John 11:50 - nor do you consider that it is advantageous for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "John 11:50" mean?
This verse, John 11:50, is spoken by Caiaphas, the high priest, during a meeting of the Sanhedrin (the Jewish ruling council). It's a pivotal moment in the lead-up to Jesus's crucifixion. Understanding the meaning requires considering both the literal words and the context in which they were spoken.
Here's a breakdown:
"Nor do you consider that...": This implies that Caiaphas feels the other members of the Sanhedrin are not thinking strategically or practically about the situation. He's frustrated with their hesitation.
"...it is advantageous for us...": Caiaphas is speaking from a position of power and pragmatism. He's concerned about the well-being and stability of the Jewish nation, particularly its leadership (himself included) and the status quo. "Advantageous" refers to what's best for them politically and socially, not necessarily morally.
"...that one man should die for the people...": "One man" refers to Jesus. Caiaphas is suggesting that it would be beneficial, even necessary, for Jesus to be executed. The word "for" is key here. It implies that Jesus's death would be a sacrifice, a substitution, or a means of saving the larger group.
"...and that the whole nation not perish.": This is the crux of Caiaphas's argument. He believes that Jesus's growing popularity and the unrest he's causing are provoking the Roman authorities. He fears that if the Romans perceive Jesus as a threat to their rule, they will crack down on the entire Jewish nation, potentially destroying their temple, their autonomy, and even their very existence. He sees Jesus as a destabilizing force.
In essence, Caiaphas is arguing that sacrificing Jesus is a necessary political maneuver to prevent a greater catastrophe for the entire Jewish nation. It's a utilitarian argument, prioritizing the perceived good of the many over the life of one individual.
However, the deeper meaning comes from the Gospel writer's perspective. John (the author of the Gospel) highlights that Caiaphas's words, while intended as a cynical calculation, unintentionally prophesy the true meaning of Jesus's death. John 11:51-52 says: "He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one."
Therefore, the verse has a double meaning:
1. Caiaphas's perspective: A pragmatic, political decision to sacrifice one man to preserve the nation. A desperate attempt to maintain power and avoid Roman retribution.
2. John's (and the Christian) perspective: An unwitting prophecy of Jesus's sacrificial death, not just for the Jewish people, but for all humanity, to redeem them from sin and unite them with God.
In summary, John 11:50 is a complex verse that reveals the political motivations of the Jewish leadership while simultaneously highlighting the divine plan of salvation through Jesus's death. It's a striking example of how God can work even through the actions and words of those who do not believe in Him.
John 11:50 - nor do you consider that it is advantageous for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.”
What does "John 11:50" mean?
This verse, John 11:50, is spoken by Caiaphas, the high priest, during a meeting of the Sanhedrin (the Jewish ruling council). It's a pivotal moment in the lead-up to Jesus's crucifixion. Understanding the meaning requires considering both the literal words and the context in which they were spoken.
Here's a breakdown:
"Nor do you consider that...": This implies that Caiaphas feels the other members of the Sanhedrin are not thinking strategically or practically about the situation. He's frustrated with their hesitation.
"...it is advantageous for us...": Caiaphas is speaking from a position of power and pragmatism. He's concerned about the well-being and stability of the Jewish nation, particularly its leadership (himself included) and the status quo. "Advantageous" refers to what's best for them politically and socially, not necessarily morally.
"...that one man should die for the people...": "One man" refers to Jesus. Caiaphas is suggesting that it would be beneficial, even necessary, for Jesus to be executed. The word "for" is key here. It implies that Jesus's death would be a sacrifice, a substitution, or a means of saving the larger group.
"...and that the whole nation not perish.": This is the crux of Caiaphas's argument. He believes that Jesus's growing popularity and the unrest he's causing are provoking the Roman authorities. He fears that if the Romans perceive Jesus as a threat to their rule, they will crack down on the entire Jewish nation, potentially destroying their temple, their autonomy, and even their very existence. He sees Jesus as a destabilizing force.
In essence, Caiaphas is arguing that sacrificing Jesus is a necessary political maneuver to prevent a greater catastrophe for the entire Jewish nation. It's a utilitarian argument, prioritizing the perceived good of the many over the life of one individual.
However, the deeper meaning comes from the Gospel writer's perspective. John (the author of the Gospel) highlights that Caiaphas's words, while intended as a cynical calculation, unintentionally prophesy the true meaning of Jesus's death. John 11:51-52 says: "He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one."
Therefore, the verse has a double meaning:
1. Caiaphas's perspective: A pragmatic, political decision to sacrifice one man to preserve the nation. A desperate attempt to maintain power and avoid Roman retribution.
2. John's (and the Christian) perspective: An unwitting prophecy of Jesus's sacrificial death, not just for the Jewish people, but for all humanity, to redeem them from sin and unite them with God.
In summary, John 11:50 is a complex verse that reveals the political motivations of the Jewish leadership while simultaneously highlighting the divine plan of salvation through Jesus's death. It's a striking example of how God can work even through the actions and words of those who do not believe in Him.