Leviticus 25:31 - But the houses of the villages which have no wall around them shall be accounted for with the fields of the country: they may be redeemed, and they shall be released in the Jubilee.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Leviticus 25:31" mean?
This verse from Leviticus 25:31 deals with the rules regarding the redemption and release of property, specifically houses in unwalled villages, within the Israelite agricultural system. Let's break down what it means:
"But the houses of the villages which have no wall around them...": This sets the context. It's specifically talking about houses located in smaller, unprotected villages - villages without defensive walls. This is important because the rules are different for houses within walled cities (mentioned elsewhere in Leviticus).
"...shall be accounted for with the fields of the country...": This is the key difference. Houses in unwalled villages are treated like agricultural land (fields) rather than like urban dwellings. This means they are subject to the same redemption and Jubilee rules as farmland.
"...they may be redeemed...": "Redeemed" refers to the right of a relative (kinsman-redeemer) to buy back property that has been sold due to financial hardship. If an Israelite had to sell their house in an unwalled village, a relative could buy it back (redeem it) for them, effectively preventing the family from permanently losing their ancestral land and home.
"...and they shall be released in the Jubilee.": The Jubilee year (occurring every 50 years) was a time of restoration. In the Jubilee year, all sold land (including houses in unwalled villages) automatically reverted back to its original owner, regardless of whether it had been redeemed or not. This was a way to prevent families from being permanently dispossessed of their land and resources, ensuring a cyclical redistribution of wealth and opportunity.
In summary:
Houses in unwalled villages were considered part of the agricultural system. They could be redeemed by relatives to prevent permanent loss of property, and regardless of redemption, they were always returned to their original owner during the Jubilee year. This verse highlights the importance of land ownership and social justice within the Israelite community, providing a mechanism for the restoration of property and preventing perpetual poverty.
Why this distinction between walled and unwalled villages?
The distinction likely stems from the different economic and social structures of cities versus rural areas. Walled cities were often more commercial centers, and houses within them were more likely to be considered investments. Houses in unwalled villages, on the other hand, were more directly tied to agricultural livelihoods and family heritage. The Jubilee law was designed to protect families' access to land for sustenance, making it especially relevant to those in rural areas. Also, walled cities could be considered permanent fixtures, whereas unwalled villages could shrink or be absorbed by the land, which is what this verse reflects.
Leviticus 25:31 - But the houses of the villages which have no wall around them shall be accounted for with the fields of the country: they may be redeemed, and they shall be released in the Jubilee.
What does "Leviticus 25:31" mean?
This verse from Leviticus 25:31 deals with the rules regarding the redemption and release of property, specifically houses in unwalled villages, within the Israelite agricultural system. Let's break down what it means:
"But the houses of the villages which have no wall around them...": This sets the context. It's specifically talking about houses located in smaller, unprotected villages - villages without defensive walls. This is important because the rules are different for houses within walled cities (mentioned elsewhere in Leviticus).
"...shall be accounted for with the fields of the country...": This is the key difference. Houses in unwalled villages are treated like agricultural land (fields) rather than like urban dwellings. This means they are subject to the same redemption and Jubilee rules as farmland.
"...they may be redeemed...": "Redeemed" refers to the right of a relative (kinsman-redeemer) to buy back property that has been sold due to financial hardship. If an Israelite had to sell their house in an unwalled village, a relative could buy it back (redeem it) for them, effectively preventing the family from permanently losing their ancestral land and home.
"...and they shall be released in the Jubilee.": The Jubilee year (occurring every 50 years) was a time of restoration. In the Jubilee year, all sold land (including houses in unwalled villages) automatically reverted back to its original owner, regardless of whether it had been redeemed or not. This was a way to prevent families from being permanently dispossessed of their land and resources, ensuring a cyclical redistribution of wealth and opportunity.
In summary:
Houses in unwalled villages were considered part of the agricultural system. They could be redeemed by relatives to prevent permanent loss of property, and regardless of redemption, they were always returned to their original owner during the Jubilee year. This verse highlights the importance of land ownership and social justice within the Israelite community, providing a mechanism for the restoration of property and preventing perpetual poverty.
Why this distinction between walled and unwalled villages?
The distinction likely stems from the different economic and social structures of cities versus rural areas. Walled cities were often more commercial centers, and houses within them were more likely to be considered investments. Houses in unwalled villages, on the other hand, were more directly tied to agricultural livelihoods and family heritage. The Jubilee law was designed to protect families' access to land for sustenance, making it especially relevant to those in rural areas. Also, walled cities could be considered permanent fixtures, whereas unwalled villages could shrink or be absorbed by the land, which is what this verse reflects.