Deuteronomy 25:10 - His name shall be called in Israel, “The house of him who had his shoe removed.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Deuteronomy 25:10" mean?
This verse refers to a specific ancient Israelite custom described in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, often called the "Levirate marriage" or "brother's duty marriage." Here's a breakdown of the verse and its context:
The Context (Deuteronomy 25:5-10):
The Situation: If a married man dies without having a son (a male heir), his brother (or closest male relative) had a duty to marry the widow.
Purpose: The purpose of this practice was to continue the dead brother's lineage and keep his family name alive. The first son born to the brother and widow would be considered the legal heir of the deceased brother, inheriting his property and carrying on his name.
Refusal: If the brother refused to fulfill this obligation (i.e., marry the widow), a formal ceremony took place.
The Ceremony (as described in the verses):
1. Public Confrontation: The widow would bring the brother before the elders of the city.
2. Declaration: She would declare that the brother was refusing to perpetuate his brother's name in Israel.
3. Disgraceful Act: The widow would then publicly remove the brother's sandal (shoe) from his foot. In some interpretations, she might also spit in his face (though this is debated).
4. Public Shame: This act symbolized the brother's rejection of his duty and brought shame upon him.
The Meaning of Deuteronomy 25:10:
"His name shall be called in Israel, 'The house of him who had his shoe removed.'"
Shame and Stigma: The key point is that the family of the man who refused his duty would bear a permanent mark of shame and dishonor. They would be known by this demeaning title.
Social Consequences: This verse emphasized the societal pressure to uphold the Levirate marriage custom. Refusing was not just a personal decision; it had social repercussions that affected the man and his entire family.
"The house of him who had his shoe removed": This phrase became a derogatory label or a nickname to identify the family. The act of having the shoe removed became a symbol of dishonor and a constant reminder of the man's failure to fulfill his duty.
Maintaining lineage: By ensuring the brother marries the widow, the practice ensures the lineage of the deceased man continues on through the birth of a male heir.
Significance and Interpretation:
Preservation of Family and Land: In ancient Israelite society, family lineage and the inheritance of land were crucial for social stability and economic survival. The Levirate marriage system was designed to protect these elements.
Care for Widows: Widows in ancient societies were often vulnerable, lacking economic and social support. This practice provided a means of ensuring their well-being and preventing them from becoming destitute.
Cultural Context: It's essential to understand that this custom was specific to ancient Israelite society and should be interpreted within its historical and cultural context.
Moral Dilemma: Some modern scholars and ethicists debate the morality of the Levirate marriage, particularly regarding the potential for coercion or the exploitation of women.
In summary, Deuteronomy 25:10 is a powerful verse that underscores the importance of the Levirate marriage custom in ancient Israel. It highlights the shame and lasting social consequences associated with refusing to fulfill one's duty to perpetuate a deceased brother's lineage. The phrase "The house of him who had his shoe removed" became a derogatory label, a public mark of dishonor for the man and his family.
Deuteronomy 25:10 - His name shall be called in Israel, “The house of him who had his shoe removed.”
What does "Deuteronomy 25:10" mean?
This verse refers to a specific ancient Israelite custom described in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, often called the "Levirate marriage" or "brother's duty marriage." Here's a breakdown of the verse and its context:
The Context (Deuteronomy 25:5-10):
The Situation: If a married man dies without having a son (a male heir), his brother (or closest male relative) had a duty to marry the widow.
Purpose: The purpose of this practice was to continue the dead brother's lineage and keep his family name alive. The first son born to the brother and widow would be considered the legal heir of the deceased brother, inheriting his property and carrying on his name.
Refusal: If the brother refused to fulfill this obligation (i.e., marry the widow), a formal ceremony took place.
The Ceremony (as described in the verses):
1. Public Confrontation: The widow would bring the brother before the elders of the city.
2. Declaration: She would declare that the brother was refusing to perpetuate his brother's name in Israel.
3. Disgraceful Act: The widow would then publicly remove the brother's sandal (shoe) from his foot. In some interpretations, she might also spit in his face (though this is debated).
4. Public Shame: This act symbolized the brother's rejection of his duty and brought shame upon him.
The Meaning of Deuteronomy 25:10:
"His name shall be called in Israel, 'The house of him who had his shoe removed.'"
Shame and Stigma: The key point is that the family of the man who refused his duty would bear a permanent mark of shame and dishonor. They would be known by this demeaning title.
Social Consequences: This verse emphasized the societal pressure to uphold the Levirate marriage custom. Refusing was not just a personal decision; it had social repercussions that affected the man and his entire family.
"The house of him who had his shoe removed": This phrase became a derogatory label or a nickname to identify the family. The act of having the shoe removed became a symbol of dishonor and a constant reminder of the man's failure to fulfill his duty.
Maintaining lineage: By ensuring the brother marries the widow, the practice ensures the lineage of the deceased man continues on through the birth of a male heir.
Significance and Interpretation:
Preservation of Family and Land: In ancient Israelite society, family lineage and the inheritance of land were crucial for social stability and economic survival. The Levirate marriage system was designed to protect these elements.
Care for Widows: Widows in ancient societies were often vulnerable, lacking economic and social support. This practice provided a means of ensuring their well-being and preventing them from becoming destitute.
Cultural Context: It's essential to understand that this custom was specific to ancient Israelite society and should be interpreted within its historical and cultural context.
Moral Dilemma: Some modern scholars and ethicists debate the morality of the Levirate marriage, particularly regarding the potential for coercion or the exploitation of women.
In summary, Deuteronomy 25:10 is a powerful verse that underscores the importance of the Levirate marriage custom in ancient Israel. It highlights the shame and lasting social consequences associated with refusing to fulfill one's duty to perpetuate a deceased brother's lineage. The phrase "The house of him who had his shoe removed" became a derogatory label, a public mark of dishonor for the man and his family.