Esther 7:8 - Then the king returned out of the palace garden into the place of the banquet of wine; and Haman had fallen on the couch where Esther was. Then the king said, “Will he even assault the queen in front of me in the house?” As the word went out of the king’s mouth, they covered Haman’s face.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Esther 7:8" mean?
This verse from Esther 7:8 is the climax of the story where Haman's treachery and ultimate downfall are revealed. Let's break it down:
"Then the king returned out of the palace garden into the place of the banquet of wine..." The king (Ahasuerus/Xerxes) had momentarily left the banquet, likely to ponder what Esther had just revealed - that she was a Jew and that someone was plotting to kill her and her people. His mind was troubled and he needed air.
"...and Haman had fallen on the couch where Esther was." While the king was gone, Haman, realizing the gravity of the situation and the perilous position he was in, desperately pleaded for his life from Esther. In his terror and supplication, he had thrown himself onto the couch where Esther was reclining, begging for mercy. This action, while intended to be a plea, looked incredibly inappropriate and even threatening in the context of the time and culture.
"Then the king said, “Will he even assault the queen in front of me in the house?”" The king's return was perfectly timed (or mistimed, depending on your perspective) for Haman. Seeing Haman sprawled on Esther's couch, the king, already suspicious and agitated, interprets the situation in the worst possible light. He jumps to the conclusion that Haman is attempting to assault or violate the queen right there in his presence, in his own palace. The king's anger is fueled by the violation of royal hospitality and the implicit threat to his power and honor.
"As the word went out of the king’s mouth, they covered Haman’s face." This is a critical detail. Covering the face was a sign of condemnation and impending execution in that culture. Once the king accused Haman, his fate was sealed. Covering his face was the signal that he was to be taken away to be executed. There was no trial, no further questioning. The king's word was law.
In Summary:
The verse depicts Haman's desperate attempt to save himself backfiring spectacularly. His actions, driven by panic, are misinterpreted by the king as a brazen act of aggression against the queen. This misinterpretation, fueled by the king's prior suspicions, seals Haman's doom. The verse highlights:
Haman's desperate and foolish actions: He goes from being the king's favorite to a desperate supplicant.
The king's impulsiveness and volatile temper: He jumps to conclusions without investigating further.
The swiftness and finality of the king's justice: Once accused, Haman is condemned and prepared for execution instantly.
The importance of appearances: Haman's actions, regardless of his intent, appeared highly inappropriate and contributed to his downfall.
Divine Providence: From a religious perspective, one could argue that God orchestrated these events, making sure that Haman's own actions were his undoing.
Esther 7:8 - Then the king returned out of the palace garden into the place of the banquet of wine; and Haman had fallen on the couch where Esther was. Then the king said, “Will he even assault the queen in front of me in the house?” As the word went out of the king’s mouth, they covered Haman’s face.
What does "Esther 7:8" mean?
This verse from Esther 7:8 is the climax of the story where Haman's treachery and ultimate downfall are revealed. Let's break it down:
"Then the king returned out of the palace garden into the place of the banquet of wine..." The king (Ahasuerus/Xerxes) had momentarily left the banquet, likely to ponder what Esther had just revealed - that she was a Jew and that someone was plotting to kill her and her people. His mind was troubled and he needed air.
"...and Haman had fallen on the couch where Esther was." While the king was gone, Haman, realizing the gravity of the situation and the perilous position he was in, desperately pleaded for his life from Esther. In his terror and supplication, he had thrown himself onto the couch where Esther was reclining, begging for mercy. This action, while intended to be a plea, looked incredibly inappropriate and even threatening in the context of the time and culture.
"Then the king said, “Will he even assault the queen in front of me in the house?”" The king's return was perfectly timed (or mistimed, depending on your perspective) for Haman. Seeing Haman sprawled on Esther's couch, the king, already suspicious and agitated, interprets the situation in the worst possible light. He jumps to the conclusion that Haman is attempting to assault or violate the queen right there in his presence, in his own palace. The king's anger is fueled by the violation of royal hospitality and the implicit threat to his power and honor.
"As the word went out of the king’s mouth, they covered Haman’s face." This is a critical detail. Covering the face was a sign of condemnation and impending execution in that culture. Once the king accused Haman, his fate was sealed. Covering his face was the signal that he was to be taken away to be executed. There was no trial, no further questioning. The king's word was law.
In Summary:
The verse depicts Haman's desperate attempt to save himself backfiring spectacularly. His actions, driven by panic, are misinterpreted by the king as a brazen act of aggression against the queen. This misinterpretation, fueled by the king's prior suspicions, seals Haman's doom. The verse highlights:
Haman's desperate and foolish actions: He goes from being the king's favorite to a desperate supplicant.
The king's impulsiveness and volatile temper: He jumps to conclusions without investigating further.
The swiftness and finality of the king's justice: Once accused, Haman is condemned and prepared for execution instantly.
The importance of appearances: Haman's actions, regardless of his intent, appeared highly inappropriate and contributed to his downfall.
Divine Providence: From a religious perspective, one could argue that God orchestrated these events, making sure that Haman's own actions were his undoing.