1 esdras 8:85 - Neither shall you⌃ seek to have peace with them forever, that you⌃ may be strong, and eat the good things of the land, and that you⌃ may leave it for an inheritance to your children for evermore.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "1 esdras 8:85" mean?
This verse from 1 Esdras 8:85 essentially advocates for complete separation and hostility from a particular group of people to ensure the long-term prosperity and security of the speaker's own community. Let's break it down:
"Neither shall you seek to have peace with them forever...": This is a straightforward command prohibiting any attempts at reconciliation, alliance, or peaceful coexistence with the specified group. This implies a deep-seated animosity and a belief that they are inherently untrustworthy or dangerous.
"...that you may be strong...": Maintaining distance and hostility is seen as a means of strengthening the speaker's community. This could be interpreted in a few ways:
Avoiding assimilation: Peaceful interaction might lead to cultural or religious assimilation, weakening the community's distinct identity and unity.
Preventing exploitation: The other group might be seen as a threat to their resources or power, and peace would allow them to exploit the speaker's community.
Maintaining martial preparedness: A constant state of tension would keep the community vigilant and militarily strong.
"...and eat the good things of the land...": By remaining separate and strong, the speaker's community can control and enjoy the resources of the land without interference or competition. This implies a desire for economic prosperity and dominance.
"...and that you may leave it for an inheritance to your children for evermore.": The ultimate goal is to secure the land and its resources for future generations. The separation and hostility are presented as necessary steps to ensure a lasting inheritance for their descendants. This highlights the importance of legacy and long-term security.
In essence, the verse promotes a policy of perpetual conflict and separation based on the belief that it is essential for the community's strength, prosperity, and the preservation of their inheritance. It's important to note the moral implications of such a stance, which may be considered ethically problematic in many contexts today.
Contextual Considerations:
Historical Setting: To fully understand the verse, you'd need to consider the historical context of 1 Esdras (which is considered apocryphal). Who is the "you" and who is the "them?" Understanding the relationship and conflicts between these groups would shed light on the motivations behind this command.
Religious Ideology: The verse reflects a particular worldview that prioritizes the security and well-being of a specific group above all else, even at the expense of peaceful relations with others. Understanding the religious or cultural values of the speaker's community is crucial for interpreting the verse.
Moral Implications: It's important to critically examine the ethical implications of advocating for perpetual conflict and separation. While the verse may be presented as a means of ensuring survival and prosperity, it also raises questions about justice, compassion, and the potential for violence.
1 esdras 8:85 - Neither shall you⌃ seek to have peace with them forever, that you⌃ may be strong, and eat the good things of the land, and that you⌃ may leave it for an inheritance to your children for evermore.
What does "1 esdras 8:85" mean?
This verse from 1 Esdras 8:85 essentially advocates for complete separation and hostility from a particular group of people to ensure the long-term prosperity and security of the speaker's own community. Let's break it down:
"Neither shall you seek to have peace with them forever...": This is a straightforward command prohibiting any attempts at reconciliation, alliance, or peaceful coexistence with the specified group. This implies a deep-seated animosity and a belief that they are inherently untrustworthy or dangerous.
"...that you may be strong...": Maintaining distance and hostility is seen as a means of strengthening the speaker's community. This could be interpreted in a few ways:
Avoiding assimilation: Peaceful interaction might lead to cultural or religious assimilation, weakening the community's distinct identity and unity.
Preventing exploitation: The other group might be seen as a threat to their resources or power, and peace would allow them to exploit the speaker's community.
Maintaining martial preparedness: A constant state of tension would keep the community vigilant and militarily strong.
"...and eat the good things of the land...": By remaining separate and strong, the speaker's community can control and enjoy the resources of the land without interference or competition. This implies a desire for economic prosperity and dominance.
"...and that you may leave it for an inheritance to your children for evermore.": The ultimate goal is to secure the land and its resources for future generations. The separation and hostility are presented as necessary steps to ensure a lasting inheritance for their descendants. This highlights the importance of legacy and long-term security.
In essence, the verse promotes a policy of perpetual conflict and separation based on the belief that it is essential for the community's strength, prosperity, and the preservation of their inheritance. It's important to note the moral implications of such a stance, which may be considered ethically problematic in many contexts today.
Contextual Considerations:
Historical Setting: To fully understand the verse, you'd need to consider the historical context of 1 Esdras (which is considered apocryphal). Who is the "you" and who is the "them?" Understanding the relationship and conflicts between these groups would shed light on the motivations behind this command.
Religious Ideology: The verse reflects a particular worldview that prioritizes the security and well-being of a specific group above all else, even at the expense of peaceful relations with others. Understanding the religious or cultural values of the speaker's community is crucial for interpreting the verse.
Moral Implications: It's important to critically examine the ethical implications of advocating for perpetual conflict and separation. While the verse may be presented as a means of ensuring survival and prosperity, it also raises questions about justice, compassion, and the potential for violence.