Judges 11:13 - The king of the children of Ammon answered to the messengers of Jephthah, “Because Israel took away my land, when he came up out of Egypt, from the Arnon even to the Jabbok, and to the Jordan. Now therefore restore that territory again peaceably.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Judges 11:13" mean?
Judges 11:13 records the Ammonite king's explanation for why he was warring against Israel. He claimed that Israel had stolen land from Ammon centuries earlier during their Exodus from Egypt. The disputed territory was a large area bounded by the Arnon River in the south, the Jabbok River in the north, and the Jordan River to the west.
Here's a breakdown:
"The king of the children of Ammon answered to the messengers of Jephthah...": This sets the scene. Jephthah, the judge of Israel, had sent messengers to the Ammonite king to try and resolve the conflict peacefully.
"...“Because Israel took away my land, when he came up out of Egypt, from the Arnon even to the Jabbok, and to the Jordan.": This is the core of the Ammonite king's grievance. He alleges that during the Israelite's Exodus from Egypt, they seized territory that rightfully belonged to Ammon. He specifically defines the land as the area between the Arnon River (the southern border), the Jabbok River (the northern border), and the Jordan River (the western border).
"Now therefore restore that territory again peaceably.”: This is his demand. He wants Israel to return the land that he believes they stole. He says "peaceably", but the context shows that he intends to enforce his claim by force if necessary.
Key implications and background:
Historical Dispute: The Ammonite king is bringing up a historical land dispute from centuries prior. This shows the long-standing tensions between Israel and Ammon.
Territorial Claims: The specified land was a fertile and strategic area, vital for agriculture and control of trade routes.
Counter-Argument (in the following verses): Jephthah, in his reply (Judges 11:15-26), disputes this claim. He argues that Israel didn't take the land from Ammon, but from the Amorites, who had previously conquered it from Moab. He also points out that Israel had possessed the land for 300 years without Ammon disputing it, suggesting that the Ammonite claim was a recent and opportunistic one.
Justification for War: The Ammonite king's statement is an attempt to justify his military aggression against Israel.
In essence, the verse reveals the Ammonite king's rationale for going to war with Israel: he believed they had stolen land generations ago and wanted it back. However, whether his claim was accurate or just a pretext for conquest is a matter of debate, as we see in Jephthah's response.
Judges 11:13 - The king of the children of Ammon answered to the messengers of Jephthah, “Because Israel took away my land, when he came up out of Egypt, from the Arnon even to the Jabbok, and to the Jordan. Now therefore restore that territory again peaceably.”
What does "Judges 11:13" mean?
Judges 11:13 records the Ammonite king's explanation for why he was warring against Israel. He claimed that Israel had stolen land from Ammon centuries earlier during their Exodus from Egypt. The disputed territory was a large area bounded by the Arnon River in the south, the Jabbok River in the north, and the Jordan River to the west.
Here's a breakdown:
"The king of the children of Ammon answered to the messengers of Jephthah...": This sets the scene. Jephthah, the judge of Israel, had sent messengers to the Ammonite king to try and resolve the conflict peacefully.
"...“Because Israel took away my land, when he came up out of Egypt, from the Arnon even to the Jabbok, and to the Jordan.": This is the core of the Ammonite king's grievance. He alleges that during the Israelite's Exodus from Egypt, they seized territory that rightfully belonged to Ammon. He specifically defines the land as the area between the Arnon River (the southern border), the Jabbok River (the northern border), and the Jordan River (the western border).
"Now therefore restore that territory again peaceably.”: This is his demand. He wants Israel to return the land that he believes they stole. He says "peaceably", but the context shows that he intends to enforce his claim by force if necessary.
Key implications and background:
Historical Dispute: The Ammonite king is bringing up a historical land dispute from centuries prior. This shows the long-standing tensions between Israel and Ammon.
Territorial Claims: The specified land was a fertile and strategic area, vital for agriculture and control of trade routes.
Counter-Argument (in the following verses): Jephthah, in his reply (Judges 11:15-26), disputes this claim. He argues that Israel didn't take the land from Ammon, but from the Amorites, who had previously conquered it from Moab. He also points out that Israel had possessed the land for 300 years without Ammon disputing it, suggesting that the Ammonite claim was a recent and opportunistic one.
Justification for War: The Ammonite king's statement is an attempt to justify his military aggression against Israel.
In essence, the verse reveals the Ammonite king's rationale for going to war with Israel: he believed they had stolen land generations ago and wanted it back. However, whether his claim was accurate or just a pretext for conquest is a matter of debate, as we see in Jephthah's response.