2 samuel 14:7 - Behold, the whole family has risen against your servant, and they say, ‘Deliver him who struck his brother, that we may kill him for the life of his brother whom he killed, and so destroy the heir also.’ Thus they would quench my coal which is left, and would leave to my husband neither name nor remainder on the surface of the earth.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "2 samuel 14:7" mean?
This verse from 2 Samuel 14:7 is part of the fabricated story told by the woman of Tekoa to King David at Joab's instruction. It's designed to subtly influence David's decision regarding his son Absalom, who had killed his half-brother Amnon. Let's break down the meaning:
"Behold, the whole family has risen against your servant...": The woman paints a picture of overwhelming pressure from the rest of her family. They're united in their demand for justice.
"...and they say, ‘Deliver him who struck his brother, that we may kill him for the life of his brother whom he killed...": This is the core demand. The family wants to exact the customary blood revenge for the murder of the brother. They want the remaining brother (the one who committed the murder) handed over to them so they can kill him. This is based on the ancient principle of "an eye for an eye."
"...and so destroy the heir also.’": This is the most critical part of the verse for David to hear. The family is not just seeking justice; they threaten to eliminate the heir. This is crucial because David is acutely aware of the importance of succession in the kingdom.
"Thus they would quench my coal which is left...": This is a metaphor for extinguishing the last spark of hope or life in the family line. The "coal" represents the last surviving son, who is essential for continuing the family name and lineage.
"...and would leave to my husband neither name nor remainder on the surface of the earth.”": This emphasizes the devastating consequence of killing the remaining son. The family name would be wiped out, and there would be no descendants to carry on the legacy. They would be forgotten.
In the context of the Absalom situation:
The woman's "son" is a parallel to Absalom.
The slain brother is a parallel to Amnon.
The "family" demanding justice represents the people who believe Absalom should be punished for Amnon's murder.
The "heir" refers to Absalom's potential claim to the throne (though this is subtle, as the woman isn't explicitly stating Absalom is David's direct heir in this scenario).
The "quenched coal" and "no name or remainder" highlight the irreversible consequences of killing Absalom, especially in terms of the stability of David's kingdom and the succession.
The Purpose:
The woman's story is carefully crafted to:
1. Appeal to David's sense of justice and mercy: By presenting a scenario where killing the last son would completely destroy a family, she appeals to David's compassion.
2. Highlight the potential consequences of punishing Absalom: By emphasizing the loss of the heir, she makes David consider the wider implications of his actions on the kingdom's future.
3. Subtly suggest a path for reconciliation: By showing that mercy can be shown without undermining the integrity of the kingdom.
The overarching goal is to persuade David to allow Absalom to return to Jerusalem and eventually be fully reconciled, without explicitly demanding it. This avoids directly challenging David's authority or appearing to support murder. Joab, by using this cunning approach, hopes to reunite David with his son and ultimately quell the potential for further division and conflict within the kingdom.
2 samuel 14:7 - Behold, the whole family has risen against your servant, and they say, ‘Deliver him who struck his brother, that we may kill him for the life of his brother whom he killed, and so destroy the heir also.’ Thus they would quench my coal which is left, and would leave to my husband neither name nor remainder on the surface of the earth.”
What does "2 samuel 14:7" mean?
This verse from 2 Samuel 14:7 is part of the fabricated story told by the woman of Tekoa to King David at Joab's instruction. It's designed to subtly influence David's decision regarding his son Absalom, who had killed his half-brother Amnon. Let's break down the meaning:
"Behold, the whole family has risen against your servant...": The woman paints a picture of overwhelming pressure from the rest of her family. They're united in their demand for justice.
"...and they say, ‘Deliver him who struck his brother, that we may kill him for the life of his brother whom he killed...": This is the core demand. The family wants to exact the customary blood revenge for the murder of the brother. They want the remaining brother (the one who committed the murder) handed over to them so they can kill him. This is based on the ancient principle of "an eye for an eye."
"...and so destroy the heir also.’": This is the most critical part of the verse for David to hear. The family is not just seeking justice; they threaten to eliminate the heir. This is crucial because David is acutely aware of the importance of succession in the kingdom.
"Thus they would quench my coal which is left...": This is a metaphor for extinguishing the last spark of hope or life in the family line. The "coal" represents the last surviving son, who is essential for continuing the family name and lineage.
"...and would leave to my husband neither name nor remainder on the surface of the earth.”": This emphasizes the devastating consequence of killing the remaining son. The family name would be wiped out, and there would be no descendants to carry on the legacy. They would be forgotten.
In the context of the Absalom situation:
The woman's "son" is a parallel to Absalom.
The slain brother is a parallel to Amnon.
The "family" demanding justice represents the people who believe Absalom should be punished for Amnon's murder.
The "heir" refers to Absalom's potential claim to the throne (though this is subtle, as the woman isn't explicitly stating Absalom is David's direct heir in this scenario).
The "quenched coal" and "no name or remainder" highlight the irreversible consequences of killing Absalom, especially in terms of the stability of David's kingdom and the succession.
The Purpose:
The woman's story is carefully crafted to:
1. Appeal to David's sense of justice and mercy: By presenting a scenario where killing the last son would completely destroy a family, she appeals to David's compassion.
2. Highlight the potential consequences of punishing Absalom: By emphasizing the loss of the heir, she makes David consider the wider implications of his actions on the kingdom's future.
3. Subtly suggest a path for reconciliation: By showing that mercy can be shown without undermining the integrity of the kingdom.
The overarching goal is to persuade David to allow Absalom to return to Jerusalem and eventually be fully reconciled, without explicitly demanding it. This avoids directly challenging David's authority or appearing to support murder. Joab, by using this cunning approach, hopes to reunite David with his son and ultimately quell the potential for further division and conflict within the kingdom.