Deuteronomy 22:13 - If any man takes a wife, and goes in to her, hates her,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Deuteronomy 22:13" mean?
Deuteronomy 22:13 describes a hypothetical situation where a man marries a woman and then claims to dislike her. The verse itself is part of a larger passage (Deuteronomy 22:13-19) that outlines the legal and social ramifications of such an accusation.
Here's a breakdown of the verse and its context:
"If any man takes a wife, and goes in to her...": This simply means that a man has married a woman and consummated the marriage through sexual intercourse.
"...hates her...": This is the core issue. The man develops an aversion or dislike for his wife after the marriage has been consummated. The reason for this hatred isn't specified in this verse, but the following verses suggest it's related to an accusation about her virginity.
Understanding the Context (Deuteronomy 22:13-19):
The passage goes on to describe what happens next. The man not only dislikes his wife, but he also:
1. Accuses her of premarital sex: He makes "scandalous charges" against her, claiming she was not a virgin when they married. This accusation was very serious in ancient Israelite society, as a woman's virginity was highly valued.
2. Spreads a bad reputation: He publicly defames her.
The Consequences (Deuteronomy 22:15-19):
The passage then describes the legal process:
1. The woman's parents defend her: The woman's parents are obligated to provide proof of her virginity (typically a blood-stained cloth from the wedding night).
2. Judgment by the elders: The elders of the town act as judges.
3. If the accusation is false:
The man is fined 100 shekels of silver, which is given to the woman's father.
He is forbidden from divorcing her for the rest of his life. (He is obligated to stay married to her.)
He is punished because he has slandered an Israelite virgin.
Key Interpretations and Implications:
Protecting Women: The primary purpose of this law seems to be to protect women from false accusations and unjust divorces. In a patriarchal society where women had limited rights, this law aimed to provide some recourse against a husband who might arbitrarily decide to divorce his wife based on unfounded claims.
Value of Virginity: The law reflects the high value placed on female virginity in that culture. This was tied to issues of family honor, lineage, and property rights.
Consequences for False Accusations: The severe penalties for false accusations served as a deterrent and emphasized the importance of truth and justice.
Limited Divorce: While divorce was permitted in some circumstances in the Old Testament, this passage specifically prevents the man from divorcing his wife if his accusation of premarital sex is proven false.
Social Control: Laws like this also served as a form of social control, reinforcing societal norms and expectations regarding marriage and sexual conduct.
Modern Relevance (Considerations):
It's crucial to understand this passage within its historical and cultural context. Modern interpretations must consider:
Changing Social Norms: Contemporary views on marriage, sexuality, and gender roles differ significantly from those of ancient Israel.
Equality: Modern interpretations should prioritize gender equality and reject any interpretation that perpetuates harmful stereotypes or reinforces patriarchal structures.
Justice and Due Process: The emphasis on investigation and consequences for false accusations remains relevant, even if the specific penalties are no longer applicable.
In summary, Deuteronomy 22:13 is the starting point of a legal case where a man accuses his wife of not being a virgin at the time of their marriage. The passage aims to protect women from false accusations and ensure justice within the marital relationship. The consequences for a false accusation were severe, highlighting the seriousness of the charge and the societal importance of virginity in that time. While culturally specific, the core principles of justice and the protection of the vulnerable remain relevant for contemporary reflection.
Deuteronomy 22:13 - If any man takes a wife, and goes in to her, hates her,
What does "Deuteronomy 22:13" mean?
Deuteronomy 22:13 describes a hypothetical situation where a man marries a woman and then claims to dislike her. The verse itself is part of a larger passage (Deuteronomy 22:13-19) that outlines the legal and social ramifications of such an accusation.
Here's a breakdown of the verse and its context:
"If any man takes a wife, and goes in to her...": This simply means that a man has married a woman and consummated the marriage through sexual intercourse.
"...hates her...": This is the core issue. The man develops an aversion or dislike for his wife after the marriage has been consummated. The reason for this hatred isn't specified in this verse, but the following verses suggest it's related to an accusation about her virginity.
Understanding the Context (Deuteronomy 22:13-19):
The passage goes on to describe what happens next. The man not only dislikes his wife, but he also:
1. Accuses her of premarital sex: He makes "scandalous charges" against her, claiming she was not a virgin when they married. This accusation was very serious in ancient Israelite society, as a woman's virginity was highly valued.
2. Spreads a bad reputation: He publicly defames her.
The Consequences (Deuteronomy 22:15-19):
The passage then describes the legal process:
1. The woman's parents defend her: The woman's parents are obligated to provide proof of her virginity (typically a blood-stained cloth from the wedding night).
2. Judgment by the elders: The elders of the town act as judges.
3. If the accusation is false:
The man is fined 100 shekels of silver, which is given to the woman's father.
He is forbidden from divorcing her for the rest of his life. (He is obligated to stay married to her.)
He is punished because he has slandered an Israelite virgin.
Key Interpretations and Implications:
Protecting Women: The primary purpose of this law seems to be to protect women from false accusations and unjust divorces. In a patriarchal society where women had limited rights, this law aimed to provide some recourse against a husband who might arbitrarily decide to divorce his wife based on unfounded claims.
Value of Virginity: The law reflects the high value placed on female virginity in that culture. This was tied to issues of family honor, lineage, and property rights.
Consequences for False Accusations: The severe penalties for false accusations served as a deterrent and emphasized the importance of truth and justice.
Limited Divorce: While divorce was permitted in some circumstances in the Old Testament, this passage specifically prevents the man from divorcing his wife if his accusation of premarital sex is proven false.
Social Control: Laws like this also served as a form of social control, reinforcing societal norms and expectations regarding marriage and sexual conduct.
Modern Relevance (Considerations):
It's crucial to understand this passage within its historical and cultural context. Modern interpretations must consider:
Changing Social Norms: Contemporary views on marriage, sexuality, and gender roles differ significantly from those of ancient Israel.
Equality: Modern interpretations should prioritize gender equality and reject any interpretation that perpetuates harmful stereotypes or reinforces patriarchal structures.
Justice and Due Process: The emphasis on investigation and consequences for false accusations remains relevant, even if the specific penalties are no longer applicable.
In summary, Deuteronomy 22:13 is the starting point of a legal case where a man accuses his wife of not being a virgin at the time of their marriage. The passage aims to protect women from false accusations and ensure justice within the marital relationship. The consequences for a false accusation were severe, highlighting the seriousness of the charge and the societal importance of virginity in that time. While culturally specific, the core principles of justice and the protection of the vulnerable remain relevant for contemporary reflection.