1 chronicles 2:34 - Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
Select Bible Verse
Filter Categories
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
R
S
T
U
V
W
What does "1 chronicles 2:34" mean?
This verse in 1 Chronicles 2:34 provides context for an unusual situation within a genealogy. Let's break it down:
"Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters." This establishes that Sheshan, a man in the lineage being traced, had only daughters and no male heirs. This was a significant issue in ancient Israelite society because inheritance and the continuation of the family name were typically passed down through sons.
"Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha." This introduces Jarha, a servant of Sheshan who was also an Egyptian. This is important because it sets the stage for an unconventional solution to the problem of Sheshan having no male heirs.
What does it MEAN in context?
The following verses reveal the significance of this information:
Sheshan gives his daughter to Jarha in marriage (1 Chronicles 2:35). This was likely done to ensure the continuation of Sheshan's lineage and property.
The marriage between Sheshan's daughter and Jarha results in a son, Attai (1 Chronicles 2:36). This son is considered the grandson and heir of Sheshan, even though he is descended through the female line and through an Egyptian.
Therefore, the verse's meaning is this:
It explains that Sheshan's lack of sons led to a departure from the traditional patrilineal inheritance. To ensure the continuation of his family line, he gave his daughter in marriage to his Egyptian servant, Jarha. This act, though unusual, allowed Sheshan to have a grandson and heir, circumventing the normal rules of inheritance.
Significance
This passage is included in the genealogies of Chronicles for a few key reasons:
To demonstrate God's sovereignty and ability to work through unconventional means. Even in a society heavily reliant on male lineage, God's plan could be fulfilled through a daughter and a foreign servant.
To show how different people, even foreigners, could be incorporated into the people of Israel. Jarha's inclusion highlights a potential path for non-Israelites to become part of the community.
To provide a complete record of the lineage, even if it deviates from the norm. The inclusion of this unusual case emphasizes the commitment to accuracy in the genealogical records.
In summary, 1 Chronicles 2:34 sets the stage for an important story about how Sheshan overcame the challenge of having no sons to ensure the continuation of his family line through his daughter and his Egyptian servant. It highlights God's ability to work outside of traditional norms and demonstrates the potential for inclusion within the people of Israel.
1 chronicles 2:34 - Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters. Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha.
What does "1 chronicles 2:34" mean?
This verse in 1 Chronicles 2:34 provides context for an unusual situation within a genealogy. Let's break it down:
"Now Sheshan had no sons, but daughters." This establishes that Sheshan, a man in the lineage being traced, had only daughters and no male heirs. This was a significant issue in ancient Israelite society because inheritance and the continuation of the family name were typically passed down through sons.
"Sheshan had a servant, an Egyptian, whose name was Jarha." This introduces Jarha, a servant of Sheshan who was also an Egyptian. This is important because it sets the stage for an unconventional solution to the problem of Sheshan having no male heirs.
What does it MEAN in context?
The following verses reveal the significance of this information:
Sheshan gives his daughter to Jarha in marriage (1 Chronicles 2:35). This was likely done to ensure the continuation of Sheshan's lineage and property.
The marriage between Sheshan's daughter and Jarha results in a son, Attai (1 Chronicles 2:36). This son is considered the grandson and heir of Sheshan, even though he is descended through the female line and through an Egyptian.
Therefore, the verse's meaning is this:
It explains that Sheshan's lack of sons led to a departure from the traditional patrilineal inheritance. To ensure the continuation of his family line, he gave his daughter in marriage to his Egyptian servant, Jarha. This act, though unusual, allowed Sheshan to have a grandson and heir, circumventing the normal rules of inheritance.
Significance
This passage is included in the genealogies of Chronicles for a few key reasons:
To demonstrate God's sovereignty and ability to work through unconventional means. Even in a society heavily reliant on male lineage, God's plan could be fulfilled through a daughter and a foreign servant.
To show how different people, even foreigners, could be incorporated into the people of Israel. Jarha's inclusion highlights a potential path for non-Israelites to become part of the community.
To provide a complete record of the lineage, even if it deviates from the norm. The inclusion of this unusual case emphasizes the commitment to accuracy in the genealogical records.
In summary, 1 Chronicles 2:34 sets the stage for an important story about how Sheshan overcame the challenge of having no sons to ensure the continuation of his family line through his daughter and his Egyptian servant. It highlights God's ability to work outside of traditional norms and demonstrates the potential for inclusion within the people of Israel.