Exodus 21:23 - But if any harm follows, then you must take life for life,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Exodus 21:23" mean?
Exodus 21:23 ("But if any harm follows, then you must take life for life") is a key verse discussing the principle of lex talionis, often translated as "an eye for an eye." Let's break down what it means in its context:
Context is crucial: This verse is part of a larger section (Exodus 21:18-36) dealing with laws of compensation for injuries caused by negligence or intentional actions. It specifically addresses a scenario where two men are fighting and accidentally injure a pregnant woman, causing her to miscarry or be otherwise harmed.
"Harm follows" (Ason): The Hebrew word translated as "harm" or "injury" is ason. It broadly encompasses any kind of damage or injury. In the specific scenario addressed in the preceding verses, it refers to the potential harm to the woman or her baby as a result of the accidental injury.
"Life for life" (Nefesh Tachat Nefesh): This is the core of the lex talionis. Nefesh means "soul" or "life." The phrase suggests that if the injury results in the death of the woman or the baby, the appropriate penalty is the taking of the life of the one who caused the harm (likely not necessarily the primary aggressor, but whoever dealt the fatal blow or was deemed responsible for the death through negligence).
Interpretations and Implications:
Principle of Proportionality: The "life for life" principle, and the broader lex talionis, is generally understood as establishing a principle of proportionality in justice. The punishment should be equivalent to the crime. It serves as a limitation to prevent excessive retribution.
Not Necessarily Literal Retribution: While the verse uses the language of "eye for eye," "tooth for tooth," it's important to note that many Jewish legal scholars throughout history have interpreted these phrases as requiring monetary compensation rather than literal bodily harm. This is based on the difficulty and potential barbarity of implementing such literal punishments, as well as other scriptural passages and rabbinic interpretations. The goal was fair compensation for the injured party and to deter future wrongdoing.
Deterrence: One of the purposes of this law was to deter violence and negligence. By making people responsible for the consequences of their actions, it aimed to create a society where individuals were more careful and considerate of others.
Limitation of Vengeance: Another interpretation suggests that this law was a limit on personal vengeance. Instead of a family escalating a feud with ever-increasing acts of violence, the law provided a framework for a more controlled and proportional response to injury.
Different Interpretations:
Literal Interpretation: Some interpret the verse as demanding literal retribution. However, this interpretation is less common in modern legal systems and faces practical and ethical challenges.
Symbolic Interpretation: The "eye for eye" principle is often seen as a symbolic representation of the value of human life and the importance of justice.
In Summary:
Exodus 21:23 expresses the principle that harm should be met with equivalent compensation, with the most severe consequence being "life for life" if death results from the injury. This verse reflects the ancient concept of lex talionis (the law of retaliation), aiming to ensure proportional justice, deter crime, and limit excessive vengeance. The interpretation and application of this principle have varied throughout history, with many Jewish legal scholars advocating for monetary compensation as a practical and ethical alternative to literal retribution.
Exodus 21:23 - But if any harm follows, then you must take life for life,
What does "Exodus 21:23" mean?
Exodus 21:23 ("But if any harm follows, then you must take life for life") is a key verse discussing the principle of lex talionis, often translated as "an eye for an eye." Let's break down what it means in its context:
Context is crucial: This verse is part of a larger section (Exodus 21:18-36) dealing with laws of compensation for injuries caused by negligence or intentional actions. It specifically addresses a scenario where two men are fighting and accidentally injure a pregnant woman, causing her to miscarry or be otherwise harmed.
"Harm follows" (Ason): The Hebrew word translated as "harm" or "injury" is ason. It broadly encompasses any kind of damage or injury. In the specific scenario addressed in the preceding verses, it refers to the potential harm to the woman or her baby as a result of the accidental injury.
"Life for life" (Nefesh Tachat Nefesh): This is the core of the lex talionis. Nefesh means "soul" or "life." The phrase suggests that if the injury results in the death of the woman or the baby, the appropriate penalty is the taking of the life of the one who caused the harm (likely not necessarily the primary aggressor, but whoever dealt the fatal blow or was deemed responsible for the death through negligence).
Interpretations and Implications:
Principle of Proportionality: The "life for life" principle, and the broader lex talionis, is generally understood as establishing a principle of proportionality in justice. The punishment should be equivalent to the crime. It serves as a limitation to prevent excessive retribution.
Not Necessarily Literal Retribution: While the verse uses the language of "eye for eye," "tooth for tooth," it's important to note that many Jewish legal scholars throughout history have interpreted these phrases as requiring monetary compensation rather than literal bodily harm. This is based on the difficulty and potential barbarity of implementing such literal punishments, as well as other scriptural passages and rabbinic interpretations. The goal was fair compensation for the injured party and to deter future wrongdoing.
Deterrence: One of the purposes of this law was to deter violence and negligence. By making people responsible for the consequences of their actions, it aimed to create a society where individuals were more careful and considerate of others.
Limitation of Vengeance: Another interpretation suggests that this law was a limit on personal vengeance. Instead of a family escalating a feud with ever-increasing acts of violence, the law provided a framework for a more controlled and proportional response to injury.
Different Interpretations:
Literal Interpretation: Some interpret the verse as demanding literal retribution. However, this interpretation is less common in modern legal systems and faces practical and ethical challenges.
Symbolic Interpretation: The "eye for eye" principle is often seen as a symbolic representation of the value of human life and the importance of justice.
In Summary:
Exodus 21:23 expresses the principle that harm should be met with equivalent compensation, with the most severe consequence being "life for life" if death results from the injury. This verse reflects the ancient concept of lex talionis (the law of retaliation), aiming to ensure proportional justice, deter crime, and limit excessive vengeance. The interpretation and application of this principle have varied throughout history, with many Jewish legal scholars advocating for monetary compensation as a practical and ethical alternative to literal retribution.