Deuteronomy 25:6 - It shall be that the firstborn whom she bears shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead, that his name not be blotted out of Israel.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Deuteronomy 25:6" mean?
Deuteronomy 25:6 addresses the practice of levirate marriage. Let's break down what it means:
"It shall be that the firstborn whom she bears": This refers to the first son born from the union we're about to describe.
"shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead": The key here is the death of a married man without children. This law dictates that his brother (typically the next closest brother in age) is obligated to marry the widow. The firstborn son from that union is considered the legal heir to the deceased brother. He inherits the deceased brother's name, property, and lineage rights. He's essentially legally considered the son of the deceased brother for inheritance purposes.
"that his name not be blotted out of Israel": This is the fundamental reason behind levirate marriage. In ancient Israelite society, having sons was crucial. It ensured the continuation of the family line, the inheritance of land, and the maintenance of the family's position within the tribal structure. If a man died without a son, his name was essentially in danger of being "blotted out"—forgotten, with his line extinguished. Levirate marriage provided a mechanism to prevent this erasure.
In simpler terms:
If a married man dies without having a son, his brother is obligated to marry the widow. The first son born from this new marriage is legally considered the son of the deceased brother. This ensures that the deceased man's name, inheritance, and family line continue in Israel.
Why was this important?
Preservation of Family Lineage: A primary goal was to keep the family line alive and to ensure that the deceased man was not forgotten.
Inheritance: Land and property were tied to specific families. Levirate marriage prevented the loss of these inheritances.
Social Security for the Widow: In a society where women were often economically dependent on men, levirate marriage provided a form of social security for the widow. It ensured she had a male relative to care for her.
Religious Obligation: It was seen as a religious duty to ensure the continuity of the family and the land promised to them.
Important Considerations:
Choice: While the brother was obligated, the law also provided an option for him to refuse (see Deuteronomy 25:5-10). However, this refusal came with social stigma and a symbolic shaming ritual.
Historical Context: It's crucial to understand that this law was specific to the socio-cultural context of ancient Israel. Its application in modern times is a matter of theological debate among different Jewish traditions.
Ethical Implications: Modern interpretations sometimes grapple with the ethical implications of a forced marriage.
Deuteronomy 25:6 - It shall be that the firstborn whom she bears shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead, that his name not be blotted out of Israel.
What does "Deuteronomy 25:6" mean?
Deuteronomy 25:6 addresses the practice of levirate marriage. Let's break down what it means:
"It shall be that the firstborn whom she bears": This refers to the first son born from the union we're about to describe.
"shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead": The key here is the death of a married man without children. This law dictates that his brother (typically the next closest brother in age) is obligated to marry the widow. The firstborn son from that union is considered the legal heir to the deceased brother. He inherits the deceased brother's name, property, and lineage rights. He's essentially legally considered the son of the deceased brother for inheritance purposes.
"that his name not be blotted out of Israel": This is the fundamental reason behind levirate marriage. In ancient Israelite society, having sons was crucial. It ensured the continuation of the family line, the inheritance of land, and the maintenance of the family's position within the tribal structure. If a man died without a son, his name was essentially in danger of being "blotted out"—forgotten, with his line extinguished. Levirate marriage provided a mechanism to prevent this erasure.
In simpler terms:
If a married man dies without having a son, his brother is obligated to marry the widow. The first son born from this new marriage is legally considered the son of the deceased brother. This ensures that the deceased man's name, inheritance, and family line continue in Israel.
Why was this important?
Preservation of Family Lineage: A primary goal was to keep the family line alive and to ensure that the deceased man was not forgotten.
Inheritance: Land and property were tied to specific families. Levirate marriage prevented the loss of these inheritances.
Social Security for the Widow: In a society where women were often economically dependent on men, levirate marriage provided a form of social security for the widow. It ensured she had a male relative to care for her.
Religious Obligation: It was seen as a religious duty to ensure the continuity of the family and the land promised to them.
Important Considerations:
Choice: While the brother was obligated, the law also provided an option for him to refuse (see Deuteronomy 25:5-10). However, this refusal came with social stigma and a symbolic shaming ritual.
Historical Context: It's crucial to understand that this law was specific to the socio-cultural context of ancient Israel. Its application in modern times is a matter of theological debate among different Jewish traditions.
Ethical Implications: Modern interpretations sometimes grapple with the ethical implications of a forced marriage.