Job 6:30 - Is there injustice on my tongue? Can’t my taste discern mischievous things?
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Job 6:30" mean?
Job 6:30, "Is there injustice on my tongue? Can’t my taste discern mischievous things?" is part of Job's extended lament and defense against the accusations (implied or direct) of his friends, particularly Eliphaz. Here's a breakdown of the verse:
"Is there injustice on my tongue?" This is a rhetorical question. Job is asserting that he is not speaking unjustly or uttering wicked things. He's not twisting the truth, lying, or speaking unfairly in his complaints. He's claiming his words, though perhaps harsh and bitter, are ultimately honest expressions of his pain and confusion.
"Can't my taste discern mischievous things?" This uses the metaphor of taste to refer to Job's moral and intellectual discernment. Just as a person can taste something bitter or foul, Job is arguing that he can distinguish between what is good and evil, right and wrong, true and false. "Mischievous things" here can refer to:
Wickedness or evil: Job is saying he can recognize evil when he sees it, both in the world and potentially in his own words. He would not knowingly embrace it.
Deception or falsehood: Job claims he can discern false arguments or misleading statements. His friends are not providing him with solutions, but only insults.
In Summary
Job is defending himself against the idea that he is speaking wickedly or unjustly in his complaints. He is saying:
He is not lying or being deceitful.
He is aware of moral and intellectual right and wrong and is not deliberately embracing what is evil or false.
Context
This verse is important in understanding Job's overall argument:
Defense against accusations: Job believes his friends are misinterpreting his suffering and unfairly judging him as being sinful or deserving of punishment.
Integrity: He is asserting his integrity and his commitment to truth, even in the midst of immense suffering.
Rejection of simplistic explanations: He is pushing back against the simplistic theological explanations that his friends are offering. He is saying that his situation is complex and cannot be easily explained away by saying he is a sinner being punished by God.
Job 6:30 - Is there injustice on my tongue? Can’t my taste discern mischievous things?
What does "Job 6:30" mean?
Job 6:30, "Is there injustice on my tongue? Can’t my taste discern mischievous things?" is part of Job's extended lament and defense against the accusations (implied or direct) of his friends, particularly Eliphaz. Here's a breakdown of the verse:
"Is there injustice on my tongue?" This is a rhetorical question. Job is asserting that he is not speaking unjustly or uttering wicked things. He's not twisting the truth, lying, or speaking unfairly in his complaints. He's claiming his words, though perhaps harsh and bitter, are ultimately honest expressions of his pain and confusion.
"Can't my taste discern mischievous things?" This uses the metaphor of taste to refer to Job's moral and intellectual discernment. Just as a person can taste something bitter or foul, Job is arguing that he can distinguish between what is good and evil, right and wrong, true and false. "Mischievous things" here can refer to:
Wickedness or evil: Job is saying he can recognize evil when he sees it, both in the world and potentially in his own words. He would not knowingly embrace it.
Deception or falsehood: Job claims he can discern false arguments or misleading statements. His friends are not providing him with solutions, but only insults.
In Summary
Job is defending himself against the idea that he is speaking wickedly or unjustly in his complaints. He is saying:
He is not lying or being deceitful.
He is aware of moral and intellectual right and wrong and is not deliberately embracing what is evil or false.
Context
This verse is important in understanding Job's overall argument:
Defense against accusations: Job believes his friends are misinterpreting his suffering and unfairly judging him as being sinful or deserving of punishment.
Integrity: He is asserting his integrity and his commitment to truth, even in the midst of immense suffering.
Rejection of simplistic explanations: He is pushing back against the simplistic theological explanations that his friends are offering. He is saying that his situation is complex and cannot be easily explained away by saying he is a sinner being punished by God.