Genesis 6:2 - God’s sons saw that men’s daughters were beautiful, and they took any that they wanted for themselves as wives.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Genesis 6:2" mean?
Genesis 6:2, "God's sons saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they took any of them they wanted as wives," is one of the most debated and interpreted verses in the Bible. There is no single, universally accepted understanding. The core of the debate revolves around identifying who "God's sons" were. Here are the main interpretations:
The "Divine Beings" Interpretation (or the "Fallen Angels" Interpretation): This view identifies "God's sons" as supernatural beings, specifically fallen angels. It suggests that these angels lusted after human women, mated with them, and produced offspring of extraordinary size and power (the Nephilim, mentioned later in the chapter).
Arguments for: This interpretation aligns with other ancient Near Eastern mythology where deities or semi-divine beings interact with humans. The Old Testament sometimes uses "sons of God" (Hebrew: bene elohim) to refer to heavenly beings (e.g., Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7). Some early Jewish and Christian writers (like the authors of the Book of Enoch) embraced this view. It explains the Nephilim's strength as a result of divine-human unions.
Arguments against: The idea of angels having physical relations with humans is problematic and often considered inconsistent with orthodox theology. Some question whether angels are capable of physical reproduction.
The "Royal Lineage" Interpretation: This view interprets "God's sons" as descendants of Seth (Adam's son), who were righteous and followed God. They married women from the line of Cain, who were ungodly. This intermarriage led to widespread wickedness.
Arguments for: This interpretation avoids the theological problems associated with the fallen angel view. It sees the problem as a mixing of the righteous and the unrighteous, corrupting the line of Seth. Some understand the term "sons of God" to refer to those who follow and worship God.
Arguments against: It's not clear why the descendants of Seth are referred to as "sons of God" in this particular passage. The term "sons of God" seems a high title for ordinary descendants. It doesn't fully explain the existence of the Nephilim.
The "Powerful Rulers" Interpretation: This view identifies "God's sons" as powerful men, perhaps rulers or chieftains, who took women as they pleased, likely as concubines or wives in a polygamous manner.
Arguments for: The term "sons of God" can be used to describe those in positions of power or authority (Psalm 82:6). This interpretation aligns with the social dynamics of ancient societies where powerful men often had multiple wives or concubines.
Arguments against: This interpretation doesn't adequately explain the unusual nature of the offspring, the Nephilim.
Key Points to Consider:
Context: The passage immediately precedes the story of the Great Flood, which God sends to wipe out the wickedness that has overtaken the earth. This context suggests that the events of Genesis 6:1-4 are a significant part of the reason for God's judgment.
Nephilim: The offspring of these unions are referred to as the Nephilim, who were "heroes of old, men of renown." The origin and nature of the Nephilim are also subject to much debate.
Purpose of the Passage: Regardless of the specific interpretation, the overall purpose of the passage seems to be to emphasize the increasing wickedness and corruption of humanity, which leads to God's decision to send the Flood.
In Summary:
The meaning of Genesis 6:2 is complex and subject to different interpretations. The key question is the identity of "God's sons." The three main interpretations are: 1) fallen angels, 2) the righteous line of Seth, and 3) powerful rulers. Each interpretation has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which to adopt often depends on one's theological framework and understanding of the Old Testament. Regardless of the chosen interpretation, the passage ultimately highlights the pervasive wickedness that led to the Flood.
Genesis 6:2 - God’s sons saw that men’s daughters were beautiful, and they took any that they wanted for themselves as wives.
What does "Genesis 6:2" mean?
Genesis 6:2, "God's sons saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they took any of them they wanted as wives," is one of the most debated and interpreted verses in the Bible. There is no single, universally accepted understanding. The core of the debate revolves around identifying who "God's sons" were. Here are the main interpretations:
The "Divine Beings" Interpretation (or the "Fallen Angels" Interpretation): This view identifies "God's sons" as supernatural beings, specifically fallen angels. It suggests that these angels lusted after human women, mated with them, and produced offspring of extraordinary size and power (the Nephilim, mentioned later in the chapter).
Arguments for: This interpretation aligns with other ancient Near Eastern mythology where deities or semi-divine beings interact with humans. The Old Testament sometimes uses "sons of God" (Hebrew: bene elohim) to refer to heavenly beings (e.g., Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7). Some early Jewish and Christian writers (like the authors of the Book of Enoch) embraced this view. It explains the Nephilim's strength as a result of divine-human unions.
Arguments against: The idea of angels having physical relations with humans is problematic and often considered inconsistent with orthodox theology. Some question whether angels are capable of physical reproduction.
The "Royal Lineage" Interpretation: This view interprets "God's sons" as descendants of Seth (Adam's son), who were righteous and followed God. They married women from the line of Cain, who were ungodly. This intermarriage led to widespread wickedness.
Arguments for: This interpretation avoids the theological problems associated with the fallen angel view. It sees the problem as a mixing of the righteous and the unrighteous, corrupting the line of Seth. Some understand the term "sons of God" to refer to those who follow and worship God.
Arguments against: It's not clear why the descendants of Seth are referred to as "sons of God" in this particular passage. The term "sons of God" seems a high title for ordinary descendants. It doesn't fully explain the existence of the Nephilim.
The "Powerful Rulers" Interpretation: This view identifies "God's sons" as powerful men, perhaps rulers or chieftains, who took women as they pleased, likely as concubines or wives in a polygamous manner.
Arguments for: The term "sons of God" can be used to describe those in positions of power or authority (Psalm 82:6). This interpretation aligns with the social dynamics of ancient societies where powerful men often had multiple wives or concubines.
Arguments against: This interpretation doesn't adequately explain the unusual nature of the offspring, the Nephilim.
Key Points to Consider:
Context: The passage immediately precedes the story of the Great Flood, which God sends to wipe out the wickedness that has overtaken the earth. This context suggests that the events of Genesis 6:1-4 are a significant part of the reason for God's judgment.
Nephilim: The offspring of these unions are referred to as the Nephilim, who were "heroes of old, men of renown." The origin and nature of the Nephilim are also subject to much debate.
Purpose of the Passage: Regardless of the specific interpretation, the overall purpose of the passage seems to be to emphasize the increasing wickedness and corruption of humanity, which leads to God's decision to send the Flood.
In Summary:
The meaning of Genesis 6:2 is complex and subject to different interpretations. The key question is the identity of "God's sons." The three main interpretations are: 1) fallen angels, 2) the righteous line of Seth, and 3) powerful rulers. Each interpretation has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which to adopt often depends on one's theological framework and understanding of the Old Testament. Regardless of the chosen interpretation, the passage ultimately highlights the pervasive wickedness that led to the Flood.