Leviticus 21:18 - For whatever man he is that has a defect, he shall not draw near: a blind man, or a lame, or he who has a flat nose, or any deformity,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Leviticus 21:18" mean?
Leviticus 21:18 is part of a larger section (Leviticus 21:16-24) that outlines the qualifications for priests. Specifically, this verse lists physical disabilities that would disqualify a man from serving as a priest in the sanctuary.
Here's a breakdown of what the verse means within its historical and religious context:
Context: The book of Leviticus deals with the laws and rituals governing the Israelites' relationship with God. Purity and holiness are central themes. Priests were seen as mediators between God and the people, and therefore needed to be set apart and held to a high standard of ritual purity.
"For whatever man he is that has a defect, he shall not draw near": This sets the general rule: a man with a physical "defect" (Hebrew: mum) is disqualified. "Draw near" means approaching the altar to offer sacrifices or performing other priestly duties in the most holy parts of the tabernacle or temple.
"A blind man, or a lame, or he who has a flat nose, or any deformity": This provides specific examples of disqualifying defects. It's important to note that these are just examples; the phrase "any deformity" suggests the list isn't exhaustive. "Flat nose" (Hebrew: ḥōrem) is a difficult term to translate precisely, and some scholars suggest it could refer to a broader range of nasal disfigurements.
Interpretations and Possible Reasons for the Law:
There are several possible reasons scholars give for why such physical requirements existed:
1. Symbolic Representation: Priests were meant to be representative of God's perfection and holiness. Physical imperfections might have been seen as a reflection of sin or brokenness, thus disqualifying them from perfectly representing God.
2. Practical Considerations: Some scholars argue that certain disabilities might have made it difficult for priests to perform their duties effectively. For example, a blind or lame priest might have struggled to navigate the sanctuary or perform sacrifices properly.
3. Aesthetic Reasons: In ancient cultures, physical beauty was often associated with status and favor. The priests, being a visible representation of the nation's relationship with God, may have been expected to meet certain aesthetic standards. This is a more controversial interpretation.
4. Preventing Ridicule: The physical imperfections of the priest might lead to public ridicule and scorn for the sanctuary as a whole.
Important Considerations:
This law applied specifically to priests: It did not apply to all Israelites, nor did it imply that people with disabilities were somehow less worthy or valuable.
The New Testament Perspective: Many Christians believe that the sacrificial system and the laws governing it were fulfilled in Jesus Christ. As a result, these laws are no longer binding on believers. The New Testament emphasizes spiritual purity and inner transformation over outward appearances. See Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Context is Crucial: It's essential to understand the historical and cultural context of Leviticus to interpret these laws accurately. Reading them through a modern lens without considering the ancient world can lead to misunderstandings.
In conclusion, Leviticus 21:18 reflects a set of rules about who could serve as a priest in ancient Israel. The law likely had symbolic, practical, and potentially aesthetic motivations related to the holiness and purity expected of those who served God in the sanctuary. However, understanding the full context and implications of this verse requires careful study and consideration.
Leviticus 21:18 - For whatever man he is that has a defect, he shall not draw near: a blind man, or a lame, or he who has a flat nose, or any deformity,
What does "Leviticus 21:18" mean?
Leviticus 21:18 is part of a larger section (Leviticus 21:16-24) that outlines the qualifications for priests. Specifically, this verse lists physical disabilities that would disqualify a man from serving as a priest in the sanctuary.
Here's a breakdown of what the verse means within its historical and religious context:
Context: The book of Leviticus deals with the laws and rituals governing the Israelites' relationship with God. Purity and holiness are central themes. Priests were seen as mediators between God and the people, and therefore needed to be set apart and held to a high standard of ritual purity.
"For whatever man he is that has a defect, he shall not draw near": This sets the general rule: a man with a physical "defect" (Hebrew: mum) is disqualified. "Draw near" means approaching the altar to offer sacrifices or performing other priestly duties in the most holy parts of the tabernacle or temple.
"A blind man, or a lame, or he who has a flat nose, or any deformity": This provides specific examples of disqualifying defects. It's important to note that these are just examples; the phrase "any deformity" suggests the list isn't exhaustive. "Flat nose" (Hebrew: ḥōrem) is a difficult term to translate precisely, and some scholars suggest it could refer to a broader range of nasal disfigurements.
Interpretations and Possible Reasons for the Law:
There are several possible reasons scholars give for why such physical requirements existed:
1. Symbolic Representation: Priests were meant to be representative of God's perfection and holiness. Physical imperfections might have been seen as a reflection of sin or brokenness, thus disqualifying them from perfectly representing God.
2. Practical Considerations: Some scholars argue that certain disabilities might have made it difficult for priests to perform their duties effectively. For example, a blind or lame priest might have struggled to navigate the sanctuary or perform sacrifices properly.
3. Aesthetic Reasons: In ancient cultures, physical beauty was often associated with status and favor. The priests, being a visible representation of the nation's relationship with God, may have been expected to meet certain aesthetic standards. This is a more controversial interpretation.
4. Preventing Ridicule: The physical imperfections of the priest might lead to public ridicule and scorn for the sanctuary as a whole.
Important Considerations:
This law applied specifically to priests: It did not apply to all Israelites, nor did it imply that people with disabilities were somehow less worthy or valuable.
The New Testament Perspective: Many Christians believe that the sacrificial system and the laws governing it were fulfilled in Jesus Christ. As a result, these laws are no longer binding on believers. The New Testament emphasizes spiritual purity and inner transformation over outward appearances. See Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Context is Crucial: It's essential to understand the historical and cultural context of Leviticus to interpret these laws accurately. Reading them through a modern lens without considering the ancient world can lead to misunderstandings.
In conclusion, Leviticus 21:18 reflects a set of rules about who could serve as a priest in ancient Israel. The law likely had symbolic, practical, and potentially aesthetic motivations related to the holiness and purity expected of those who served God in the sanctuary. However, understanding the full context and implications of this verse requires careful study and consideration.