Ezra 2:66 - Their horses were seven hundred thirty-six; their mules, two hundred forty-five;
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Ezra 2:66" mean?
This verse, Ezra 2:66, is part of a census list describing the livestock that the Jewish exiles brought back to Jerusalem from Babylon.
Their horses were seven hundred thirty-six: This simply means the group brought back 736 horses. Horses would have been valuable for transportation, agriculture, and potentially military purposes.
Their mules, two hundred forty-five: This means the group brought back 245 mules. Mules, being a hybrid of a donkey and a horse, are known for their strength, endurance, and hardiness. They would have been particularly useful for carrying heavy loads and working in the fields.
In summary, the verse provides a count of two types of livestock that were significant assets for the returning exiles as they rebuilt their lives and society in Jerusalem. These animals would have contributed to their ability to farm, transport goods, and re-establish themselves in the land. It highlights the practical resources the returnees possessed, indicating some level of economic capacity within the returning community.
Ezra 2:66 - Their horses were seven hundred thirty-six; their mules, two hundred forty-five;
What does "Ezra 2:66" mean?
This verse, Ezra 2:66, is part of a census list describing the livestock that the Jewish exiles brought back to Jerusalem from Babylon.
Their horses were seven hundred thirty-six: This simply means the group brought back 736 horses. Horses would have been valuable for transportation, agriculture, and potentially military purposes.
Their mules, two hundred forty-five: This means the group brought back 245 mules. Mules, being a hybrid of a donkey and a horse, are known for their strength, endurance, and hardiness. They would have been particularly useful for carrying heavy loads and working in the fields.
In summary, the verse provides a count of two types of livestock that were significant assets for the returning exiles as they rebuilt their lives and society in Jerusalem. These animals would have contributed to their ability to farm, transport goods, and re-establish themselves in the land. It highlights the practical resources the returnees possessed, indicating some level of economic capacity within the returning community.