Judges 19:4 - His father-in-law, the young lady’s father, kept him there; and he stayed with him three days. So they ate and drank, and stayed there.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Judges 19:4" mean?
This verse from Judges 19:4 describes a scene where the Levite, who is visiting his estranged concubine (or wife, interpretations vary), is being pressured by her father to stay longer. Let's break it down:
"His father-in-law, the young lady’s father, kept him there": This means the father of the woman (who is the Levite's father-in-law) strongly urged, or possibly even insisted, that the Levite stay. He didn't want him to leave. The word "kept" implies more than just a polite invitation; it suggests an element of persuasion, possibly even bordering on coercion.
"and he stayed with him three days": The Levite, despite perhaps initial reluctance, ended up remaining at his father-in-law's house for three days.
"So they ate and drank, and stayed there": This indicates that the three days were spent in hospitality and feasting. "Ate and drank" suggests more than just sustenance; it implies a convivial atmosphere, meant to build rapport and enjoyment. The final "stayed there" reinforces the point that the Levite was dwelling at his father-in-law's house, under his influence.
Key implications and interpretations:
Hospitality vs. Coercion: The father-in-law's actions could be seen as generous hospitality, typical of the culture, aimed at repairing the relationship between the Levite and his daughter. However, the word "kept" hints at a more forceful or manipulative aspect. He may have felt guilty for his daughter's departure or wanted to secure the Levite's continued support for her.
Implied Marital Discord: The fact that the woman had left the Levite and returned to her father's house suggests marital problems. The father-in-law's insistence on the Levite staying could be an attempt to mediate the situation and reconcile the couple.
Foreshadowing Tragedy: This seemingly innocent scene of hospitality and feasting sets the stage for the horrific events that follow in Judges 19. The Levite's eventual departure, and the circumstances surrounding it, lead to a shocking act of violence and a subsequent civil war in Israel. The delay caused by the father-in-law, even if well-intentioned, contributes to the chain of events.
In short, Judges 19:4 paints a picture of a strained family dynamic, where hospitality and perhaps ulterior motives intertwine. The seemingly innocuous delay will contribute to a catastrophic series of events, highlighting the themes of moral decay and societal breakdown that characterize the book of Judges.
Judges 19:4 - His father-in-law, the young lady’s father, kept him there; and he stayed with him three days. So they ate and drank, and stayed there.
What does "Judges 19:4" mean?
This verse from Judges 19:4 describes a scene where the Levite, who is visiting his estranged concubine (or wife, interpretations vary), is being pressured by her father to stay longer. Let's break it down:
"His father-in-law, the young lady’s father, kept him there": This means the father of the woman (who is the Levite's father-in-law) strongly urged, or possibly even insisted, that the Levite stay. He didn't want him to leave. The word "kept" implies more than just a polite invitation; it suggests an element of persuasion, possibly even bordering on coercion.
"and he stayed with him three days": The Levite, despite perhaps initial reluctance, ended up remaining at his father-in-law's house for three days.
"So they ate and drank, and stayed there": This indicates that the three days were spent in hospitality and feasting. "Ate and drank" suggests more than just sustenance; it implies a convivial atmosphere, meant to build rapport and enjoyment. The final "stayed there" reinforces the point that the Levite was dwelling at his father-in-law's house, under his influence.
Key implications and interpretations:
Hospitality vs. Coercion: The father-in-law's actions could be seen as generous hospitality, typical of the culture, aimed at repairing the relationship between the Levite and his daughter. However, the word "kept" hints at a more forceful or manipulative aspect. He may have felt guilty for his daughter's departure or wanted to secure the Levite's continued support for her.
Implied Marital Discord: The fact that the woman had left the Levite and returned to her father's house suggests marital problems. The father-in-law's insistence on the Levite staying could be an attempt to mediate the situation and reconcile the couple.
Foreshadowing Tragedy: This seemingly innocent scene of hospitality and feasting sets the stage for the horrific events that follow in Judges 19. The Levite's eventual departure, and the circumstances surrounding it, lead to a shocking act of violence and a subsequent civil war in Israel. The delay caused by the father-in-law, even if well-intentioned, contributes to the chain of events.
In short, Judges 19:4 paints a picture of a strained family dynamic, where hospitality and perhaps ulterior motives intertwine. The seemingly innocuous delay will contribute to a catastrophic series of events, highlighting the themes of moral decay and societal breakdown that characterize the book of Judges.