Acts 4:6 - Annas the high priest was there, with Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and as many as were relatives of the high priest.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "Acts 4:6" mean?
Acts 4:6 is part of the story of the Apostles Peter and John being arrested for healing a lame man and preaching about Jesus. The verse tells us who was in attendance at the meeting of the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council, that interrogated them. Here's a breakdown of what the verse means:
"Annas the high priest was there, with Caiaphas..." While Caiaphas was the current, official high priest at the time, Annas had previously held the position. Annas remained a very influential figure, and some scholars believe he wielded significant behind-the-scenes power. Both Annas and Caiaphas were key figures in the Jewish leadership at the time and hostile to Jesus and his followers.
"...John, Alexander..." These are likely other prominent members of the Jewish ruling class or priests. The Bible doesn't provide further information about their identities.
"...and as many as were relatives of the high priest." This indicates that the Sanhedrin meeting was packed with members of the high priestly family. This highlights the strong familial ties and political power concentrated within the priestly aristocracy. It also shows that opposition to the apostles was widespread amongst the ruling class.
In summary, the verse emphasizes:
The authority and composition of the Sanhedrin: The presence of Annas (a former high priest), Caiaphas (the current high priest), other named individuals, and many relatives of the high priest, shows that the highest echelons of Jewish authority were present to deal with Peter and John.
The opposition to the apostles: The fact that this powerful group convened to question Peter and John illustrates the threat that the apostles' message and actions posed to the established religious order.
The potential for bias: The large number of high priestly relatives suggests that the Sanhedrin's judgment might have been influenced by their vested interests and opposition to anything that challenged their authority.
Therefore, Acts 4:6 is not just a list of names. It reveals the power dynamics and potential for injustice that Peter and John faced as they proclaimed the Gospel in Jerusalem.
Acts 4:6 - Annas the high priest was there, with Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and as many as were relatives of the high priest.
What does "Acts 4:6" mean?
Acts 4:6 is part of the story of the Apostles Peter and John being arrested for healing a lame man and preaching about Jesus. The verse tells us who was in attendance at the meeting of the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council, that interrogated them. Here's a breakdown of what the verse means:
"Annas the high priest was there, with Caiaphas..." While Caiaphas was the current, official high priest at the time, Annas had previously held the position. Annas remained a very influential figure, and some scholars believe he wielded significant behind-the-scenes power. Both Annas and Caiaphas were key figures in the Jewish leadership at the time and hostile to Jesus and his followers.
"...John, Alexander..." These are likely other prominent members of the Jewish ruling class or priests. The Bible doesn't provide further information about their identities.
"...and as many as were relatives of the high priest." This indicates that the Sanhedrin meeting was packed with members of the high priestly family. This highlights the strong familial ties and political power concentrated within the priestly aristocracy. It also shows that opposition to the apostles was widespread amongst the ruling class.
In summary, the verse emphasizes:
The authority and composition of the Sanhedrin: The presence of Annas (a former high priest), Caiaphas (the current high priest), other named individuals, and many relatives of the high priest, shows that the highest echelons of Jewish authority were present to deal with Peter and John.
The opposition to the apostles: The fact that this powerful group convened to question Peter and John illustrates the threat that the apostles' message and actions posed to the established religious order.
The potential for bias: The large number of high priestly relatives suggests that the Sanhedrin's judgment might have been influenced by their vested interests and opposition to anything that challenged their authority.
Therefore, Acts 4:6 is not just a list of names. It reveals the power dynamics and potential for injustice that Peter and John faced as they proclaimed the Gospel in Jerusalem.