answer that John's baptism was merely a human invention, it would undermine their position and credibility.
"…all the people will stone us, for they are persuaded that John was a prophet.": This is the heart of the verse. The leaders fear the consequences of denying John's prophetic status because:
Popular Opinion: The people generally believed that John the Baptist was a true prophet sent by God.
Public Backlash: If the leaders contradicted this popular belief, they risked angering the crowds, potentially leading to violence (stoning was a common form of punishment).
Political Motivation: The leaders' concern wasn't necessarily about genuine theological conviction, but about maintaining their power and influence. They were more concerned with their reputation and avoiding public unrest than with seeking the truth.
Avoidance: Faced with this dilemma, the religious leaders choose to evade answering the question directly. They claim they don't know where John's authority came from, which allows Jesus to avoid answering their initial question about his own authority.
In essence, Luke 20:6 reveals the hypocrisy and political maneuvering of the religious leaders. They were more concerned with maintaining their power and avoiding public disapproval than with honestly assessing the evidence about John the Baptist and, by extension, Jesus himself.
Luke 20:6 - But if we say, ‘From men,’ all the people will stone us, for they are persuaded that John was a prophet.”
What does "Luke 20:6" mean?
This verse from Luke 20:6 highlights a political and social dilemma faced by religious leaders questioning Jesus' authority. Let's break it down:
Context: The verse is part of a larger passage (Luke 20:1-8) where Jesus is teaching in the temple. Chief priests, scribes, and elders challenge his authority, asking "Tell us by what authority you are doing these things, or who it is that gave you this authority?"
The Dilemma: Jesus cleverly responds with a question of his own: "Was the baptism of John from heaven or from man?" This puts the religious leaders in a difficult position.
"But if we say, ‘From men’…": If they answer that John's baptism was merely a human invention, it would undermine their position and credibility.
"…all the people will stone us, for they are persuaded that John was a prophet.": This is the heart of the verse. The leaders fear the consequences of denying John's prophetic status because:
Popular Opinion: The people generally believed that John the Baptist was a true prophet sent by God.
Public Backlash: If the leaders contradicted this popular belief, they risked angering the crowds, potentially leading to violence (stoning was a common form of punishment).
Political Motivation: The leaders' concern wasn't necessarily about genuine theological conviction, but about maintaining their power and influence. They were more concerned with their reputation and avoiding public unrest than with seeking the truth.
Avoidance: Faced with this dilemma, the religious leaders choose to evade answering the question directly. They claim they don't know where John's authority came from, which allows Jesus to avoid answering their initial question about his own authority.
In essence, Luke 20:6 reveals the hypocrisy and political maneuvering of the religious leaders. They were more concerned with maintaining their power and avoiding public disapproval than with honestly assessing the evidence about John the Baptist and, by extension, Jesus himself.