Exodus 12:44 - but every man’s servant who is bought for money, when you have circumcised him, then shall he eat of it.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Exodus 12:44" mean?
Exodus 12:44 refers to the regulations surrounding the Passover sacrifice in ancient Israel. To understand this verse, it's helpful to consider the context:
Passover: This was a significant religious festival commemorating the Israelites' deliverance from slavery in Egypt. A key part of the observance was the sacrificial lamb, which was eaten.
Who could partake: The regulations specified who was eligible to eat the Passover lamb. Generally, it was for the Israelite community.
Foreigners and servants: This verse addresses the situation of servants who were "bought for money" – i.e., slaves. The key point is that such a servant was only eligible to eat the Passover meal after being circumcised.
Therefore, Exodus 12:44 means:
A male slave who was purchased (i.e., not a native-born Israelite) was allowed to partake in the Passover meal if and only if he underwent circumcision. Circumcision was a sign of the covenant between God and Abraham and his descendants. By being circumcised, the slave was essentially being integrated into the covenant community and could then participate in the Passover.
Implications:
Religious Integration: The verse suggests a path for non-Israelites to be included in the religious life of the community, although it was connected to the institution of slavery.
Circumcision as a prerequisite: It highlights the importance of circumcision as a sign of belonging to the covenant community.
Inclusion based on Commitment: The slave had to be circumcised, showing that he was committed to following the tenants of God.
Social Dynamics: It reflects the social structure of the time, where slavery was practiced, but also suggests a potential path for enslaved people to be integrated into Israelite society, at least religiously.
It is worth noting that interpretations of these verses and their ethical implications have been discussed and debated throughout history and in various religious traditions.
Exodus 12:44 - but every man’s servant who is bought for money, when you have circumcised him, then shall he eat of it.
What does "Exodus 12:44" mean?
Exodus 12:44 refers to the regulations surrounding the Passover sacrifice in ancient Israel. To understand this verse, it's helpful to consider the context:
Passover: This was a significant religious festival commemorating the Israelites' deliverance from slavery in Egypt. A key part of the observance was the sacrificial lamb, which was eaten.
Who could partake: The regulations specified who was eligible to eat the Passover lamb. Generally, it was for the Israelite community.
Foreigners and servants: This verse addresses the situation of servants who were "bought for money" – i.e., slaves. The key point is that such a servant was only eligible to eat the Passover meal after being circumcised.
Therefore, Exodus 12:44 means:
A male slave who was purchased (i.e., not a native-born Israelite) was allowed to partake in the Passover meal if and only if he underwent circumcision. Circumcision was a sign of the covenant between God and Abraham and his descendants. By being circumcised, the slave was essentially being integrated into the covenant community and could then participate in the Passover.
Implications:
Religious Integration: The verse suggests a path for non-Israelites to be included in the religious life of the community, although it was connected to the institution of slavery.
Circumcision as a prerequisite: It highlights the importance of circumcision as a sign of belonging to the covenant community.
Inclusion based on Commitment: The slave had to be circumcised, showing that he was committed to following the tenants of God.
Social Dynamics: It reflects the social structure of the time, where slavery was practiced, but also suggests a potential path for enslaved people to be integrated into Israelite society, at least religiously.
It is worth noting that interpretations of these verses and their ethical implications have been discussed and debated throughout history and in various religious traditions.