Job 11:2 - “Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Job 11:2" mean?
Job 11:2 is a rebuke from Zophar, one of Job's friends, expressing his frustration with Job's lengthy and, in Zophar's view, arrogant pronouncements. Let's break down the verse:
"Shouldn't the multitude of words be answered?" This is a rhetorical question implying that Job's excessive talking is overwhelming and deserves a direct response. Zophar believes that Job's lengthy arguments need to be challenged because they are, in his opinion, misguided and wrong. He's suggesting that Job's volume of speech doesn't make it valid.
"Should a man full of talk be justified?" This question goes further, questioning whether simply speaking a lot should automatically lead to someone being considered right or blameless. Zophar is arguing that Job's abundant words don't equate to righteousness or justification. He believes that Job's verbosity is a smokescreen for his actual sins, which Zophar assumes are the cause of Job's suffering.
In essence, Zophar is saying:
Job is talking too much.
His words are overwhelming and demand a rebuttal.
Speaking a lot doesn't make him right or innocent.
Job is trying to justify himself through excessive and ultimately empty talk.
Context and Significance:
This verse is important because it reveals the core of the debate between Job and his friends. Job maintains his innocence despite his suffering, while his friends believe that his suffering must be a result of some hidden sin. Zophar's words highlight the friends' belief that they have a better understanding of divine justice and that Job is being arrogant in questioning God's ways. They equate eloquence with guilt, assuming that Job's defense is a sign of his refusal to repent. They are essentially saying, "If you were truly innocent, you wouldn't need to say so much to prove it."
It's also worth noting that the book of Job ultimately critiques this viewpoint. While Job's friends are presented as wise and pious individuals, their rigid adherence to a simple cause-and-effect view of suffering is ultimately shown to be inadequate. God eventually rebukes the friends, implying that Job's perspective, though questioning, was closer to the truth.
Job 11:2 - “Shouldn’t the multitude of words be answered? Should a man full of talk be justified?
What does "Job 11:2" mean?
Job 11:2 is a rebuke from Zophar, one of Job's friends, expressing his frustration with Job's lengthy and, in Zophar's view, arrogant pronouncements. Let's break down the verse:
"Shouldn't the multitude of words be answered?" This is a rhetorical question implying that Job's excessive talking is overwhelming and deserves a direct response. Zophar believes that Job's lengthy arguments need to be challenged because they are, in his opinion, misguided and wrong. He's suggesting that Job's volume of speech doesn't make it valid.
"Should a man full of talk be justified?" This question goes further, questioning whether simply speaking a lot should automatically lead to someone being considered right or blameless. Zophar is arguing that Job's abundant words don't equate to righteousness or justification. He believes that Job's verbosity is a smokescreen for his actual sins, which Zophar assumes are the cause of Job's suffering.
In essence, Zophar is saying:
Job is talking too much.
His words are overwhelming and demand a rebuttal.
Speaking a lot doesn't make him right or innocent.
Job is trying to justify himself through excessive and ultimately empty talk.
Context and Significance:
This verse is important because it reveals the core of the debate between Job and his friends. Job maintains his innocence despite his suffering, while his friends believe that his suffering must be a result of some hidden sin. Zophar's words highlight the friends' belief that they have a better understanding of divine justice and that Job is being arrogant in questioning God's ways. They equate eloquence with guilt, assuming that Job's defense is a sign of his refusal to repent. They are essentially saying, "If you were truly innocent, you wouldn't need to say so much to prove it."
It's also worth noting that the book of Job ultimately critiques this viewpoint. While Job's friends are presented as wise and pious individuals, their rigid adherence to a simple cause-and-effect view of suffering is ultimately shown to be inadequate. God eventually rebukes the friends, implying that Job's perspective, though questioning, was closer to the truth.