Genesis 34:21 - “These men are peaceful with us. Therefore let them live in the land and trade in it. For behold, the land is large enough for them. Let us take their daughters to us for wives, and let us give them our daughters.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Genesis 34:21" mean?
This verse, Genesis 34:21, is spoken by Hamor, the father of Shechem, in the context of the story of Dinah's rape by Shechem. It's a proposition to the men of Shechem to integrate with Jacob and his sons after the incident. Let's break down the meaning:
"These men are peaceful with us." Hamor is trying to portray Jacob and his sons as non-threatening. This is likely a manipulative statement, designed to downplay the tension and anger that surely existed after Dinah's violation. It's a way to present integration as a desirable and easy option.
"Therefore let them live in the land and trade in it." This is the core of the offer. Hamor proposes allowing Jacob and his sons to settle permanently in their territory and to engage in commerce. This suggests potential economic benefits for the men of Shechem, as well as increased political power in the region.
"For behold, the land is large enough for them." This is a justification for allowing the newcomers to settle. Hamor claims there's ample room for both groups to coexist without conflict over resources.
"Let us take their daughters to us for wives, and let us give them our daughters." This is a proposal for intermarriage. Hamor believes that intermarriage would create stronger bonds between the two groups and further solidify their integration. In ancient cultures, marriage was often used to create alliances and prevent conflicts.
Underlying Meanings and Implications:
Manipulation: Hamor's words are probably driven by self-interest and a desire to retain control. He likely seeks to appease Jacob and his sons to prevent them from seeking revenge for Dinah's rape.
Economic and Political Gain: Integration would allow the men of Shechem to benefit economically from the skills and resources of Jacob and his family.
Assimilation: The proposal of intermarriage also suggests a desire to assimilate Jacob's family into the local culture and religion, potentially weakening their unique identity.
Irony and Foreshadowing: The verse is ironic because, in the subsequent verses, Jacob's sons, driven by Simeon and Levi, use this offer of intermarriage as a deceptive ploy. They agree to Hamor's conditions, but only if the men of Shechem are circumcised. After the men of Shechem are circumcised and in pain, Simeon and Levi kill all the men in the city and plunder it. Thus, the peaceful coexistence suggested in the verse is a facade that leads to violence and betrayal.
Moral Implications: The verse raises ethical questions about intermarriage, cultural assimilation, and the use of deception and violence.
In essence, Genesis 34:21 represents a calculated attempt by Hamor to integrate with Jacob's family, likely driven by political and economic motives. However, this seemingly reasonable proposal masks deeper tensions and ultimately serves as a catalyst for a tragic act of revenge.
Genesis 34:21 - “These men are peaceful with us. Therefore let them live in the land and trade in it. For behold, the land is large enough for them. Let us take their daughters to us for wives, and let us give them our daughters.
What does "Genesis 34:21" mean?
This verse, Genesis 34:21, is spoken by Hamor, the father of Shechem, in the context of the story of Dinah's rape by Shechem. It's a proposition to the men of Shechem to integrate with Jacob and his sons after the incident. Let's break down the meaning:
"These men are peaceful with us." Hamor is trying to portray Jacob and his sons as non-threatening. This is likely a manipulative statement, designed to downplay the tension and anger that surely existed after Dinah's violation. It's a way to present integration as a desirable and easy option.
"Therefore let them live in the land and trade in it." This is the core of the offer. Hamor proposes allowing Jacob and his sons to settle permanently in their territory and to engage in commerce. This suggests potential economic benefits for the men of Shechem, as well as increased political power in the region.
"For behold, the land is large enough for them." This is a justification for allowing the newcomers to settle. Hamor claims there's ample room for both groups to coexist without conflict over resources.
"Let us take their daughters to us for wives, and let us give them our daughters." This is a proposal for intermarriage. Hamor believes that intermarriage would create stronger bonds between the two groups and further solidify their integration. In ancient cultures, marriage was often used to create alliances and prevent conflicts.
Underlying Meanings and Implications:
Manipulation: Hamor's words are probably driven by self-interest and a desire to retain control. He likely seeks to appease Jacob and his sons to prevent them from seeking revenge for Dinah's rape.
Economic and Political Gain: Integration would allow the men of Shechem to benefit economically from the skills and resources of Jacob and his family.
Assimilation: The proposal of intermarriage also suggests a desire to assimilate Jacob's family into the local culture and religion, potentially weakening their unique identity.
Irony and Foreshadowing: The verse is ironic because, in the subsequent verses, Jacob's sons, driven by Simeon and Levi, use this offer of intermarriage as a deceptive ploy. They agree to Hamor's conditions, but only if the men of Shechem are circumcised. After the men of Shechem are circumcised and in pain, Simeon and Levi kill all the men in the city and plunder it. Thus, the peaceful coexistence suggested in the verse is a facade that leads to violence and betrayal.
Moral Implications: The verse raises ethical questions about intermarriage, cultural assimilation, and the use of deception and violence.
In essence, Genesis 34:21 represents a calculated attempt by Hamor to integrate with Jacob's family, likely driven by political and economic motives. However, this seemingly reasonable proposal masks deeper tensions and ultimately serves as a catalyst for a tragic act of revenge.