Leviticus 13:41 - If his hair has fallen off from the front part of his head, he is forehead bald. He is clean.

Generated Verse: Leviticus 13:41

What does "Leviticus 13:41" mean?


This verse from Leviticus 13:41 deals with the laws concerning skin diseases and ritual purity in ancient Israel. Let's break it down:

"If his hair has fallen off from the front part of his head, he is forehead bald." This simply describes a person experiencing baldness in the front of their head, resulting in a receding hairline or a bald patch on their forehead.

"He is clean." This is the crucial part. In the context of Leviticus, "clean" doesn't necessarily mean hygienic. It means the person is ritually pure and not considered to have a defiling skin disease that would require them to be separated from the community.

In essence, the verse states that having a receding hairline or bald spot on the forehead does not make a person ritually unclean according to Levitical law.

Why this distinction?

The laws in Leviticus were often concerned with outward signs that might indicate contagious or defiling diseases. Certain skin conditions were considered highly contagious and required isolation. However, common baldness was not considered one of these conditions. Therefore, a person with a receding hairline was not subject to the same restrictions as someone with a potentially infectious skin disease.

Important Considerations:

Context is Key: It's essential to understand this verse within the broader context of Leviticus 13, which details various skin diseases and their associated rituals.
Not a Medical Diagnosis: This verse is not a medical diagnosis or opinion on the health implications of baldness. It is purely concerned with ritual purity and social inclusion within ancient Israel.
Focus on Ritual Purity: The concept of "clean" in Leviticus is primarily about ritual purity, not physical cleanliness in the modern sense. It was related to participating in religious ceremonies and being part of the community.

What categories does "Leviticus 13:41" have?