1 kings 20:24 - Do this thing: take the kings away, every man out of his place, and put captains in their place.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "1 kings 20:24" mean?
This verse, 1 Kings 20:24, is part of a strategic suggestion made by the servants of King Ben-Hadad of Aram (Syria) to their king after they were defeated by King Ahab of Israel. Let's break it down:
"Do this thing:" This is simply an introduction to the advice they are about to give.
"Take the kings away, every man out of his place..." This is the core of the advice. The "kings" here likely refers to the 32 kings who were allied with Ben-Hadad and served under him, commanding their respective contingents. The servants are suggesting that Ben-Hadad remove these kings from their command positions. The phrase "every man out of his place" emphasizes a complete reshuffling of the army's structure.
"...and put captains in their place." Instead of the kings leading their armies, they should be replaced by "captains." This suggests lower-ranking, more professional, and likely Syrian-trained military officers.
The overall meaning and rationale behind this advice is as follows:
The servants believed that Aram's defeat was due to the fact that the Israelites' gods were "gods of the hills." The implication is that the Arameans' military structure and leadership, particularly the allied kings, were ill-suited for fighting in the hill country where the battle took place.
By replacing the kings with captains, the servants were hoping to:
Professionalize the army: The captains would be professional soldiers, presumably with more tactical skill and experience in fighting.
Unify Command: Having captains directly under Ben-Hadad would create a more unified command structure, rather than a collection of allied kings each with their own agenda and fighting style. The kings were likely autonomous, commanding their own contingents without strict Syrian control.
Better Adapt to Terrain: The captains might have been perceived as more adaptable and better equipped to fight in different terrains.
In short, the advice was a strategic overhaul of the Aramean army, aiming to correct perceived weaknesses in leadership, command structure, and adaptability that led to their initial defeat. They believed that a more professional and unified army, led by skilled captains, would be more successful in a rematch, especially if they could fight on more favorable terrain.
1 kings 20:24 - Do this thing: take the kings away, every man out of his place, and put captains in their place.
What does "1 kings 20:24" mean?
This verse, 1 Kings 20:24, is part of a strategic suggestion made by the servants of King Ben-Hadad of Aram (Syria) to their king after they were defeated by King Ahab of Israel. Let's break it down:
"Do this thing:" This is simply an introduction to the advice they are about to give.
"Take the kings away, every man out of his place..." This is the core of the advice. The "kings" here likely refers to the 32 kings who were allied with Ben-Hadad and served under him, commanding their respective contingents. The servants are suggesting that Ben-Hadad remove these kings from their command positions. The phrase "every man out of his place" emphasizes a complete reshuffling of the army's structure.
"...and put captains in their place." Instead of the kings leading their armies, they should be replaced by "captains." This suggests lower-ranking, more professional, and likely Syrian-trained military officers.
The overall meaning and rationale behind this advice is as follows:
The servants believed that Aram's defeat was due to the fact that the Israelites' gods were "gods of the hills." The implication is that the Arameans' military structure and leadership, particularly the allied kings, were ill-suited for fighting in the hill country where the battle took place.
By replacing the kings with captains, the servants were hoping to:
Professionalize the army: The captains would be professional soldiers, presumably with more tactical skill and experience in fighting.
Unify Command: Having captains directly under Ben-Hadad would create a more unified command structure, rather than a collection of allied kings each with their own agenda and fighting style. The kings were likely autonomous, commanding their own contingents without strict Syrian control.
Better Adapt to Terrain: The captains might have been perceived as more adaptable and better equipped to fight in different terrains.
In short, the advice was a strategic overhaul of the Aramean army, aiming to correct perceived weaknesses in leadership, command structure, and adaptability that led to their initial defeat. They believed that a more professional and unified army, led by skilled captains, would be more successful in a rematch, especially if they could fight on more favorable terrain.