Job 21:4 is a rhetorical question expressing Job's frustration and indignation at the accusations made against him by his friends. Let's break it down:
"As for me, is my complaint to man?": This implies that Job believes his suffering is beyond human comprehension or resolution. He's not primarily complaining to his friends (Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar). His complaint is ultimately with God, whom he believes is unjustly afflicting him. He's saying, "Is my problem something that humans can even fix or understand? No, it's something much bigger than that." He feels misunderstood and believes his friends are not truly grasping the depth of his suffering.
"Why shouldn't I be impatient?": This is the crux of the verse. Given the magnitude of his suffering and the fact that he believes it is coming from God (even if he doesn't understand why), he feels it's justified to be impatient and even angry. He's saying, "Considering what I'm going through, shouldn't I be allowed to feel frustrated and demand answers?" His impatience stems from his sense of injustice and the lack of understanding and comfort he receives from his friends. He feels they are judging him unfairly and not acknowledging the immense pain he is in.
In Summary:
Job is essentially arguing that:
1. His suffering is a matter beyond human intervention or understanding.
2. His immense pain and the perceived injustice of it make his impatience understandable and even justified.
He is challenging the conventional wisdom of his time (and often even today) that suffering is always a direct result of sin and that one should patiently accept it. Job refuses to simply accept his fate without questioning and seeking understanding. He's not denying God's power, but he is demanding to know why he is being subjected to such hardship.
Job 21:4 is a rhetorical question expressing Job's frustration and indignation at the accusations made against him by his friends. Let's break it down:
"As for me, is my complaint to man?": This implies that Job believes his suffering is beyond human comprehension or resolution. He's not primarily complaining to his friends (Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar). His complaint is ultimately with God, whom he believes is unjustly afflicting him. He's saying, "Is my problem something that humans can even fix or understand? No, it's something much bigger than that." He feels misunderstood and believes his friends are not truly grasping the depth of his suffering.
"Why shouldn't I be impatient?": This is the crux of the verse. Given the magnitude of his suffering and the fact that he believes it is coming from God (even if he doesn't understand why), he feels it's justified to be impatient and even angry. He's saying, "Considering what I'm going through, shouldn't I be allowed to feel frustrated and demand answers?" His impatience stems from his sense of injustice and the lack of understanding and comfort he receives from his friends. He feels they are judging him unfairly and not acknowledging the immense pain he is in.
In Summary:
Job is essentially arguing that:
1. His suffering is a matter beyond human intervention or understanding.
2. His immense pain and the perceived injustice of it make his impatience understandable and even justified.
He is challenging the conventional wisdom of his time (and often even today) that suffering is always a direct result of sin and that one should patiently accept it. Job refuses to simply accept his fate without questioning and seeking understanding. He's not denying God's power, but he is demanding to know why he is being subjected to such hardship.