Genesis 6:4 - The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when God’s sons came in to men’s daughters and had children with them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Genesis 6:4" mean?
Genesis 6:4 is one of the most debated and enigmatic verses in the Bible. There's no single, universally accepted interpretation, but here's a breakdown of the key elements and the major interpretations:
Key Elements of the Verse:
"The Nephilim were in the earth in those days...": This establishes that the Nephilim already existed before the events that follow. The word "Nephilim" (נְפִלִים) is of uncertain origin, but it is often associated with the verb "naphal" (נָפַל) which means "to fall." It is sometimes translated as "giants," "fallen ones," or "tyrants." Their presence suggests a world already corrupted and violent.
"...and also after that...": This indicates that the interactions described below continued to produce Nephilim after some initial event. This is crucial because it complicates interpretations that see the event as a one-time occurrence.
"...when God’s sons came in to men’s daughters and had children with them...": This is the most controversial part. Who are "God's sons," and who are "men's daughters"? This interaction is what resulted in the Nephilim.
"Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.": These children were powerful and famous figures from ancient history. They were known for their strength, skill, and perhaps their deeds, good or bad.
Major Interpretations:
Here are the main ways scholars and theologians have interpreted this verse:
1. The "Divine-Human Intermarriage" Theory (Angelic Interpretation):
"God's sons": Fallen angels or celestial beings who rebelled against God and cohabited with human women.
"Men's daughters": Ordinary human women.
Result: The offspring were the Nephilim – hybrid beings of immense size and strength, a corruption of God's creation.
Support: This interpretation aligns with other ancient Near Eastern myths where gods and humans intermarry. It also resonates with certain passages in the Old Testament (like Job 1:6, Job 2:1, Psalm 82) that refer to "sons of God" as heavenly beings. Some also point to Jude 6-7 and 2 Peter 2:4-5 as supporting this view, where angels are punished for their sin.
Challenges: This interpretation raises theological difficulties about angels being able to procreate physically with humans. It also relies on a specific understanding of "sons of God" that isn't always consistent throughout the Old Testament. Jesus' teaching in Matthew 22:30 that angels do not marry is also often cited as a counterargument.
2. The "Sethite" Interpretation (Human Lineage):
"God's sons": Descendants of Seth, the righteous son of Adam, representing the line of those who called on the name of the Lord (Genesis 4:26). They are seen as being initially faithful to God.
"Men's daughters": Descendants of Cain, representing the ungodly line.
Result: The mixing of the godly and ungodly lines led to moral corruption and the birth of powerful but wicked individuals (the Nephilim). Their wickedness brought God's judgment.
Support: This interpretation keeps the focus on human sin and its consequences. It avoids the theological problems of angelic intermarriage. It also fits the broader narrative of Genesis, which emphasizes the importance of maintaining a righteous lineage.
Challenges: This interpretation has to explain why the intermarriage of two human groups would produce beings of extraordinary size and power. It also requires a somewhat strained reading of "sons of God" as simply meaning "righteous humans."
3. The "Royal/Powerful Men" Interpretation:
"God's sons": Powerful rulers or kings (possibly tyrannical). The phrase "sons of God" can sometimes refer to people in positions of authority or power (consider Psalm 82).
"Men's daughters": Ordinary women.
Result: These powerful men took wives and concubines by force, producing offspring known for their strength and notoriety. The Nephilim were essentially the result of abuse of power and polygamy.
Support: This interpretation aligns with the social context of the ancient Near East, where rulers often had multiple wives and children. It also emphasizes the theme of human violence and oppression.
Challenges: It doesn't fully explain the unique designation of "Nephilim" or why these offspring were described as "mighty men...of renown." It also needs to explain why this practice specifically led to the extreme corruption that prompted the Flood.
Common Ground & Significance:
Despite the differences, these interpretations share some common ground:
Corruption: They all see the events described in Genesis 6:4 as contributing to the overall moral corruption and violence that plagued the pre-Flood world.
Divine Judgment: They all connect these events to God's decision to send the Flood as a judgment on human wickedness.
Theological Importance: Genesis 6:4 serves as a reminder of the consequences of sin and the importance of remaining faithful to God. It also highlights the tension between the divine and the human, and the dangers of blurring the lines between them.
In conclusion:
The meaning of Genesis 6:4 remains a subject of ongoing debate. There is not a clear consensus. Ultimately, the interpretation you choose will likely depend on your broader theological framework and your understanding of the genre and purpose of the Genesis narrative. It is important to approach this verse with humility and a willingness to consider different perspectives.
