2 kings 14:28 - Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, and all that he did, and his might, how he fought, and how he recovered Damascus, and Hamath, which had belonged to Judah, for Israel, aren’t they written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "2 kings 14:28" mean?
This verse is a standard concluding statement about a king in the books of Kings. It essentially summarizes the reign of Jeroboam II and directs the reader to another, more comprehensive source for more details. Let's break it down:
"Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, and all that he did, and his might..." This refers to all the actions, accomplishments, and displays of power during Jeroboam II's reign that weren't detailed in the preceding narrative. It's a broad statement covering everything he did as king.
"...how he fought, and how he recovered Damascus, and Hamath, which had belonged to Judah, for Israel..." This gives a specific example of Jeroboam's actions: his military achievements. He recaptured Damascus and Hamath (cities in modern-day Syria) from whichever power had previously held them. Importantly, it highlights that these cities had belonged to Judah, the southern kingdom, but Jeroboam II recovered them for Israel, the northern kingdom. This suggests a period of strength for Israel under Jeroboam II and potential conflict (or at least territorial claims) with Judah.
"...aren’t they written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?" This is the key to understanding the verse. It indicates that there was another written record, "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel," which contained more detailed information about Jeroboam II's reign. This book is now lost to us, but it would have been a historical record kept by the northern kingdom of Israel. The author of 2 Kings is telling the reader that if they want to know more about Jeroboam II, they should consult that other source.
In essence, the verse serves three main purposes:
1. Summarization: It provides a brief overview of Jeroboam II's reign.
2. Direction: It points the reader to another source for more information.
3. Historical Context: It gives us a glimpse into the nature of historical record-keeping in ancient Israel.
Important Considerations:
The mention of recovering Damascus and Hamath, previously belonging to Judah, suggests a complex political and historical landscape where the kingdoms of Israel and Judah interacted, often with conflicting claims.
The existence of "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel" is significant. It suggests that the ancient Israelites kept official records of their kings' reigns. This helps us understand the context of the Bible as being written within a broader historical and literary tradition.
Since this "book of the chronicles" is no longer available, what we read in 2 Kings (and 1 Kings) provides the most complete narrative we have about Jeroboam II and other kings of Israel. The author of 2 Kings selectively chose what to include in his narrative, likely based on his theological and historical perspectives.
2 kings 14:28 - Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, and all that he did, and his might, how he fought, and how he recovered Damascus, and Hamath, which had belonged to Judah, for Israel, aren’t they written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?
What does "2 kings 14:28" mean?
This verse is a standard concluding statement about a king in the books of Kings. It essentially summarizes the reign of Jeroboam II and directs the reader to another, more comprehensive source for more details. Let's break it down:
"Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, and all that he did, and his might..." This refers to all the actions, accomplishments, and displays of power during Jeroboam II's reign that weren't detailed in the preceding narrative. It's a broad statement covering everything he did as king.
"...how he fought, and how he recovered Damascus, and Hamath, which had belonged to Judah, for Israel..." This gives a specific example of Jeroboam's actions: his military achievements. He recaptured Damascus and Hamath (cities in modern-day Syria) from whichever power had previously held them. Importantly, it highlights that these cities had belonged to Judah, the southern kingdom, but Jeroboam II recovered them for Israel, the northern kingdom. This suggests a period of strength for Israel under Jeroboam II and potential conflict (or at least territorial claims) with Judah.
"...aren’t they written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?" This is the key to understanding the verse. It indicates that there was another written record, "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel," which contained more detailed information about Jeroboam II's reign. This book is now lost to us, but it would have been a historical record kept by the northern kingdom of Israel. The author of 2 Kings is telling the reader that if they want to know more about Jeroboam II, they should consult that other source.
In essence, the verse serves three main purposes:
1. Summarization: It provides a brief overview of Jeroboam II's reign.
2. Direction: It points the reader to another source for more information.
3. Historical Context: It gives us a glimpse into the nature of historical record-keeping in ancient Israel.
Important Considerations:
The mention of recovering Damascus and Hamath, previously belonging to Judah, suggests a complex political and historical landscape where the kingdoms of Israel and Judah interacted, often with conflicting claims.
The existence of "the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel" is significant. It suggests that the ancient Israelites kept official records of their kings' reigns. This helps us understand the context of the Bible as being written within a broader historical and literary tradition.
Since this "book of the chronicles" is no longer available, what we read in 2 Kings (and 1 Kings) provides the most complete narrative we have about Jeroboam II and other kings of Israel. The author of 2 Kings selectively chose what to include in his narrative, likely based on his theological and historical perspectives.