John 8:3 - The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman taken in adultery. Having set her in the middle,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "John 8:3" mean?
This verse sets the scene for a famous and controversial episode in the Gospel of John, often called "The Woman Caught in Adultery." Let's break it down:
"The scribes and the Pharisees...": These were two influential groups in Jewish society.
Scribes were experts in Jewish law and scripture. They were responsible for interpreting and teaching the law.
Pharisees were a religious and political group known for their strict adherence to Jewish law and traditions. They often clashed with Jesus over interpretations of the law and issues of religious authority.
"...brought a woman taken in adultery.": They brought a woman who they claimed was caught in the act of adultery. Under Jewish law (specifically, the Law of Moses, as stated in Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22), adultery was a crime punishable by stoning.
"Having set her in the middle...": They placed her in the center of a group of people. This was likely a public space, perhaps the Temple courtyard, where Jesus was teaching. By putting her on display, they aimed to publicly shame her, involve Jesus in a controversial legal issue, and likely to try to trap him.
The significance of this verse:
Entrapment: It sets up a trap for Jesus. If he condoned the stoning, he would be going against Roman law (since the Romans, at the time, generally reserved the right to carry out capital punishment). If he opposed the stoning, he would be accused of undermining Jewish law and Moses himself.
Public shaming: It highlights the public humiliation and condemnation the woman faced. The scribes and Pharisees were not only concerned with the law, but also with publicly shaming the woman and potentially damaging Jesus' reputation.
Moral hypocrisy: The passage implies hypocrisy on the part of the accusers, as Jewish law required both parties in an adulterous act to be punished. The fact that only the woman was brought forward raises questions about the whereabouts and potential status (perhaps a man of influence) of the man involved. The absence of the man suggests an unequal application of the law and a desire to manipulate the situation for their own purposes.
In essence, this verse introduces a situation fraught with legal, religious, and moral complexities, designed to test Jesus' wisdom and authority. The drama of the scene is heightened by the woman's vulnerability and the malicious intent of her accusers.
John 8:3 - The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman taken in adultery. Having set her in the middle,
What does "John 8:3" mean?
This verse sets the scene for a famous and controversial episode in the Gospel of John, often called "The Woman Caught in Adultery." Let's break it down:
"The scribes and the Pharisees...": These were two influential groups in Jewish society.
Scribes were experts in Jewish law and scripture. They were responsible for interpreting and teaching the law.
Pharisees were a religious and political group known for their strict adherence to Jewish law and traditions. They often clashed with Jesus over interpretations of the law and issues of religious authority.
"...brought a woman taken in adultery.": They brought a woman who they claimed was caught in the act of adultery. Under Jewish law (specifically, the Law of Moses, as stated in Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22), adultery was a crime punishable by stoning.
"Having set her in the middle...": They placed her in the center of a group of people. This was likely a public space, perhaps the Temple courtyard, where Jesus was teaching. By putting her on display, they aimed to publicly shame her, involve Jesus in a controversial legal issue, and likely to try to trap him.
The significance of this verse:
Entrapment: It sets up a trap for Jesus. If he condoned the stoning, he would be going against Roman law (since the Romans, at the time, generally reserved the right to carry out capital punishment). If he opposed the stoning, he would be accused of undermining Jewish law and Moses himself.
Public shaming: It highlights the public humiliation and condemnation the woman faced. The scribes and Pharisees were not only concerned with the law, but also with publicly shaming the woman and potentially damaging Jesus' reputation.
Moral hypocrisy: The passage implies hypocrisy on the part of the accusers, as Jewish law required both parties in an adulterous act to be punished. The fact that only the woman was brought forward raises questions about the whereabouts and potential status (perhaps a man of influence) of the man involved. The absence of the man suggests an unequal application of the law and a desire to manipulate the situation for their own purposes.
In essence, this verse introduces a situation fraught with legal, religious, and moral complexities, designed to test Jesus' wisdom and authority. The drama of the scene is heightened by the woman's vulnerability and the malicious intent of her accusers.