2 chronicles 16:3 - “Let there be a treaty between me and you, as there was between my father and your father. Behold, I have sent you silver and gold. Go, break your treaty with Baasha king of Israel, that he may depart from me.”
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "2 chronicles 16:3" mean?
This verse is from 2 Chronicles 16:3 and describes a politically motivated act of bribery by King Asa of Judah to King Ben-Hadad I of Syria (also known as Aram). Let's break down what it means:
"Let there be a treaty between me and you, as there was between my father and your father." Asa is proposing an alliance or treaty with Ben-Hadad, mirroring the alliances that existed between their respective fathers. This establishes a sense of continuity and mutual benefit in the relationship.
"Behold, I have sent you silver and gold." This is the key part. Asa is offering a substantial bribe (silver and gold) to Ben-Hadad. This is a clear indication that Asa isn't just seeking a friendly alliance; he's trying to manipulate Ben-Hadad's actions.
"Go, break your treaty with Baasha king of Israel, that he may depart from me." This reveals Asa's true motive. Baasha, the king of Israel, was a constant threat to Judah, and he had been fortifying Ramah, a city near Judah's border, to prevent people from leaving or entering Asa's kingdom. Asa wants Ben-Hadad to break his existing treaty with Baasha (Israel). Asa believes that if Ben-Hadad attacks Israel, Baasha will be forced to withdraw his forces from Ramah to defend his own territory, thus relieving the pressure on Judah.
In essence, this verse depicts King Asa resorting to bribery and the breaking of existing treaties to protect his kingdom. He's sacrificing ethical behavior for political expediency. He's prioritizing his own security over maintaining a morally upright approach.
Consequences and Significance:
The text goes on to explain that Ben-Hadad accepts the bribe, attacks Israel, and Baasha is forced to withdraw. However, in the broader narrative, Asa's actions are criticized. A prophet rebukes Asa for relying on a foreign king (Ben-Hadad) instead of trusting in God for deliverance. This decision is seen as a lack of faith and ultimately leads to negative consequences for Asa later in his reign. This story highlights a recurring theme in the Old Testament: the importance of trusting in God rather than relying on human strategies and alliances.
2 chronicles 16:3 - “Let there be a treaty between me and you, as there was between my father and your father. Behold, I have sent you silver and gold. Go, break your treaty with Baasha king of Israel, that he may depart from me.”
What does "2 chronicles 16:3" mean?
This verse is from 2 Chronicles 16:3 and describes a politically motivated act of bribery by King Asa of Judah to King Ben-Hadad I of Syria (also known as Aram). Let's break down what it means:
"Let there be a treaty between me and you, as there was between my father and your father." Asa is proposing an alliance or treaty with Ben-Hadad, mirroring the alliances that existed between their respective fathers. This establishes a sense of continuity and mutual benefit in the relationship.
"Behold, I have sent you silver and gold." This is the key part. Asa is offering a substantial bribe (silver and gold) to Ben-Hadad. This is a clear indication that Asa isn't just seeking a friendly alliance; he's trying to manipulate Ben-Hadad's actions.
"Go, break your treaty with Baasha king of Israel, that he may depart from me." This reveals Asa's true motive. Baasha, the king of Israel, was a constant threat to Judah, and he had been fortifying Ramah, a city near Judah's border, to prevent people from leaving or entering Asa's kingdom. Asa wants Ben-Hadad to break his existing treaty with Baasha (Israel). Asa believes that if Ben-Hadad attacks Israel, Baasha will be forced to withdraw his forces from Ramah to defend his own territory, thus relieving the pressure on Judah.
In essence, this verse depicts King Asa resorting to bribery and the breaking of existing treaties to protect his kingdom. He's sacrificing ethical behavior for political expediency. He's prioritizing his own security over maintaining a morally upright approach.
Consequences and Significance:
The text goes on to explain that Ben-Hadad accepts the bribe, attacks Israel, and Baasha is forced to withdraw. However, in the broader narrative, Asa's actions are criticized. A prophet rebukes Asa for relying on a foreign king (Ben-Hadad) instead of trusting in God for deliverance. This decision is seen as a lack of faith and ultimately leads to negative consequences for Asa later in his reign. This story highlights a recurring theme in the Old Testament: the importance of trusting in God rather than relying on human strategies and alliances.