Leviticus 11:36 - Nevertheless a spring or a cistern in which water is gathered shall be clean: but that which touches their carcass shall be unclean.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Leviticus 11:36" mean?
Leviticus 11 deals with laws about clean and unclean animals. Verse 36, specifically, addresses the issue of ritual impurity transmitted by contact with the carcass of an unclean animal and makes an important distinction:
"Nevertheless a spring or a cistern in which water is gathered shall be clean...": This refers to a natural spring or a man-made cistern that collects water. The key point is that a naturally flowing spring or a large reservoir of water is considered inherently clean and not easily defiled. The sheer volume and constant replenishment or contained nature of the water are seen as providing a degree of purification or resistance to impurity.
"...but that which touches their carcass shall be unclean.": This reinforces the general rule that contact with the carcass of an unclean animal transmits ritual impurity. Something that touches the dead animal becomes ritually unclean.
In summary, the verse contrasts the relative immunity of large water sources to impurity with the ease of transmitting impurity through direct contact with a dead, unclean animal.
Here's a breakdown of the meaning and implications:
Context of Ritual Purity: This verse is part of a system of ritual purity laws, which were a central aspect of ancient Israelite religious life. These laws governed who could participate in certain religious activities and enter sacred spaces like the Temple.
Impurity is Not Necessarily Hygiene: It's important to understand that "unclean" in this context doesn't necessarily mean unhygienic in the modern sense. It's about a state of ritual disqualification, not necessarily physical dirtiness.
Water as a Purifying Agent: Water often plays a role in purification rituals in many religions, including Judaism. While this verse suggests that large water sources are less susceptible to impurity, other passages specify how water can be used to cleanse someone or something that has become ritually unclean.
Practical Implications: The distinction made in this verse had practical implications for daily life. People needed to know when they needed to undergo purification rituals. For example, if a dead mouse fell into a small bucket of water, that water would be considered unclean, but if it fell into a large cistern, the cistern's water would likely remain ritually pure.
In conclusion, Leviticus 11:36 provides a specific ruling about how to regard potential sources of ritual impurity, highlighting the relative resilience of large water sources to contamination from the carcasses of unclean animals, while also emphasizing the impurity resulting from direct contact with such a carcass.
Leviticus 11:36 - Nevertheless a spring or a cistern in which water is gathered shall be clean: but that which touches their carcass shall be unclean.
What does "Leviticus 11:36" mean?
Leviticus 11 deals with laws about clean and unclean animals. Verse 36, specifically, addresses the issue of ritual impurity transmitted by contact with the carcass of an unclean animal and makes an important distinction:
"Nevertheless a spring or a cistern in which water is gathered shall be clean...": This refers to a natural spring or a man-made cistern that collects water. The key point is that a naturally flowing spring or a large reservoir of water is considered inherently clean and not easily defiled. The sheer volume and constant replenishment or contained nature of the water are seen as providing a degree of purification or resistance to impurity.
"...but that which touches their carcass shall be unclean.": This reinforces the general rule that contact with the carcass of an unclean animal transmits ritual impurity. Something that touches the dead animal becomes ritually unclean.
In summary, the verse contrasts the relative immunity of large water sources to impurity with the ease of transmitting impurity through direct contact with a dead, unclean animal.
Here's a breakdown of the meaning and implications:
Context of Ritual Purity: This verse is part of a system of ritual purity laws, which were a central aspect of ancient Israelite religious life. These laws governed who could participate in certain religious activities and enter sacred spaces like the Temple.
Impurity is Not Necessarily Hygiene: It's important to understand that "unclean" in this context doesn't necessarily mean unhygienic in the modern sense. It's about a state of ritual disqualification, not necessarily physical dirtiness.
Water as a Purifying Agent: Water often plays a role in purification rituals in many religions, including Judaism. While this verse suggests that large water sources are less susceptible to impurity, other passages specify how water can be used to cleanse someone or something that has become ritually unclean.
Practical Implications: The distinction made in this verse had practical implications for daily life. People needed to know when they needed to undergo purification rituals. For example, if a dead mouse fell into a small bucket of water, that water would be considered unclean, but if it fell into a large cistern, the cistern's water would likely remain ritually pure.
In conclusion, Leviticus 11:36 provides a specific ruling about how to regard potential sources of ritual impurity, highlighting the relative resilience of large water sources to contamination from the carcasses of unclean animals, while also emphasizing the impurity resulting from direct contact with such a carcass.