1 esdras 9:36 - All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "1 esdras 9:36" mean?
1 Esdras 9:36 states: "All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children."
This verse, and the surrounding passage, refers to a period after the Babylonian exile when the Jewish people were returning to Jerusalem to rebuild their society. A significant problem arose: many Jewish men had married foreign women, women who were not Jewish and often worshipped other gods.
Here's a breakdown of the meaning:
"All these had taken strange wives": "Strange wives" refers to women who were not of the Israelite faith and/or of different ethnicities. These marriages were considered a violation of Jewish law, which emphasized marrying within the community to maintain religious and cultural purity. Some sources argue that this was, at least in part, for economic reasons.
"and they put them away with their children": This is the most difficult and ethically troubling part of the verse. It means that the Jewish men divorced (or separated from) their foreign wives and, in most cases, sent them away, often along with their children.
Context and Interpretation:
The actions described in this passage are directly related to the reforms instigated by Ezra (or Esdras, as he's known in the Greek version of the book). Ezra saw these intermarriages as a grave sin, threatening the religious and cultural identity of the newly restored Jewish community.
Why was it considered a problem?
Religious Purity: Intermarriage was seen as leading to the adoption of foreign gods and practices, jeopardizing the covenant with God.
Cultural Identity: Maintaining a distinct Jewish identity in the face of surrounding cultures was a priority.
Land Inheritance: There may have been concerns about land inheritance and ensuring that Jewish land remained within the Jewish community.
Ethical Considerations:
The forced divorce and separation from children are deeply troubling to modern readers. It raises questions about fairness, compassion, and the treatment of women and children.
Different Perspectives:
Historical Context: It's important to understand the historical context. The survival of the Jewish people and their faith was seen as paramount. The actions were viewed as necessary to prevent the complete assimilation and disappearance of the community.
Criticism: Many modern scholars and theologians criticize the harshness of the actions, pointing to the suffering caused to the women and children involved.
Alternative Interpretations: Some suggest that "putting them away" might not always have meant complete abandonment, but rather a separation with some provisions. However, the text implies a severance of the relationship.
In Summary:
1 Esdras 9:36 describes a painful chapter in Jewish history. It highlights the tension between the desire to maintain religious purity and the human cost of such efforts. The verse reflects a strict interpretation of Jewish law that, while understandable in its historical context, raises serious ethical questions when viewed through a modern lens.
1 esdras 9:36 - All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children.
What does "1 esdras 9:36" mean?
1 Esdras 9:36 states: "All these had taken strange wives, and they put them away with their children."
This verse, and the surrounding passage, refers to a period after the Babylonian exile when the Jewish people were returning to Jerusalem to rebuild their society. A significant problem arose: many Jewish men had married foreign women, women who were not Jewish and often worshipped other gods.
Here's a breakdown of the meaning:
"All these had taken strange wives": "Strange wives" refers to women who were not of the Israelite faith and/or of different ethnicities. These marriages were considered a violation of Jewish law, which emphasized marrying within the community to maintain religious and cultural purity. Some sources argue that this was, at least in part, for economic reasons.
"and they put them away with their children": This is the most difficult and ethically troubling part of the verse. It means that the Jewish men divorced (or separated from) their foreign wives and, in most cases, sent them away, often along with their children.
Context and Interpretation:
The actions described in this passage are directly related to the reforms instigated by Ezra (or Esdras, as he's known in the Greek version of the book). Ezra saw these intermarriages as a grave sin, threatening the religious and cultural identity of the newly restored Jewish community.
Why was it considered a problem?
Religious Purity: Intermarriage was seen as leading to the adoption of foreign gods and practices, jeopardizing the covenant with God.
Cultural Identity: Maintaining a distinct Jewish identity in the face of surrounding cultures was a priority.
Land Inheritance: There may have been concerns about land inheritance and ensuring that Jewish land remained within the Jewish community.
Ethical Considerations:
The forced divorce and separation from children are deeply troubling to modern readers. It raises questions about fairness, compassion, and the treatment of women and children.
Different Perspectives:
Historical Context: It's important to understand the historical context. The survival of the Jewish people and their faith was seen as paramount. The actions were viewed as necessary to prevent the complete assimilation and disappearance of the community.
Criticism: Many modern scholars and theologians criticize the harshness of the actions, pointing to the suffering caused to the women and children involved.
Alternative Interpretations: Some suggest that "putting them away" might not always have meant complete abandonment, but rather a separation with some provisions. However, the text implies a severance of the relationship.
In Summary:
1 Esdras 9:36 describes a painful chapter in Jewish history. It highlights the tension between the desire to maintain religious purity and the human cost of such efforts. The verse reflects a strict interpretation of Jewish law that, while understandable in its historical context, raises serious ethical questions when viewed through a modern lens.