Genesis 6:4 - The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when God’s sons came in to men’s daughters and had children with them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
What does "Genesis 6:4" mean?
Genesis 6:4 is one of the most debated and enigmatic verses in the Bible. There's no single, universally accepted interpretation, but here's a breakdown of the key elements and the major interpretations:
Key Elements of the Verse:
"The Nephilim were in the earth in those days...": This establishes that the Nephilim already existed before the events that follow. The word "Nephilim" (נְפִלִים) is of uncertain origin, but it is often associated with the verb "naphal" (נָפַל) which means "to fall." It is sometimes translated as "giants," "fallen ones," or "tyrants." Their presence suggests a world already corrupted and violent.
"...and also after that...": This indicates that the interactions described below continued to produce Nephilim after some initial event. This is crucial because it complicates interpretations that see the event as a one-time occurrence.
"...when God’s sons came in to men’s daughters and had children with them...": This is the most controversial part. Who are "God's sons," and who are "men's daughters"? This interaction is what resulted in the Nephilim.
"Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.": These children were powerful and famous figures from ancient history. They were known for their strength, skill, and perhaps their deeds, good or bad.
Major Interpretations:
Here are the main ways scholars and theologians have interpreted this verse:
1. The "Divine-Human Intermarriage" Theory (Angelic Interpretation):
"God's sons": Fallen angels or celestial beings who rebelled against God and cohabited with human women.
"Men's daughters": Ordinary human women.
Result: The offspring were the Nephilim – hybrid beings of immense size and strength, a corruption of God's creation.
Support: This interpretation aligns with other ancient Near Eastern myths where gods and humans intermarry. It also resonates with certain passages in the Old Testament (like Job 1:6, Job 2:1, Psalm 82) that refer to "sons of God" as heavenly beings. Some also point to Jude 6-7 and 2 Peter 2:4-5 as supporting this view, where angels are punished for their sin.
Challenges: This interpretation raises theological difficulties about angels being able to procreate physically with humans. It also relies on a specific understanding of "sons of God" that isn't always consistent throughout the Old Testament. Jesus' teaching in Matthew 22:30 that angels do not marry is also often cited as a counterargument.
2. The "Sethite" Interpretation (Human Lineage):
"God's sons": Descendants of Seth, the righteous son of Adam, representing the line of those who called on the name of the Lord (Genesis 4:26). They are seen as being initially faithful to God.
"Men's daughters": Descendants of Cain, representing the ungodly line.
Result: The mixing of the godly and ungodly lines led to moral corruption and the birth of powerful but wicked individuals (the Nephilim). Their wickedness brought God's judgment.
Support: This interpretation keeps the focus on human sin and its consequences. It avoids the theological problems of angelic intermarriage. It also fits the broader narrative of Genesis, which emphasizes the importance of maintaining a righteous lineage.
Challenges: This interpretation has to explain why the intermarriage of two human groups would produce beings of extraordinary size and power. It also requires a somewhat strained reading of "sons of God" as simply meaning "righteous humans."
3. The "Royal/Powerful Men" Interpretation:
"God's sons": Powerful rulers or kings (possibly tyrannical). The phrase "sons of God" can sometimes refer to people in positions of authority or power (consider Psalm 82).
"Men's daughters": Ordinary women.
Result: These powerful men took wives and concubines by force, producing offspring known for their strength and notoriety. The Nephilim were essentially the result of abuse of power and polygamy.
Support: This interpretation aligns with the social context of the ancient Near East, where rulers often had multiple wives and children. It also emphasizes the theme of human violence and oppression.
Challenges: It doesn't fully explain the unique designation of "Nephilim" or why these offspring were described as "mighty men...of renown." It also needs to explain why this practice specifically led to the extreme corruption that prompted the Flood.
Common Ground & Significance:
Despite the differences, these interpretations share some common ground:
Corruption: They all see the events described in Genesis 6:4 as contributing to the overall moral corruption and violence that plagued the pre-Flood world.
Divine Judgment: They all connect these events to God's decision to send the Flood as a judgment on human wickedness.
Theological Importance: Genesis 6:4 serves as a reminder of the consequences of sin and the importance of remaining faithful to God. It also highlights the tension between the divine and the human, and the dangers of blurring the lines between them.
In conclusion:
The meaning of Genesis 6:4 remains a subject of ongoing debate. There is not a clear consensus. Ultimately, the interpretation you choose will likely depend on your broader theological framework and your understanding of the genre and purpose of the Genesis narrative. It is important to approach this verse with humility and a willingness to consider different perspectives.