Leviticus 11:5 - The cony, because he chews the cud but doesn’t have a parted hoof, he is unclean to you.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Leviticus 11:5" mean?
Leviticus 11 outlines which animals are considered "clean" (permitted for consumption) and "unclean" (forbidden). Verse 5 focuses on the cony, also known as a hyrax or rock badger. The verse states that the cony is unclean because it chews its cud (appears to ruminate) but does not have a parted (cloven) hoof.
Here's a breakdown:
"The cony...": Refers to the hyrax or rock badger, a small, herbivorous mammal found in Africa and the Middle East.
"...because he chews the cud...": Conies appear to be chewing their cud, but they do not have the ruminant digestive system of animals like cows and sheep. They have a different process of digestion. It was common in ancient times to misunderstand their digestive habits.
"...but doesn’t have a parted hoof...": "Parted hoof" (also called "cloven hoof") refers to a hoof that is split into two distinct toes, like those found on cattle, sheep, goats, and deer. Conies have padded feet with nails, not cloven hooves.
"...he is unclean to you.": According to the dietary laws outlined in Leviticus, animals that both chew the cud and have cloven hooves are considered clean. Because the cony doesn't meet both criteria, it is deemed unclean and thus not permitted to be eaten by those following these laws.
In essence, this verse identifies the cony as an animal that doesn't fit the specific criteria for being considered "clean" under Jewish dietary laws due to its peculiar chewing behavior and lack of a cloven hoof.
Why are these criteria important?
The precise reasons for these dietary laws are complex and debated:
Hygiene/Health: Some theories suggest these laws were based on ancient understanding of hygiene and health.
Symbolic/Ritual Purity: Others propose that the rules were symbolic, representing holiness and separation from other nations.
Economic or Social Factors: It's also possible that economic or social factors played a role in which animals were deemed acceptable for consumption.
Regardless of the original rationale, this verse demonstrates how specific characteristics of animals were used to determine their "cleanliness" according to Levitical law.
Leviticus 11:5 - The cony, because he chews the cud but doesn’t have a parted hoof, he is unclean to you.
What does "Leviticus 11:5" mean?
Leviticus 11 outlines which animals are considered "clean" (permitted for consumption) and "unclean" (forbidden). Verse 5 focuses on the cony, also known as a hyrax or rock badger. The verse states that the cony is unclean because it chews its cud (appears to ruminate) but does not have a parted (cloven) hoof.
Here's a breakdown:
"The cony...": Refers to the hyrax or rock badger, a small, herbivorous mammal found in Africa and the Middle East.
"...because he chews the cud...": Conies appear to be chewing their cud, but they do not have the ruminant digestive system of animals like cows and sheep. They have a different process of digestion. It was common in ancient times to misunderstand their digestive habits.
"...but doesn’t have a parted hoof...": "Parted hoof" (also called "cloven hoof") refers to a hoof that is split into two distinct toes, like those found on cattle, sheep, goats, and deer. Conies have padded feet with nails, not cloven hooves.
"...he is unclean to you.": According to the dietary laws outlined in Leviticus, animals that both chew the cud and have cloven hooves are considered clean. Because the cony doesn't meet both criteria, it is deemed unclean and thus not permitted to be eaten by those following these laws.
In essence, this verse identifies the cony as an animal that doesn't fit the specific criteria for being considered "clean" under Jewish dietary laws due to its peculiar chewing behavior and lack of a cloven hoof.
Why are these criteria important?
The precise reasons for these dietary laws are complex and debated:
Hygiene/Health: Some theories suggest these laws were based on ancient understanding of hygiene and health.
Symbolic/Ritual Purity: Others propose that the rules were symbolic, representing holiness and separation from other nations.
Economic or Social Factors: It's also possible that economic or social factors played a role in which animals were deemed acceptable for consumption.
Regardless of the original rationale, this verse demonstrates how specific characteristics of animals were used to determine their "cleanliness" according to Levitical law.