2 chronicles 28:6 - For Pekah the son of Remaliah killed in Judah one hundred twenty thousand in one day, all of them valiant men, because they had forsaken Yahweh, the God of their fathers.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "2 chronicles 28:6" mean?
This verse from 2 Chronicles 28:6 describes a devastating defeat suffered by Judah at the hands of the king of Israel, Pekah, son of Remaliah. Let's break down the meaning:
"For Pekah the son of Remaliah killed in Judah one hundred twenty thousand in one day...": This states that Pekah, who was the king of the northern kingdom of Israel, led his army in a bloody and decisive victory against Judah. The sheer number of casualties - 120,000 in a single day - indicates a massive and devastating defeat for Judah.
"...all of them valiant men...": The phrase "valiant men" suggests that those killed were soldiers or capable warriors, implying the loss was a significant blow to Judah's military strength and manpower. It wasn't a slaughter of the weak and helpless, but a defeat of capable fighting men.
"...because they had forsaken Yahweh, the God of their fathers.": This is the key to understanding the verse's religious perspective. The chronicler interprets the defeat as a direct consequence of Judah's unfaithfulness to God. "Forsaking Yahweh" means that the people of Judah had turned away from worshipping the God of their ancestors, likely by embracing foreign deities or engaging in practices considered idolatrous by the Deuteronomic law. The chronicler believed that God was actively involved in the affairs of nations, rewarding obedience and punishing disobedience. Therefore, the defeat was seen as divine punishment for their spiritual waywardness.
In summary, the verse conveys the following points:
A catastrophic military loss for Judah.
A significant depletion of Judah's military strength.
The Chronicler's theological interpretation of the event as divine retribution for Judah's abandonment of their faith in Yahweh.
Important Considerations:
Historical Accuracy: It is important to note that historical accounts in the Bible, particularly in Chronicles, often have a theological purpose. The numbers given in the verse, such as 120,000, may be exaggerated for emphasis. Archeological evidence and other historical sources offer different perspectives and interpretations of the events.
Theological Perspective: The chronicler's perspective is one of Deuteronomic theology, where obedience to God is directly linked to national prosperity and disobedience to national disaster. This is a common theme in the historical books of the Old Testament.
Understanding the Context: To fully understand the verse, it's important to read the surrounding chapters to gain context about the political and religious situation in Judah and Israel at the time. King Ahaz of Judah was considered particularly wicked by the Chronicler.
Therefore, this verse represents more than just a historical account of a battle. It is a theological statement about the consequences of disobedience to God, written from the perspective of the Chronicler and with an emphasis on the religious interpretation of events.
2 chronicles 28:6 - For Pekah the son of Remaliah killed in Judah one hundred twenty thousand in one day, all of them valiant men, because they had forsaken Yahweh, the God of their fathers.
What does "2 chronicles 28:6" mean?
This verse from 2 Chronicles 28:6 describes a devastating defeat suffered by Judah at the hands of the king of Israel, Pekah, son of Remaliah. Let's break down the meaning:
"For Pekah the son of Remaliah killed in Judah one hundred twenty thousand in one day...": This states that Pekah, who was the king of the northern kingdom of Israel, led his army in a bloody and decisive victory against Judah. The sheer number of casualties - 120,000 in a single day - indicates a massive and devastating defeat for Judah.
"...all of them valiant men...": The phrase "valiant men" suggests that those killed were soldiers or capable warriors, implying the loss was a significant blow to Judah's military strength and manpower. It wasn't a slaughter of the weak and helpless, but a defeat of capable fighting men.
"...because they had forsaken Yahweh, the God of their fathers.": This is the key to understanding the verse's religious perspective. The chronicler interprets the defeat as a direct consequence of Judah's unfaithfulness to God. "Forsaking Yahweh" means that the people of Judah had turned away from worshipping the God of their ancestors, likely by embracing foreign deities or engaging in practices considered idolatrous by the Deuteronomic law. The chronicler believed that God was actively involved in the affairs of nations, rewarding obedience and punishing disobedience. Therefore, the defeat was seen as divine punishment for their spiritual waywardness.
In summary, the verse conveys the following points:
A catastrophic military loss for Judah.
A significant depletion of Judah's military strength.
The Chronicler's theological interpretation of the event as divine retribution for Judah's abandonment of their faith in Yahweh.
Important Considerations:
Historical Accuracy: It is important to note that historical accounts in the Bible, particularly in Chronicles, often have a theological purpose. The numbers given in the verse, such as 120,000, may be exaggerated for emphasis. Archeological evidence and other historical sources offer different perspectives and interpretations of the events.
Theological Perspective: The chronicler's perspective is one of Deuteronomic theology, where obedience to God is directly linked to national prosperity and disobedience to national disaster. This is a common theme in the historical books of the Old Testament.
Understanding the Context: To fully understand the verse, it's important to read the surrounding chapters to gain context about the political and religious situation in Judah and Israel at the time. King Ahaz of Judah was considered particularly wicked by the Chronicler.
Therefore, this verse represents more than just a historical account of a battle. It is a theological statement about the consequences of disobedience to God, written from the perspective of the Chronicler and with an emphasis on the religious interpretation of events.