Acts 7:39 - to whom our fathers wouldn’t be obedient, but rejected him, and turned back in their hearts to Egypt,
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Acts 7:39" mean?
This verse, Acts 7:39, is part of Stephen's speech to the Sanhedrin (Jewish high court) in Jerusalem, recounting the history of Israel and accusing them of rejecting God's messengers, just as their ancestors did. Let's break it down:
"to whom our fathers wouldn't be obedient": This refers to Moses. God had chosen Moses to lead the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt and to receive God's law. However, the Israelites frequently disobeyed Moses and, by extension, disobeyed God's commands and leadership.
"but rejected him": They didn't just passively disobey; they actively rejected Moses's authority and God's plan. This rejection manifested in various ways, such as complaining about the lack of food and water in the desert, questioning Moses's leadership, and even wanting to choose a new leader to return to Egypt.
"and turned back in their hearts to Egypt": This is a crucial part of the verse. It highlights that even though they were physically free from Egypt, their desires and allegiance were still tied to their former life of slavery. "In their hearts" means that while they may have been marching through the desert towards the Promised Land, they were longing for the perceived security and comfort of Egypt, even if it meant being slaves. They remembered the food they had there (Num. 11:5) and idealized their past.
Overall Meaning:
Stephen uses this verse to illustrate the Israelites' persistent rebellion against God's will. He is arguing that the Sanhedrin, by rejecting Jesus, are repeating the sins of their ancestors who rejected Moses and longed for their old life of bondage. The core idea is that the Israelites preferred the familiar (Egypt) over the new and challenging path God had laid out for them (freedom and a covenant relationship). They were unwilling to fully trust in God's provision and leadership.
Significance in Stephen's Speech:
This verse is a key element in Stephen's defense (though it ultimately leads to his martyrdom). He argues that the current Jewish leaders are not honoring the traditions of their ancestors but are actually repeating their worst mistakes. By pointing to the Israelites' historical rejection of God's messengers, Stephen is implying that the Sanhedrin's rejection of Jesus is part of a pattern of disobedience and resistance to God's will. The speech argues that God's plan was never confined to a specific location or institution (like the Temple), but was always about a relationship with Him through faith and obedience, something the Israelites consistently failed to grasp.
Acts 7:39 - to whom our fathers wouldn’t be obedient, but rejected him, and turned back in their hearts to Egypt,
What does "Acts 7:39" mean?
This verse, Acts 7:39, is part of Stephen's speech to the Sanhedrin (Jewish high court) in Jerusalem, recounting the history of Israel and accusing them of rejecting God's messengers, just as their ancestors did. Let's break it down:
"to whom our fathers wouldn't be obedient": This refers to Moses. God had chosen Moses to lead the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt and to receive God's law. However, the Israelites frequently disobeyed Moses and, by extension, disobeyed God's commands and leadership.
"but rejected him": They didn't just passively disobey; they actively rejected Moses's authority and God's plan. This rejection manifested in various ways, such as complaining about the lack of food and water in the desert, questioning Moses's leadership, and even wanting to choose a new leader to return to Egypt.
"and turned back in their hearts to Egypt": This is a crucial part of the verse. It highlights that even though they were physically free from Egypt, their desires and allegiance were still tied to their former life of slavery. "In their hearts" means that while they may have been marching through the desert towards the Promised Land, they were longing for the perceived security and comfort of Egypt, even if it meant being slaves. They remembered the food they had there (Num. 11:5) and idealized their past.
Overall Meaning:
Stephen uses this verse to illustrate the Israelites' persistent rebellion against God's will. He is arguing that the Sanhedrin, by rejecting Jesus, are repeating the sins of their ancestors who rejected Moses and longed for their old life of bondage. The core idea is that the Israelites preferred the familiar (Egypt) over the new and challenging path God had laid out for them (freedom and a covenant relationship). They were unwilling to fully trust in God's provision and leadership.
Significance in Stephen's Speech:
This verse is a key element in Stephen's defense (though it ultimately leads to his martyrdom). He argues that the current Jewish leaders are not honoring the traditions of their ancestors but are actually repeating their worst mistakes. By pointing to the Israelites' historical rejection of God's messengers, Stephen is implying that the Sanhedrin's rejection of Jesus is part of a pattern of disobedience and resistance to God's will. The speech argues that God's plan was never confined to a specific location or institution (like the Temple), but was always about a relationship with Him through faith and obedience, something the Israelites consistently failed to grasp.