Leviticus 10:16 - Moses diligently inquired about the goat of the sin offering, and, behold, it was burned: and he was angry with Eleazar and with Ithamar, the sons of Aaron who were left, saying,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Leviticus 10:16" mean?
This verse describes a significant moment of tension and anger in the aftermath of the tragic deaths of Nadab and Abihu, Aaron's other two sons. Let's break it down:
"Moses diligently inquired about the goat of the sin offering..." After the consecration ceremony and the strange fire incident, the prescribed sacrifices still needed to be carried out. Moses, acting as the leader, was ensuring that everything was done according to God's commands. He was specifically checking on the goat that was designated for the sin offering.
"...and, behold, it was burned..." This is the crucial point. The goat of the sin offering should not have been completely burned. According to the instructions in Leviticus, portions of the sin offering were to be eaten by the priests within the holy place. Burning the entire offering was a deviation from the established ritual.
"...and he was angry with Eleazar and with Ithamar, the sons of Aaron who were left, saying..." Eleazar and Ithamar were Aaron's remaining sons, who were now responsible for carrying out the priestly duties. Moses was angry because they had failed to follow the proper procedure regarding the sin offering. His anger stemmed from a concern for obedience to God's commands, especially in light of the recent and severe consequences of disobedience (Nadab and Abihu's deaths).
In summary, the verse indicates that Moses was upset because Eleazar and Ithamar had burned the entire sin offering goat instead of eating a portion of it as instructed. This signifies a failure to adhere to God's prescribed rituals, which was a serious concern for Moses.
Why was this so important?
Obedience is paramount: The incident highlights the importance of meticulous obedience to God's instructions. Even seemingly small deviations could have significant consequences.
Symbolic meaning of the sin offering: The sin offering was designed to atone for unintentional sins. The act of the priests eating a portion of it symbolized their participation in bearing the burden of the people's sins. Burning the entire offering negated this symbolic action.
Maintaining holiness: The sacredness of the tabernacle and the rituals performed there required precise adherence to God's commands to maintain holiness and avoid further divine judgment.
The following verses (Leviticus 10:17-20) will detail Moses' specific accusation and the explanation (or excuse) given by Eleazar and Ithamar, as well as Moses' response. This incident emphasizes the importance of precise obedience, the consequences of deviation, and the ongoing challenge of maintaining holiness in the presence of a holy God.
Leviticus 10:16 - Moses diligently inquired about the goat of the sin offering, and, behold, it was burned: and he was angry with Eleazar and with Ithamar, the sons of Aaron who were left, saying,
What does "Leviticus 10:16" mean?
This verse describes a significant moment of tension and anger in the aftermath of the tragic deaths of Nadab and Abihu, Aaron's other two sons. Let's break it down:
"Moses diligently inquired about the goat of the sin offering..." After the consecration ceremony and the strange fire incident, the prescribed sacrifices still needed to be carried out. Moses, acting as the leader, was ensuring that everything was done according to God's commands. He was specifically checking on the goat that was designated for the sin offering.
"...and, behold, it was burned..." This is the crucial point. The goat of the sin offering should not have been completely burned. According to the instructions in Leviticus, portions of the sin offering were to be eaten by the priests within the holy place. Burning the entire offering was a deviation from the established ritual.
"...and he was angry with Eleazar and with Ithamar, the sons of Aaron who were left, saying..." Eleazar and Ithamar were Aaron's remaining sons, who were now responsible for carrying out the priestly duties. Moses was angry because they had failed to follow the proper procedure regarding the sin offering. His anger stemmed from a concern for obedience to God's commands, especially in light of the recent and severe consequences of disobedience (Nadab and Abihu's deaths).
In summary, the verse indicates that Moses was upset because Eleazar and Ithamar had burned the entire sin offering goat instead of eating a portion of it as instructed. This signifies a failure to adhere to God's prescribed rituals, which was a serious concern for Moses.
Why was this so important?
Obedience is paramount: The incident highlights the importance of meticulous obedience to God's instructions. Even seemingly small deviations could have significant consequences.
Symbolic meaning of the sin offering: The sin offering was designed to atone for unintentional sins. The act of the priests eating a portion of it symbolized their participation in bearing the burden of the people's sins. Burning the entire offering negated this symbolic action.
Maintaining holiness: The sacredness of the tabernacle and the rituals performed there required precise adherence to God's commands to maintain holiness and avoid further divine judgment.
The following verses (Leviticus 10:17-20) will detail Moses' specific accusation and the explanation (or excuse) given by Eleazar and Ithamar, as well as Moses' response. This incident emphasizes the importance of precise obedience, the consequences of deviation, and the ongoing challenge of maintaining holiness in the presence of a holy God.