Deuteronomy 20:17 - but you shall utterly destroy them: the Hittite, the Amorite, the Canaanite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite; as Yahweh your God has commanded you;
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Deuteronomy 20:17" mean?
Deuteronomy 20:17 is a particularly difficult and often debated verse. Here's a breakdown of its meaning within its historical and theological context:
Literal Interpretation:
The verse commands the Israelites to completely destroy (utterly destroy) six specific groups of people: the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites.
This destruction is presented as a direct command from Yahweh (the Hebrew name for God).
Historical Context:
Conquest of Canaan: Deuteronomy recounts Moses's final speeches to the Israelites as they prepare to enter the Promised Land (Canaan). The book provides laws and guidelines for their future life in this new territory.
"Herem" Warfare: The term "utterly destroy" often relates to the concept of herem warfare. Herem involved the complete dedication of captured people and property to God, often through destruction. This was practiced in the Ancient Near East (ANE), though the reasons for it and scale varied. Some scholars have noted that descriptions in Deuteronomy and Joshua are likely exaggerated and rhetorical.
Religious Differences: The people listed practiced different religions and customs than the Israelites. The command to destroy them is related to the Israelites preserving their own faith and avoiding religious syncretism (mixing of religions).
Theological Interpretations and Challenges:
Divine Command Theory: Some interpret this verse through the lens of Divine Command Theory, which posits that morality is determined by God's commands. If God commands something, it is inherently good, regardless of our human understanding.
Moral Objections: This verse is a major ethical challenge for many modern readers. The idea of a God commanding genocide is deeply troubling and clashes with contemporary values of human rights and the sanctity of life.
Alternative Interpretations:
Hyperbole and Rhetoric: Some scholars argue that the language is hyperbolic (exaggerated) and not meant to be taken literally. Ancient Near Eastern texts often used exaggerated language to describe military victories.
Spiritual Warfare: Some interpret the destruction of these groups symbolically, representing the overcoming of sin and evil influences in the lives of believers.
Specific Circumstances: Others suggest that the command was specific to the historical context of the conquest of Canaan and not a universal command applicable to all times and places.
Limited Scope: It has also been suggested that the herem was limited to specific cities or groups that posed an imminent threat to Israel's religious and national identity.
Progressive Revelation: Another approach is to view the Old Testament as a progressive revelation of God's character. While the Old Testament reflects a particular stage in the understanding of God's will, the New Testament, particularly the teachings of Jesus, presents a more complete and nuanced picture of God's love and mercy.
Punishment for Sin: Some understand the destruction as a form of divine judgment on the Canaanites for their wickedness and idolatry. This is often based on other passages in the Old Testament that describe the Canaanites' practices as morally abhorrent.
Key Considerations:
Context: It is crucial to read this verse within the broader context of Deuteronomy and the Old Testament as a whole.
Ancient Near Eastern Culture: Understanding the cultural practices and warfare conventions of the Ancient Near East is essential for interpreting the text accurately.
Theological Framework: One's own theological framework will significantly influence how one understands and responds to this verse.
Moral Discernment: It is important to grapple honestly with the moral challenges posed by this verse and to seek interpretations that are consistent with one's understanding of God's character and justice.
In Conclusion:
Deuteronomy 20:17 is a complex and morally challenging verse. Its interpretation requires careful consideration of its historical context, literary style, and theological implications. There is no single, universally accepted interpretation, and different perspectives offer varying degrees of understanding and resolution to the ethical dilemmas it raises. It's a verse that demands humility, critical thinking, and a willingness to grapple with difficult questions about the nature of God, justice, and violence.
Deuteronomy 20:17 - but you shall utterly destroy them: the Hittite, the Amorite, the Canaanite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite; as Yahweh your God has commanded you;
What does "Deuteronomy 20:17" mean?
Deuteronomy 20:17 is a particularly difficult and often debated verse. Here's a breakdown of its meaning within its historical and theological context:
Literal Interpretation:
The verse commands the Israelites to completely destroy (utterly destroy) six specific groups of people: the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites.
This destruction is presented as a direct command from Yahweh (the Hebrew name for God).
Historical Context:
Conquest of Canaan: Deuteronomy recounts Moses's final speeches to the Israelites as they prepare to enter the Promised Land (Canaan). The book provides laws and guidelines for their future life in this new territory.
"Herem" Warfare: The term "utterly destroy" often relates to the concept of herem warfare. Herem involved the complete dedication of captured people and property to God, often through destruction. This was practiced in the Ancient Near East (ANE), though the reasons for it and scale varied. Some scholars have noted that descriptions in Deuteronomy and Joshua are likely exaggerated and rhetorical.
Religious Differences: The people listed practiced different religions and customs than the Israelites. The command to destroy them is related to the Israelites preserving their own faith and avoiding religious syncretism (mixing of religions).
Theological Interpretations and Challenges:
Divine Command Theory: Some interpret this verse through the lens of Divine Command Theory, which posits that morality is determined by God's commands. If God commands something, it is inherently good, regardless of our human understanding.
Moral Objections: This verse is a major ethical challenge for many modern readers. The idea of a God commanding genocide is deeply troubling and clashes with contemporary values of human rights and the sanctity of life.
Alternative Interpretations:
Hyperbole and Rhetoric: Some scholars argue that the language is hyperbolic (exaggerated) and not meant to be taken literally. Ancient Near Eastern texts often used exaggerated language to describe military victories.
Spiritual Warfare: Some interpret the destruction of these groups symbolically, representing the overcoming of sin and evil influences in the lives of believers.
Specific Circumstances: Others suggest that the command was specific to the historical context of the conquest of Canaan and not a universal command applicable to all times and places.
Limited Scope: It has also been suggested that the herem was limited to specific cities or groups that posed an imminent threat to Israel's religious and national identity.
Progressive Revelation: Another approach is to view the Old Testament as a progressive revelation of God's character. While the Old Testament reflects a particular stage in the understanding of God's will, the New Testament, particularly the teachings of Jesus, presents a more complete and nuanced picture of God's love and mercy.
Punishment for Sin: Some understand the destruction as a form of divine judgment on the Canaanites for their wickedness and idolatry. This is often based on other passages in the Old Testament that describe the Canaanites' practices as morally abhorrent.
Key Considerations:
Context: It is crucial to read this verse within the broader context of Deuteronomy and the Old Testament as a whole.
Ancient Near Eastern Culture: Understanding the cultural practices and warfare conventions of the Ancient Near East is essential for interpreting the text accurately.
Theological Framework: One's own theological framework will significantly influence how one understands and responds to this verse.
Moral Discernment: It is important to grapple honestly with the moral challenges posed by this verse and to seek interpretations that are consistent with one's understanding of God's character and justice.
In Conclusion:
Deuteronomy 20:17 is a complex and morally challenging verse. Its interpretation requires careful consideration of its historical context, literary style, and theological implications. There is no single, universally accepted interpretation, and different perspectives offer varying degrees of understanding and resolution to the ethical dilemmas it raises. It's a verse that demands humility, critical thinking, and a willingness to grapple with difficult questions about the nature of God, justice, and violence.